scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle

Gabriel Uzquiano
- 01 Mar 2004 - 
- Vol. 38, Iss: 1, pp 135-153
Reads0
Chats0
About
This article is published in Noûs.The article was published on 2004-03-01. It has received 56 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Supreme court & Concurring opinion.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What are groups

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue for a view of groups, things like teams, committees, clubs and courts, which they call concreta groups, that is, groups exist only when a group structure is realized.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ontological individualism reconsidered

TL;DR: It is argued that ontological individualism is false, and even when individualistic facts are expanded to include people’s local environments and practices, those still underdetermine the social facts that obtain, which has implications for explanation as well as ontology.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Metaphysics of Social Groups

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine answers to the question "Do groups exist?" and argue that worries about puzzles of composition, motivations to accept methodological individualism, and a rejection of Racialism support a negative answer.
Journal ArticleDOI

The metaphysics of groups

TL;DR: The third option is to identify groups with sets, which meets all of the desiderata if only we take care over which sets they are identified with as mentioned in this paper, which is the only one we consider in this paper.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Statue and the Clay

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyse the nature of the relation tripartite x constitue y a l'instant t d'un point de vue de la logique modale, de la recherche scientifique sur la fusion des atomes, de l'ontologie and de la metaphysique des parties du temps.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Non‐Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter

Kit Fine
- 01 Mar 2003 - 
TL;DR: The authors argue that this apparent difference in properties is the product of a linguistic illusion; there is just one thing out there, but different sorts or guises under which it may be described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why a Class can't Change its Members

Richard Sharvy
- 01 Nov 1968 - 
TL;DR: The U.S. Supreme Court is not identical to any class as mentioned in this paper, and therefore it cannot be identified with any class. But the Supreme Court does not change in membership.