scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

On the Computational Power of Programs over \(\mathsf {BA}_2\) Monoid

TLDR
Tesson-Therien as discussed by the authors confirmed the PLP conjecture for groups and several subclasses of aperiodic monoids such as the variety DA and the monoids divided by the monoid U.
Abstract
The PLP conjecture for monoids states that for every monoid M, either M is universal (that is, for every language \(L \subseteq \varSigma ^*\) there is a program over M which accepts the language L) or it has the polynomial length property (that is, every program over the monoid M has an equivalent program of length \({\mathsf {poly}}(n)\)). The conjecture has been confirmed (Tesson-Therien (2001)) for the case of groups and several subclasses of aperiodic monoids such as the variety DA and the monoids divided by the monoid U. However, the case of the set of monoids divided by the monoid \(\mathsf {BA}_2\) is still open, which if resolved, confirms the conjecture for all aperiodic monoids.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

The Power of Programs over Monoids in J

TL;DR: In this article, the computational power of programs over monoids in finite aperiodic monoids was investigated, and a fine hierarchy of languages recognized by program over monoid was given, based on the length of programs and some parametrisation of the monoid.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Finite semigroup varieties defined by programs

TL;DR: This work is able to give precise characterizations of these regular languages recognized by polynomial-length programs over finite semigroups belonging to product varieties V ∗ LI, where V is a variety of finite monoids, and LI is the varieties of finite locally trivial semig groups.
Journal Article

The computing power of programs over finite monoids

TL;DR: The formalism of programs over monoids has been studied in this paper for its close connection to parallel complexity classes defined by small-depth boolean circuits, and two basic questions about this model were investigated: When is a monoid rich enough that it can recognize arbitrary languages (provided no restriction on length is imposed)? When is an arbitrary monoid weak enough that all its computations can be realized in polynomial length?
Proceedings ArticleDOI

The Power of Programs over Monoids in DA.

TL;DR: It is proved that the class known as DA satisfies tameness and hence that the regular languages recognized by programs over monoids in DA are precisely those recognizable in the classical sense by morphisms from QDA.
Journal Article

The Computing Power of Programs over Finite Monoids

TL;DR: The formalism of programs over monoids has been studied in this paper for its close connection to parallel complexity classes defined by small-depth boolean circuits, and two basic questions about this model are investigated: When is a monoid rich enough that it can recognize arbitrary languages (provided no restriction on length is imposed)? When is an arbitrary monoid weak enough that all its computations can be realized in polynomial length?
Related Papers (5)