scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevención y reacción frente a restricciones públicas injustificadas de la competencia por las autoridades antitrust españolas (Prevention and Reaction Against Unjustified Restraints to Competition by Spanish Antitrust Authorities)

TLDR
In this paper, the authors examine the activities of promotion and advocacy of the Spanish competition authorities in the face of unjustified public barriers and restrains to competition, distinguishing between preventive and reactive tools, arguing that preventive measures are articulated through reports that seek to inspire regulation and administrative action, persuading the public authorities to adopt those solutions that are more respectful of free competition in the markets.
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: Este articulo examina las actividades de promocion de la competencia de las autoridades de competencia espanolas frente a las barreras y restricciones publicas injustificadas a la libre competencia, distinguiendo entre actuaciones preventivas y reactivas. La actuacion preventiva se articula a traves de informes que buscan inspirar la regulacion y actuacion administrativa, persuadiendo a los poderes publicos para la adopcion de aquellas soluciones mas respetuosas con la libre competencia en los mercados. La actuacion reactiva se verifica una vez la regulacion o actuacion administrativa se ha materializado y es de caracter impugnatorio. Este mecanismo de intervencion ex post se ha visto reforzado en diciembre de 2013 con el reconocimiento a la Comision Nacional de los Mercados y de la Competencia de potestades adicionales de impugnacion de actuaciones y normas en la Ley de Garantia de la Unidad de Mercado. English Abstract: This article examines the activities of promotion and advocacy of the Spanish competition authorities in the face of unjustified public barriers and restrains to competition, distinguishing between preventive and reactive tools. The preventive measures are articulated through reports that seek to inspire regulation and administrative action, persuading the public authorities to adopt those solutions that are more respectful of free competition in the markets. The reactive action is verified once the regulation or administrative action has occurred through their challenge in court. This mechanism of intervention ex post has been reinforced in December 2013 with the recognition to the National Markets and Competition Commission of additional powers to challenge restrictive public measures in accordance to the Market Unit Guarantee Law (MUGL).

read more

Citations
More filters

Puede sancionarse a las Administraciones Públicas cuando no actúan como operador económico si restringen la competencia o promueven conductas anticompetitivas

TL;DR: In ocasiones las conductas anticompetitivas de los operadores en el mercado vienen precedidas o¯¯¯¯¯¯acompanadas de intervenciones de los poderes publicos that las incitan, promueven o patrocinan as mentioned in this paper.
Posted Content

Six Principles for Limiting Government-Facilitated Restraints on Competition

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose six general principles that are aimed at creating a system of "checks and balances" which maintains adequate safeguards to ensure that competition will be limited only where socially warranted.

Una regulación económica más eficiente en el mundo digital. Las autoridades independientes del productividad

TL;DR: Aguilar et al. as mentioned in this paper propone una prediccion informada de los oportunidades que implica la disrupcion de this cuarto sector, el digital, for el funcionamiento interno del sector publico and la intervencion publica en los mercados, en======¯¯¯¯ particular, para la regulacion.
Posted Content

Identifying, Challenging, and Assigning Political Responsibility for State Regulation Restricting Competition

Maureen Ohlhausen
- 01 Jan 2006 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of competition advocacy in combating anticompetitive state regulation is examined, and the analysis suggests potential avenues for surmounting these constraints, such as the state action doctrine.
References
More filters

Competition advocacy : time for a rethink?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the conventional wisdom concerning competition advocacy, paying particular attention to the applicability of such wisdom to developing countries, and conclude with a call for considerably more thought about what, hitherto, has been one of the relatively uncontroversial aspects of many competition authorities' activities.

Puede sancionarse a las Administraciones Públicas cuando no actúan como operador económico si restringen la competencia o promueven conductas anticompetitivas

TL;DR: In ocasiones las conductas anticompetitivas de los operadores en el mercado vienen precedidas o¯¯¯¯¯¯acompanadas de intervenciones de los poderes publicos that las incitan, promueven o patrocinan as mentioned in this paper.
Journal Article

Competition Policy in Transition Economies: The Role of Competition Advocacy

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a model that examines the determinants of rent-seeking behavior in sufficient detail to enable the competition agencies to develop a coherent and focused response to interest group challenges to the sustainability of pro-market reforms.
Book

The limits of competition policy : the shortcomings of antitrust in developing and reforming economies

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that, whatever economic path developing countries pursue, imposing Western-style antitrust regimes will engender uncertainty, chill economic behaviour, and foster an unhealthy climate for business, and that soliciting preferential treatment from the state, which leads to state-sponsored non-tariff barriers, is more attractive than private cartelization.