scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Non-acoustical factors in noise management at Heathrow Airport.

Ian H. Flindell, +1 more
- 01 Apr 1999 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 3, pp 27-44
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The background to noise management at Heathrow is described in some detail and a general conclusion that taking non-acoustic factors into account in addition to physical noise levels alone has been of considerable benefit over the years is drawn.
Abstract
Non-acoustic factors in environmental noise can be broadly defined as all those factors other than noise level alone which contribute to noise annoyance and similar effects. Noise levels such as LAeq provide a good indication of the amount of physical noise present, and changes in physical noise level can be expected to correlate with changes in resident's perception, at least to some degree. On the other hand, a flexible approach to noise management based on wide consultation and communication can be extremely important. At Heathrow Airport over the last 20 to 30 years, overall aircraft noise levels have reduced because of the phasing out of the older noisier Chapter 2 aircraft types, but there are also other strategies in place which are clearly regarded as being effective both by airport management and by local community representatives and which are not as easily quantified in terms of noise level alone. This paper describes the background to noise management at Heathrow in some detail and draws a general conclusion that taking non-acoustic factors into account in addition to physical noise levels alone has been of considerable benefit over the years.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Low frequency noise and annoyance.

Leventhall Hg
- 01 Apr 2004 - 
TL;DR: Conventional methods of assessing annoyance, typically based on A-weighted equivalent level, are inadequate for low frequency noise and lead to incorrect decisions by regulatory authorities, but do not deal adequately with fluctuations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Noise within the social context: Annoyance reduction through fair procedures

TL;DR: Fair of the exposure procedure (sound management) can be used as an instrument to reduce noise annoyance and the predicted interaction effect of sound pressure level and procedure on annoyance is shown.
Journal Article

How to forecast community annoyance in planning noisy facilities.

TL;DR: A procedure for estimating future annoyance in changed noise situations is proposed, including the analysis of possible statistical trends of the annoyance reactions over the years - even for steady-state noise loads, and with changing state situations, the effects of the change should be accounted for.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response to a change in transport noise exposure: competing explanations of change effects.

TL;DR: The evidence is of limited and variable quality but, while inadequate to endorse any one explanation, is sufficient to reject some notions and to identify a residual set of plausible explanations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Traffic Noise in Europe: A Comparison of Calculation Methods, Noise Indices and Noise Standards for Road and Railroad Traffic in Europe

TL;DR: In this paper, international data on noise, often produced by using different national calculation methods, was compared and what does it mean for (inter)national noise policy, focusing on international data created by road and railroad traffic.