scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Low Reynolds Number Tests of NACA 64-210, NACA 0012, and Wortmann FX67-K170 Airfoils in Rain

R. John Hansman, +1 more
- 01 Aug 1987 - 
- Vol. 24, Iss: 8, pp 559-566
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the aerodynamic performance degradation of the airfoils in heavy rain conditions and to identify the various mechanisms that affect airfoil performance in rain conditions were compared. But the results were limited to the NACA 64-210 and NACA 0012.
Abstract
Wind-tunnel experiments were conducted on Wortmann FX67-K170, NACA 0012, and NACA 64-210 airfoils at a simulated rain rate of 1000 mm/h and Reynolds number of 3.1 X105 to compare the aerodynamic performance degradation of the airfoils in heavy rain conditions and to identify the various mechanisms that affect airfoil performance in rain conditions. Lift and drag were measured in both dry and wet conditions, and a variety of flow-visualiz ation techniques were employed. At low angles of attack, the lift degradation in wet conditions varied significantly between the airfoils. The Wortmann section had the greatest lift degradation (-25%) and the NACA 64-210 airfoil had the least (-5%). At high angles of attack, the NACA 64-210 and NACA 0012 airfoils were observed to have improved aerodynamic performance in rain conditions due to a reduction of boundary-layer separation. Performance degradation in heavy rain for all three airfoils at low angles of attack could be emulated by forced boundary-layer transition near the leading edge. Time-resolved measurements indicate two primary mechanisms are responsible for the observed performance degradation. The initial effect of rain is to cause premature boundary-layer transition at the leading edge. The second effect occurs at time scales consistent with top surface water runback (1-10 s). The runback layer is thought to alter the airfoil geometry effectively, but this effect is most likely exaggerated in these tests due to the small scale. The severity of the performance degradation for the airfoils varied. The relative differences appeared to be related to the susceptibility of each airfoil to premature boundary-layer transition.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Lagrangian-Eulerian scheme for flow around an airfoil in rain

TL;DR: In this article, a Lagrangian particle tracking algorithm for a general body-fitted coordinate system has been developed and linked with a thin layer incompressible Navier-Stokes code.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of rainfall on aircraft aerodynamics

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic and comprehensive overview of the effects of rainfall on aircraft aerodynamic performance is presented, including an introduction of rain-induced aviation accidents, a list of the hazards of rainfall to aircraft, the natural characteristics of rain, the existing rain research techniques, some aerodynamic considerations for rainfall simulation and the current state-of-the-art research achievements in the field of rain aerodynamics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Design and experimental verification of a high efficiency small wind energy portable turbine (SWEPT)

TL;DR: In this article, the theoretical and experimental results on a 40 cm diameter small wind energy portable turbine (SWEPT) with rated wind speed of 4.0 ǫm/s were provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Aerodynamic efficiency of wings in rain

TL;DR: In this article, the degradation of aerodynamic efficiency caused by rain depended on the location of rivulet formation and on the diameter of these rivulets, and they found that the diameter and thickness of the droplets were more important to aerodynamic performance than the locations of the rivules.
Journal ArticleDOI

Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil in heavy rain via a two-way coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach

TL;DR: In this paper, a two-way momentum coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach is developed to study the aerodynamic performance of a NACA 0012 airfoil in heavy rain environment.
References
More filters
Book

Principles of aeroelasticity

TL;DR: In this article, aeroelasticite was used to construct an instationnaire for the structure reference record created on 2005-11-18, modified on 2016-08-08.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Lift Aerodynamics

TL;DR: In this paper, the shape factor of the boundary layer, d*/0 £ = plate length L = lift m = exponent in Cp=x flows, also lift magnification factor (5.1) M = Mach number p = pressure q = dynamic pressure Q = flow rate R = Reynolds number (= u Ox/v in Stratford flows) R6 = Reynolds Number based on momentum thickness uee/v S = Stratford's separation constant (4.10)
Dissertation

Two-dimensional transonic aerodynamic design and analysis using the Euler equations

Mark Drela
TL;DR: Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1986 as discussed by the authors, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Low Reynolds Number Vehicles

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the present status and future possibility of airfoil design and evaluation at subcritical speeds to meet the needs for these applications, including remotely piloted vehicles (RPV's), sailplanes, ultra-light man-carrying/man-powered aircraft, mini-RPVs at low altitudes and wind turbines/propellers.