scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
There is strong evidence that poor oral hygiene, a history of periodontitis and cigarette smoking, are risk indicators for peri-implant disease.
Abstract
Background: Peri-implant diseases include peri-implant mucositis, describing an inflammatory lesion of the peri-implant mucosa, and peri-implantitis, which also includes loss of supporting bone. Methods: A literature search of the Medline database (Ovid), up to 21 January 2008 was carried out using a systematic approach, in order to review the evidence for diagnosis and the risk indicators for peri-implant diseases. Results: Experimental and clinical studies have identified various diagnostic criteria including probing parameters, radiographic assessment and peri-implant crevicular fluid and saliva analyses. Cross-sectional analyses have investigated potential risk indicators for peri-implant disease including poor oral hygiene, smoking, history of periodontitis, diabetes, genetic traits, alcohol consumption and implant surface. There is evidence that probing using a light force (0.25 N) does not damage the peri-implant tissues and that bleeding on probing (BOP) indicates presence of inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa. The probing depth, the presence of BOP, and suppuration should be assessed regularly for the diagnosis of peri-implant diseases. Radiographs are required to evaluate supporting bone levels around implants. The review identified strong evidence that poor oral hygiene, a history of periodontitis and cigarette smoking, are risk indicators for peri-implant disease. Future prospective studies are required to confirm these factors as true risk factors.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discussed the most common peri-implant lesions caused by bacteria and concluded that the treatment of periimplant disease must include anti-infective measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases.

TL;DR: It is revealed that only a few studies provided data on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases, and cross-sectional studies on implant-treated subjects are rare and data from only two study samples were available.

Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology

TL;DR: It was concluded that the treatment of peri-implant disease must include anti-infective measures and it appeared that non-surgical mechanical therapy caused the reduction in inflammation but also that the adjunctive use of antimicrobial mouthrinses had a positive effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

Periimplant diseases: where are we now? – Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology

TL;DR: Clinical and radiographic data should routinely be obtained after prosthesis installation on implants in order to establish a baseline for the diagnosis of peri-implantitis during maintenance of implant patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis

TL;DR: It is evident that periodontitis and peri-implantitis are not fundamentally different from the perspectives of etiology, pathogenesis, risk assessment, diagnosis and therapy, Nevertheless, some difference in the host response to these two infections may explain the occasional rapid progression of pero-IMplantitis lesions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases.

TL;DR: It is revealed that only a few studies provided data on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases, and cross-sectional studies on implant-treated subjects are rare and data from only two study samples were available.
Journal Article

Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them.

TL;DR: Modately roughened surfaces seem to have some clinical advantages over smoother or rougher surfaces, but the differences are small and often not statistically significant.
Journal ArticleDOI

A prospective 15‐year follow‐up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss.

TL;DR: It is concluded that the long-term results of the mandibular implant treatment were extremely successful, regarding both the fixed prostheses and implant stability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long‐term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10‐year prospective cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System

TL;DR: Patients with implants replacing teeth lost due to chronic periodontitis demonstrated lower survival rates and more biological complications than patients with implantsReplacing teeth lostDue to reasons other thanperiodontitis during a 10-year maintenance period.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nine‐ to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri‐implant lesions

TL;DR: After 10 years in use without systematic supportive treatment, peri-implant lesions is a common clinical entity adjacent to titanium implants after 9-14 years of function.
Related Papers (5)