scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life as mentioned in this paper explores the intelligentsia's love affair with social perfection and reveals how that idealistic dream is destroying exactly what has made the inventive Western world irresistible to the peoples of foreign lands.
Abstract
One of the grim comedies of the twentieth century was the fate of miserable victims of communist regimes who climbed walls, swam rivers, dodged bullets, and found other desperate ways to achieve liberty in the West at the same time as intellectuals in the West sentimentally proclaimed that these very regimes were the wave of the future. A similar tragicomedy is being played out in our century: as the victims of despotism and backwardness from third world nations pour into Western states, the same ivory tower intellectuals assert that Western life is a nightmare of inequality and oppression. In The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life, Kenneth Minogue explores the intelligentsia's love affair with social perfection and reveals how that idealistic dream is destroying exactly what has made the inventive Western world irresistible to the peoples of foreign lands. The Servile Mind looks at how Western morality has evolved into mere "politico-moral" posturing about admired ethical causes--from solving world poverty and creating peace to curing climate change. Today, merely making the correct noises and parading one's essential decency by having the correct opinions has became a substitute for individual moral actions. Instead, Minogue posits, we ask that our government carry the burden of solving our social--and especially moral--problems for us. The sad and frightening irony is that as we allow the state to determine our moral order and inner convictions, the more we need to be told how to behave and what to think.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics

TL;DR: In this paper, Markova presents an ethics of dialogicality as an alternative to the narrow perspective of individualism and cognitivism that has traditionally dominated the field of social psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intelligence and the management of national security: the post 9/11 evolution of an Australian National Security Community

TL;DR: The authors examines the Western managerial approach to security using Australia as a case study and argues that the growth of Australian security agencies since 2001 and their evolution into a National Security Community after 2008 has neglected basic maxims of political and constitutional prudence and eschews the modern state's own contractual self-understanding of sovereignty and political obligation.
Dissertation

An examination of theological and ethical-issues relating to 'sacred curses' with reference to church discipline and social challenges

TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of the Reformation and the Enlightenment on the idea of individual autonomy in the post-modern Church has been discussed, and the relationship between authority and individual autonomy has been examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Learning How Not to Be Good: A Plebeian Perspective

TL;DR: The major political reforms proposed in John McCormick,s Machiavellian Democracy comprise what might be termed a "plebeian" model of democracy as mentioned in this paper, one inspired by the plebeian democracy of late republican Rome, which at once formally differentiated first-class citizens (Senators and Equestrians) from second-class voters (plebeians), but, unlike other polities with hierarchical social structures based on differentiated socioeconomic classes, relied on such differentiation to combat, and not just cement, elite power.
Book ChapterDOI

Gustav Ichheiser on Rationality and Irrationality

TL;DR: Ichheiser as mentioned in this paper argued that rationality and irrationality were social and relational concepts and argued that although it is meaningful to make a distinction between these two concepts, it is wrong to treat them as separate from one another; even more, he questioned whether the cold rationality is "superior" to "irrational" impulses.