Since the publication of Teece et al. (1997), the dynamic capabilities framework has attracted a great deal of interest among strategic
management scholars. The framework also offers practical guidelines for practicing managers. The primary reason for the emergence
of the dynamic capabilities framework was the inadequacy of orthodox views (Teece et al., 1997; Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;
Mintzberg et al., 2003, etc.). Teece (2014) draws attention to the entrepreneurial nature of dynamic capabilities, and the role of the
entrepreneurial manager in the framework. Recently, Breznik and Hisrich highlighted the relationship between dynamic capabilities and
innovation capabilities, and Jurksiene and Pundziene (2016) discussed the relationship of dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity. Such
papers embed dynamic capabilities in a multidisciplinary framework. However, after more than two decades and considerable research
on dynamic capabilities, Arend and Bromiley (2009) and Giudici and Reinmoeller (2012) acknowledge that there is still much room for
further operationalisation and empirical validation of key propositions. There is still insufficient evidence and conceptual development of
the links between corporate entrepreneurship, innovation management, and dynamic capabilities.
This special issue of the Baltic Journal of Management brings together scholars from different disciplines and from across the world, all
of whom provide significant conceptual and empirical insights into the operationalization of the dynamic capability concept. Their work
suggests new directions for dynamic capability research.
The issue is composed of five conceptual and empirical research papers that discuss new applications of or offer new perspectives on
dynamic capabilities research. They address: contexts of change management theory, when and how a firm might allocate relevant
resources in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage via quantitative modelling, the ways in which dynamic capabilities are
manifested in the fast-moving fashionwear industry, knowledge networks and clusters, and whether dynamic capabilities can be
developed through the exercise of deliberate learning.
The papers constitute a good balance of theoretical and empirical discourse on the nature, composition, and manifestation of dynamic
capabilities within specific industries and clusters.
"In search for generic sources of capability dynamism: reconceptualising dynamic capabilities from the perspective of
organizational change"
The first paper provides a well-grounded interpretation of the relationship between dynamic capabilities and organisational change,
claiming that "generic" dynamic capabilities depend upon organisational change capabilities. (It is interesting to note that the paper on
the fast-moving fashionwear industry illustrates what domain-specific dynamic capabilities, analysed in the first paper, might look like.)
The paper aims to build a bridge between dynamic capabilities and change management literature through an extensive research
review. The authors note that though the dynamic capabilities concept is very popular and impactful, it is in need of further elaboration.
The paper focuses on the question of "where these [dynamic] capabilities originate and how their dynamism can be sustained in the
long run". The authors offer an original distinction between domain-specific and generic dynamic capabilities and propose an
interpretation of generic dynamic capabilities as "organisation change capabilities". These generic dynamic capabilities as
organisational change capabilities are discussed in the light of organisational change theory. The authors, in a very elegant manner,
differentiate between domain-specific dynamic capabilities and generic dynamic capabilities, presenting a model that describes the
relationships between organisational change capabilities, generic dynamic capabilities, domain-specific capabilities, ordinary
capabilities, and sustainable competitive advantage.
"Achieving a firm’s competitive advantage through dynamic capability"
The second paper of this special aims to provide the reader with a quantitative model that will help managers identify the need for
dynamic capabilities in a rapidly changing environment. The proposed model is based on Barney’s VRIO framework while taking into
account not only internal but external competences. The paper presents three resource allocation strategies: the first is oriented
towards synergy of resources, the second towards acquisition of knowledge and experience (resulting in the uniqueness of deep
knowledge and specific technologies), and the third is a combination of the preceding strategies. The authors hold that the model
enables managers of a firm to identify possible changes in the environment and take appropriate action.
"Dynamic capabilities in fast fashion apparel industry: emergent conceptual framework"
The paper provides a case study of the fashionwear industry based on interviews with industry experts and trade association
executives. The authors aim to show dynamic capabilities at work in this industry. Harnessing the results of interviews, the authors
formulate eight propositions for the development of dynamic capabilities in the fashionwear industry. The paper illustrates the ideas
discussed in the first paper of this issue regarding the domain-specific and generic nature of dynamic capabilities. The authors
conclude that dynamic capabilities are very much industry specific and propose the term "moving capabilities".
"Knowledge network dynamics in clusters: past performance and absorptive capacity"
This is another case study of the Xixona cluster in the Valencian Community in Spain. The paper focuses on absorptive capacity as a
significant element of dynamic capabilities and their impact on the dynamics of knowledge networks. The authors aim to assess the
degree to which absorptive capacity and previous innovative performance contribute to inter-business relationships. The paper
confirms that absorptive capacity and previous innovative performance are predictors of inter-business relationships.
"Developing dynamic capabilities for learning and internationalization: a case study of diversification in an SME"
The goal of the final paper is to assess the development process of dynamic capabilities. The paper is based on qualitative longitudinal
empirical research of an SME that allowed the authors to observe the development of dynamic capabilities throughout a ten year
period. Observation across this time period also allows the authors to assess the context and conditions that facilitate change and trace
the evolution of dynamic capabilities. With the results of the case study, the authors provide valuable insights into the possibilities for
future research into dynamic capabilities. They point in two major directions: to the effect of the behavioural and cognitive
characteristics of decision-makers and individuals on the dynamic capabilities of a firm, and to a more holistic approach to developing a
firm’s capabilities.
Before concluding this editorial, it is important to note that the papers published in this special issue offer insightful answers to the
questions such as: "how do dynamic capabilities contribute to enterprise competitiveness?", "how do enterprises scan their
environment and embrace new knowledge?", "how does opportunity identification and the decision to change take place?", "how do
opportunity exploitation and change management contribute to enterprise performance?", and "how does new knowledge development
contribute to the improved scanning of an enterprise’s environment?". However, the papers also raise some new questions for the
future research of dynamic capabilities: "what is the role of human factors for dynamic capabilities, particularly the cognitive and
emotional involvement of the decision-makers?", "what is the taxonomy of knowledge underlying dynamic capabilities?", and "is it
possible to grasp a holistic picture of the organisational capabilities that lead to sustainable competitive advantage?".