scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this study of CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, chest compressions were not delivered half of the time, and most compressions was too shallow.
Abstract
ContextCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend target values for compressions, ventilations, and CPR-free intervals allowed for rhythm analysis and defibrillation. There is little information on adherence to these guidelines during advanced cardiac life support in the field.ObjectiveTo measure the quality of out-of-hospital CPR performed by ambulance personnel, as measured by adherence to CPR guidelines.Design and SettingCase series of 176 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by paramedics and nurse anesthetists in Stockholm, Sweden, London, England, and Akershus, Norway, between March 2002 and October 2003. The defibrillators recorded chest compressions via a sternal pad fitted with an accelerometer and ventilations by changes in thoracic impedance between the defibrillator pads, in addition to standard event and electrocardiographic recordings.Main Outcome MeasureAdherence to international guidelines for CPR.ResultsChest compressions were not given 48% (95% CI, 45%-51%) of the time without spontaneous circulation; this percentage was 38% (95% CI, 36%-41%) when subtracting the time necessary for electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation. Combining these data with a mean compression rate of 121/min (95% CI, 118-124/min) when compressions were given resulted in a mean compression rate of 64/min (95% CI, 61-67/min). Mean compression depth was 34 mm (95% CI, 33-35 mm), 28% (95% CI, 24%-32%) of the compressions had a depth of 38 mm to 51 mm (guidelines recommendation), and the compression part of the duty cycle was 42% (95% CI, 41%-42%). A mean of 11 (95% CI, 11-12) ventilations were given per minute. Sixty-one patients (35%) had return of spontaneous circulation, and 5 of 6 patients discharged alive from the hospital had normal neurological outcomes.ConclusionsIn this study of CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, chest compressions were not delivered half of the time, and most compressions were too shallow. Electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation accounted for only small parts of intervals without chest compressions.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4 Adult advanced life support

TL;DR: Cardiothoracic anesthetic, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK Anaesthesia and intensive care medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK Surgical ICU, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Critical Care and Resuscitation, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Warwick, UK
Journal ArticleDOI

Post–Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

TL;DR: This scientific statement outlines current understanding and identifies knowledge gaps in the pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis of patients who regain spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest to provide a resource for optimization of post–cardiac arrest care.
References
More filters
Journal Article

Declaration of helsinki.

Journal ArticleDOI

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: A report of 14 720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

TL;DR: The NRCPR is described as the first comprehensive, Utstein-based, standardized characterization of in-hospital resuscitation in the United States, with results that suggest that discharged survivors were generally good and neurological outcome in discharged survivors was generally good.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model.

TL;DR: A graphic model that describes survival from sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as a function of time intervals to critical prehospital interventions is developed and is useful in planning community EMS programs, comparing EMS systems, and showing how different arrival times within a system affect survival rate.
Related Papers (5)