scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Working-Class Vote in Chile: Christian Democracy versus Marxism

Maurice Zeitlin, +1 more
- 01 Mar 1970 - 
- Vol. 21, Iss: 1, pp 16
TLDR
In Chile, a broad electoral bloc emerged uniting the major parties of the left, the socialists and communists, and several splinter parties, in a coalition called the Popular Action Front (Frente de Accion Popular-F.R.A.P.).
Abstract
There is abundant comparative evidence that political parties differ substantially in the support they receive from different social classes, whether or not their appeals manifestly have class content. In particular, Socialist and Communist parties, for reasons inherent in their theoretical position and political programmes, have focused their organizational efforts and agitational appeals on urban industrial workers. And, wherever such parties have gained mass followings, their predominant core resides in the working classes. 'No other party,' as Seymour Martin Lipset puts it, 'has been as thoroughly and completely the party of the working class' as the Communist Party.' Chile is the only country in Latin America (Cuba excepted) in which the organized working class in politically and socially significant and is led by Marxian socialists and communists. The socialist movement has had a political base in the working class for many decades, especially among miners, and in the 'fifties, based on growing working class support, it began to become a serious contender for political power. Between 1952 and 1956, the working-class movement became increasingly unified; on the trade union level, a central labour organization, Central Unica de Trabajadores (C.U.T.) was formed; and in the political arena a broad electoral bloc emerged uniting the major parties of the left, the socialists and communists, and several splinter parties, in a coalition called the Popular Action Front (Frente de Accion Popular-F.R.A.P.). While the organized strength of the labour movement declined under the quasi-caudillo Ibafiez regime, 1952-8, working-class militancy and combativeness rose. The number of strikes, the number of workers affected and of man-days lost were all far higher during this period than the preceding post-war years.2 From F.R.A.P.'s formation in 1956 to the present, its electoral strength has risen rapidly. In the presidential elections

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973-95

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine social cleavages and the impact of political legacies on Chile's post-authoritarian party system and argue that cleavage appearance in a party system depends on political agency, which can even create social identities and social conflicts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mining: anthropological perspectives

TL;DR: A review of the anthropological literature on mining, drawing attention to the contributions of neighboring disciplines, and identifying promising avenues for future research can be found in this article, with emphasis on the extractive and not on the processing or marketing stages.
Book

The Church and Politics in Chile: Challenges to Modern Catholicism

TL;DR: The Princeton Legacy Library as mentioned in this paper uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press.
Journal Article

Conducta electoral y estratos económicos: el voto de los sectores populares en Chile

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the vote of the popular sectors in the main elections of the Chilean recovered democracy, from a comparative perspective, using ecological inference methods and showed that the voting profiles of both kinds of workers differ on time.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Socio-Economic Variables and Voting for the Radical Left: Chile, 1952

TL;DR: The study of political behavior is relatively a late undertaking of the human sciences as discussed by the authors, partly because of the notion that political behavior has a specificity of its own, that it has an etiology different from that of other forms of social and psychological behavior.