scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings Article

One-Way Bounded-Error Probabilistic Pushdown Automata and Kolmogorov Complexity - (Preliminary Report).

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is proved that a well-known language—the set of palindromes—cannot be recognized by any bounded-error ppda; in other words, this language stays outside of BPCFL.
Abstract
One-way probabilistic pushdown automata (or ppda’s) are a simple model of randomized computation with last-in first-out memory device known as stacks and, when error probabilities are bounded away from 1 / 2, ppda’s can characterize a family of bounded-error probabilistic context-free languages (BPCFL). We resolve a fundamental question raised by Hromkovic and Schnitger [Inf. Comput. 208 (2010) 982–995] concerning the limitation of the language recognition power of bounded-error ppda’s. More specifically, we prove that a well-known language—the set of palindromes—cannot be recognized by any bounded-error ppda; in other words, this language stays outside of BPCFL. Furthermore, we show that, with bounded-error probability, no ppda can determine whether the center bit of input string is 1 (one). For those impossibility results, we utilize a complexity measure of algorithmic information known as Kolmogorov complexity. In our proofs, we first transform ppda’s into an ideal shape and then lead to a key lemma by employing a Kolmogorov complexity argument.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Behavioral Strengths and Weaknesses of Various Models of Limited Automata

TL;DR: This work examines the behaviors of various models of k-limited automata, which naturally extend Hibbard’s scan limited automata and discusses fundamental properties of those machine models and obtains inclusions and separations among language families induced by these machine models.
Posted Content

The No Endmarker Theorem for One-Way Probabilistic Pushdown Automata.

TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that the endmarkers are removable without changing the acceptance criteria of each input instance, which is a general model of one-way probabilistic pushdown automata.

Limited automata and context-free languages.

TL;DR: In this article, the equivalence between 2-limited automata and pushdown automata is investigated, comparing the relative sizes of their descriptions, and it is shown that the class of languages accepted by deterministic 1-tape Turing machines coincides with the classes of deterministic context-free languages.
Posted Content

Behavioral Strengths and Weaknesses of Various Models of Limited Automata

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the behaviors of various models of $k$-limited automata, which naturally extend Hibbard's [Inf. Control, vol. 11, pp. 196--238, 1967] scan limited automata.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Book Review: An introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications Second Edition, 1997 by Ming Li and Paul Vitanyi (Springer (Graduate Text Series))

William Gasarch
- 01 Sep 1997 - 
TL;DR: The complexity of a string is defined as the shortest description of x, and a formal definition is given that is equivalent to the one in the book.
Posted Content

Swapping Lemmas for Regular and Context-Free Languages

TL;DR: This work develops its substitution, called a swapping lemma for regular languages, to demonstrate the non-regularity of a target language with advice, and presents a similar form of swappingLemma, which serves as a technical tool to show that certain languages are not context-free with advice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Properties of Probabilistic Pushdown Automata

TL;DR: The difference between classes of languages such as P and PSPACE, NL and SAC^1, PL and Diff_< is characterized as the difference between the number of stack symbols; that is, whether the stack alphabet contains one versus two distinct symbols.
Journal ArticleDOI

Immunity and pseudorandomness of context-free languages

TL;DR: The computational complexity of context-free languages is discussed, concentrating on two well-known structural properties?immunity and pseudorandomness, and it is shown that CFL contains REG/n-pseudorandom languages.
Related Papers (5)