Journal ArticleDOI
Politics and Islam in modern Turkey
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In the Turkish Republic of 1923, the principal component in the ideology of the former Ottoman regime was Islam under the Sultan-Caliph, who was both the temporal and the spiritual ruler as discussed by the authors.Abstract:
Until the founding of the Turkish Republic in October 1923, the principal component in the ideology of the former Ottoman regime was Islam under the Sultan-Caliph, who was both the temporal and the spiritual ruler. Mustafa Kemal Pasha, later Atatiirk, and his supporters decided to adopt secular nationalism as the ideology of the new state, hoping in time to relegate Islam to the sidelines. The aim in adopting secularism was to create a modern, rational state with institutions and laws which would facilitate the development of capitalism in Turkey. The Kemalists did not want any opponents to their grand design to use religion as barrier to the changes they envisaged. Thus, having learned the lesson of the second constitutional period (1908-18) they tried to remove Islam from political discourse, though not always successfully. Turkish society as yet undifferentiated in terms of classes and deprived of other means of expressing disaffection by the single-party regime, tended to use Islamic discourse to challenge the legitimacy of the state. The state responded by limiting the space in which this discourse took place by extending secular laws and becoming more and more militant against Islam. This was, in fact, the continuation of the contest for the state which began soon after Sultan Abdulhamid II (1876-1909) was forced to restore constitutional government in July 1908. The state retained its Islamic character, with Islam specified as its official faith and the Sultan-Caliph as its head. Nevertheless, after the election of the Chamber of Deputies in December 1908 and with the secret Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) exerting influence from behind the scene, the power of the sultan was no longer as absolute as it had been. Needless to say, Abdulhamid was not happy with his new role and would have liked to restore the status quo ante as he had done once before in 1878.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Political Islam and the welfare (Refah) party in Turkey
Abstract: The municipal elections of March 27, 1994, the national elections of December 24, 1995, and the local elections of June 2, 1996, in which the Welfare Party (WP) took 33.5 percent of the votes in forty-one districts, have constituted a series of seismic events in the Turkish political landscape. Despite the opposition of the secularist Turkish armed forces and big business, the WP won 21.1 percent of the vote and 158 seats in the 550 seat Turkish parliament and after great maneuvering formed a coalition government with Tansu Ciller of the True Path Party (TPP). This coalition government between the pro-Islamic Necmettin Erbakan and the Europhile Tansu Ciller indicates the duality of Turkish identity and marks a turning point in the history of the Turkish Republic. On June 28, 1996, for the first time, the Turkish republic had a prime minister whose political philosophy was based on Islam. This event marked a psychological break in Turkish history that was the outcome of a search for new relations between state and society. The results of the elections and the negotiation to form a coalition government revealed a society sharply divided along secular versus Islamist sociocultural lines. The WP is one of the main avenues for political Islam to articulate its demands within the public space. It represents a platform for those who seek a change of the secular system as well as for those who demand reforms in the system, within the bureaucratic state structure. This competing, even conflicting, campaign to reorganize the political center and transform the bureaucratic system has mobilized large segments of the population, from Kurdish groups to the newly emerging Anatolian bourgeoisie, in the name of identity and justice. Turkey sets an example of what is possible in integrating Islamic movements into its relatively democratic political system. By accommodating Islamic voices and expanding the boundaries of participation, Turkey has preserved and consolidated its democracy and civil society. Moreover, this accommodation has created the possibility of reimagining Islamic tradition and has thus created a new synthesis. It advances the debate on the relationship between democracy and Islam, on the one hand, and modernity and tradition, on the other. The study of the Islamization of society and politics presupposes a dialectical approach, that is, a "top down" process through the exercise of state power and a "bottom up" influence through social associations.' This essay will examine the externalization of Islamic political identity in the general context of state-society relations, the way in which the 1980 military
Journal ArticleDOI
Parameters and Strategies of Islam–State Interaction in Republican Turkey
TL;DR: The Turkish version of radical Islam, like that elsewhere in the Middle East, has asserted itself effectively in all aspects and at all levels of society, making a stark contrast between the sixty years of the republic and the period since 1980.
Book ChapterDOI
Economic change in twentieth-century Turkey: is the glass more than half full?
TL;DR: One metaphor for assessing Turkey's economic performance in the early twenty-first century may be to ask whether the glass is half full or half empty as discussed by the authors, which is a metaphor that can be used to assess whether the country is half-full or half-empty.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party's Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the populist strategy of the Turkish Justice and Development Party between the 2007 presidential election, when Turkish politics experienced an impasse, and the 2010 referendum over the constitutional amendments, and conclude that the discourse articulated by Prime Minister Erdogan leads to the conclusion that he has continually appealed to the masses with an anti-institutional rhetoric that divides society into "the people" and "the elite".
Book
Popular Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East
TL;DR: Chalcraft's ground-breaking account of popular protest emphasizes the revolutionary modern history of the entire region as mentioned in this paper, focusing on how commoners, subjects and citizens have long mobilised in defiance of authorities.