scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Merely Telling Stories? Narrative and Knowledge in the Human Sciences

Martin Kreiswirth
- 01 Jun 2000 - 
- Vol. 21, Iss: 2, pp 293-318
TLDR
The authors examined how narrative is used within and between different disciplinary formations and found that it is a form of redescription, a mode of knowledge, and how the claims made for it by various disciplines say something about their own operations, limitations and presuppositions.
Abstract
This essay is part of a long-term cross-disciplinary research project, entitled “Narrative between the Disciplines,” which looks at the way narrative is used within and between different disciplinary formations. Its goal is to say something about narrative itself as a form of redescription, a mode of knowledge, and how the claims made for it by the various disciplines say something about their own operations, limitations, and presuppositions. By examining the diverse ways narrative is inflected in different institutional settings, we might also discover something about our concern for narrative now and our notions of disciplinarity and the compartmentalization of knowledge. Elsewhere, I have already sketched out some of the basic questions regarding the recent explosion of interest in narrative and in theorizing about narrative across the disciplines: Why narrative? And why narrative now? Why have we decided to trust the tale? This essay develops some of the questions that my earlier work left open; more specifically, it deals with the inherent “bivalency” of narrative—its dependency on the temporalities both of the telling and of the told—and charts the history of the recent “narrativist turn.” It attempts to present a genealogy of the different ways in which disciplines in the human sciences have formulated and employed narrative and narrative theory, particularly in those fields that make truth claims: history or political science, for example. Why have political scientists now decided to “trust the tale”? Is their sense of narrative the same as say, literary theorists’? And what might these things say about their own discipline and the relations between it and other disciplines in the human sciences?

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Time and Narrative

TL;DR: In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature as discussed by the authors, and this final volume, a comprehensive reexamination and synthesis of the ideas developed in volumes 1 and 2, stands as Ricoeure's most complete and satisfying presentation of his own philosophy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Oneself as Another

Journal ArticleDOI

The content of the Form: narrative discourse and historical representation

TL;DR: Hayden White as mentioned in this paper put together essays on Droysen, Foucault, Jameson and Ricoeur to give an encompassing account of a problematic issue that has been one of the major concerns of historical studies as well as of many other areas of the human sciences: that of the importance of narrative representation in the description or explanation of the "object" of study of human sciences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences

TL;DR: Although storytelling often has negative connotations within science, narrative formats of communication should not be disregarded when communicating science to nonexpert audiences, which offer increased comprehension, interest, and engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect (review)

TL;DR: In this paper, White collects eight interrelated essays primarily concerned with the treatment of history in recent literary critical discourse, focusing on the conventions of historical writing and the ordering of historical consciousness.
References
More filters
Book

The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge

TL;DR: In this article, the status of science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and how the flow of information is controlled in the Western world are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Actual Minds, Possible Worlds.

Book

Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the conflicts of modernity and modernity's relationship with the self in moral space and the providential order of nature, and present a list of the main sources of conflict.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.

Book

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity

TL;DR: Rorty as discussed by the authors argues that it is literature not philosophy that can promote a genuine sense of human solidarity, and argues that a truly liberal culture, acutely aware of its own historical contingency, would fuse the private, individual freedom of the ironic, philosophical perspective with the public project for human solidarity as it is engendered through the insights and sensibilities of great writers.