scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The Law of Affirmative Action: Twenty Five Years of Supreme Court Decisions on Race and Remedies

TLDR
The Law of Affirmative Action as discussed by the authors provides a comprehensive chronicle of the evolution of the Supreme Court's involvement with the racial affirmative action issue over the last quarter century, starting with the 1974 DeFunis v. Odegaard decision and the 1978 Bakke decision, which marked the beginnings of the Court's entanglement with affirmative action.
Abstract
The debate over race in this country has of late converged on the contentious issue of affirmative action. Although the Supreme Court once supported the concept of racial affirmative action, in recent years a majority of the Court has consistently opposed various affirmative action programs. The Law of Affirmative Action provides a comprehensive chronicle of the evolution of the Supreme Court's involvement with the racial affirmative action issue over the last quarter century. Starting with the 1974 DeFunis v. Odegaard decision and the 1978 Bakke decision, which marked the beginnings of the Court's entanglement with affirmative action, Girardeau Spann examines every major Supreme Court affirmative action decision, showing how the controversy the Court initially left unresolved in DeFunis has persisted through the Court's 1998-99 term. Including nearly thirty principal cases, covering equal protection, voting rights, Title VII, and education, The Law of Affirmative Action is the only work to treat the Court decisions on racial affirmative action so closely, tracing the votes of each justice who has participated in the decisions. Indispensable for students and scholars, this timely volume elucidates reasons for the 180 degree turn in opinion on an issue so central to the debate on race in America today.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research.

TL;DR: The authors summarize and meta-analytically estimate relationships of AAP attitudes with structural features of such programs, perceiver demographic and psychological characteristics, and interactions of structural features with perceiver characteristics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates.

TL;DR: The merit-based argument, grounded in empirical studies, concludes that the policy of affirmative action conforms to the American ideal of fairness and is a necessary policy.
Dissertation

Reparations and State Accountability

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors put forward a theory of reparations in the domestic liberal democratic context, grounded in a variety of real world cases, that suggests that governments owe reparations to African Americans in a much wider range of situations than is usually recognized.
Journal ArticleDOI

How believing in affirmative action quotas affects White women’s self-image

TL;DR: This article found that white women who do not think of themselves as beneficiaries of affirmative action may report a more positive self-image as a function of quota beliefs, consistent with research suggesting that non-beneficiaries can derive selfimage benefits from maintaining the belief that affirmative action entails quotas, but no support for the stigma of incompetence perspective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Overcoming negative reactions of nonbeneficiaries to employment equity: the effect of participation in policy formulation.

TL;DR: It is proposed that nonbeneficiaries would be more likely to support an EE policy when allowed instrumental participation in the policy's development when allowed psychological ownership as the mediating mechanism underlying the effects of instrumental participation.