scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference

TLDR
In this article, the idea of provincializing Europe and the Narration of Modernity is discussed, with a focus on postcoloniality and the artifice of history, and the two histories of capital and domestic cruelty.
Abstract
Acknowlegments ix Introduction: The Idea of Provincializing Europe 3 Part One: Historicism and the Narration of Modernity Chapter 1. Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History 27 Chapter 2. The Two Histories of Capital 47 Chapter 3. Translating Life-Worlds into Labor and History 72 Chapter 4. Minority Histories, Subaltern Pasts 97 Part Two: Histories of Belonging Chapter 5. Domestic Cruelty and the Birth of the Subject 117 Chapter 6. Nation and Imagination 149 Chapter 7. Adda: A History of Sociality 180 Chapter 8. Family, Fraternity, and Salaried labor 214 Epilogue. Reason and the Critique of Historicism 237 Notes 257 Index 299

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Political Islam and Foreign Policy in Europe and the United States

TL;DR: The epistemological underpinnings of European and American foreign policy toward political Islam are discussed in this article, where the authors argue that the appearance of Islam in politics is equated with fundamentalism and intolerance, and that the forms and degrees of separation between Islam and politics that do exist in contemporary Muslim-majority societies either do not appear at all or appear as illfitting imitations of a Western secular ideal.
Dissertation

Curriculum as destiny: forging national identity in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh

Y. C. Rosser
TL;DR: The authors investigates the political, social, and religious influences on curriculum policy and social studies textbooks in three nations of the Indian Subcontinent, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, which share thousands of years of history, but who after 1947 have entertained distinct, often opposing visions of the past.
Journal ArticleDOI

The nation in heterogeneous time

TL;DR: Benedict Anderson, in his now classic Imagined Communities (1983), has made famous the argument that the nation lives in homogeneous empty time as discussed by the authors, which was, in fact, following a dominant strand in modern historical thinking that imagines the social space of modernity as distributed in homogenous empty time.