scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient Outcomes Following Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Free Gingival Graft Procedures

Jeffrey R. Wessel, +1 more
- 01 Mar 2008 - 
- Vol. 79, Iss: 3, pp 425-430
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Compared patient-based outcomes for CTGs and FGGs: proportion of subjects reporting pain in the palate at 3 days was significantly greater for FGG (P <0.05) and there were no significant intergroup differences at 3 weeks.
Abstract
Background: Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTGs) and free gingival grafts (FGGs) are common periodontal procedures with similar indications; however, they may differ regarding patient outcomes. Reports on postoperative periodontal patient outcomes are limited. The aim of this observational trial was to compare patient-based outcomes for CTGs and FGGs.Methods: Patients who received CTG or FGG completed postoperative questionnaires at 3 days and 3 weeks to assess pain, number of analgesic pills taken, and number of days pills were taken. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS).Results: Twenty-three subjects (12 CTGs and 11 FGGs) completed the study. Differences between CTG and FGG groups in VAS pain scores at 3 days did not reach statistical significance. The proportion of subjects reporting pain in the palate at 3 days was significantly greater for FGG (P <0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences at 3 weeks. For the FGG group, 3-week VAS pain scores were le...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

TL;DR: All RC procedures can provide significant reduction in recession depth and CAL gain for Miller Class I and II recession-type defects and subepithelial CT graft-based procedures provided the best outcomes for clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial.

TL;DR: No differences were demonstrated in the post-operative pain and root coverage outcome in patients subjected to CAF with connective tissue (CTG) or de-epithelialized gingival (DGG) grafts.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques

TL;DR: APF/V is a successful treatment concept to increase the width of keratinized tissue or attached gingiva around teeth and only limited data are available favoring SCTGs over FGGs for soft tissue volume augmentation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Periodontal plastic surgery

TL;DR: Current knowledge in terms of the etiology, diagnosis, prognosis and surgical treatment of gingival recession is summarized to limit patient morbidity and improve the esthetic outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review

TL;DR: SCTGs were the best-documented method for gain of soft tissue volume at implant sites and partially edentulous sites and aesthetically at immediate implant sites, better papilla fill and higher marginal mucosal levels were obtained using SCTGs compared to non-grafted sites.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage

TL;DR: The use of the subepithelial connective tissue graft as a donor source for root coverage is described and an increase of 2 to 6 mm of root coverage has been achieved in 56 cases over 4 years with minimal sulcus depth and no recurrence of recession.
Journal ArticleDOI

Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Overall, PPS was effective in reducing gingival recessions with a concomitant improvement in attachment levels and CTG was statistically significantly more effective than GTR in recession reduction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the "envelope" technique.

TL;DR: A new method for covering localized areas of root exposure with free connective tissue grafts uses connectives obtained from the depth of the hard palate, leaving only a narrow surface defect at the donor site.
Journal ArticleDOI

Postoperative Complications Following Gingival Augmentation Procedures

TL;DR: FSTG procedures incur a higher likelihood for postoperative pain or bleeding than SCTG procedures, whereas the application of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) may significantly reduce the probability of swelling and bleeding.
Related Papers (5)