scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise (SPIN)

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
All 10 forms of the test of Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) were presented to 128 listeners who had some degree of sensorineural hearing loss, and there are large differences in mean performance on the low-context portions.
Abstract
All ten forms of the SPIN test [D. N. Kalikow, K. N. Stevens, and L. L. Elliott, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1337–1351 (1977)] were presented to 128 listeners who had some sensorineural hearing loss. Speech materials were presented at a level calculated to correspond, approximately, to the loudness equivalent to 60 dB SPL for a normal‐hearing listener, and the babble noise was set 8 dB lower (S/B = +8 dB). Half of the subjects heard the test through earphones and half via loudspeaker; half were tested in a single session and half in two sessions. Statistical analysis of these results indicated that (a) transducer, (b) visits, and (c) order of testing had no influence on test scores. The average reliability coefficient was 0.906 for the high‐probability items in a form and 0.848 for the low‐probability items. The ten forms tested, however, do not constitute a set of equivalent forms; and it is difficult to identify a subset of equivalent forms, because of the large differences in difficulty among forms with re...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of text‐to‐speech conversion for English

TL;DR: This review traces the early work on the development of speech synthesizers, discovery of minimal acoustic cues for phonetic contrasts, evolution of phonemic rule programs, incorporation of prosodic rules, and formulation of techniques for text analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults

TL;DR: Mixed results were found, and in some circumstances cognition was a useful predictor of hearing-aid benefit, and no one cognitive test always gave a significant result, but measures of working memory and reading span were mostly effective, whereas measures of general ability were mostly ineffective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction

TL;DR: Results from both dual tasks support the hypothesis that NR reduces listening effort and frees up cognitive resources for other tasks, and future hearing aid research should incorporate objective measurements of cognitive benefits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation

TL;DR: It is argued that a synthesis of new knowledge concerning the functional neuroscience of auditory cognition is necessary to inform the design and fitting of digital signal processing in “intelligent” hearing devices, as well as to inform best practices for resituating hearing aid fitting in a broader context of audiologic rehabilitation.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers

TL;DR: It is shown that ESTOI can be interpreted in terms of an orthogonal decomposition of short-time spectrograms into intelligibility subspaces, i.e., a ranking of spectrogram features according to their importance to intelligibility.
Related Papers (5)