scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Tolerance intervals in mixed models and confidence intervals for lognormal models

TLDR
In this article, the generalized confidence interval idea is used in the derivation of tolerance limits for the one-way random model, and confidence intervals for the mean of a lognormal model, using also an adaptation of the concept of generalized confidence intervals.
Abstract
The generalized confidence interval idea is used in the derivation of tolerance limits for the one-way random model. We also present confidence intervals for the mean of a lognormal model, using also an adaptation of the concept of generalized confidence interval. Simulation studies an real data examples are provided to illustrate the performance of both methods.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Generalized Confidence Intervals

TL;DR: In this paper, a generalized version of the confidence interval is defined, and the generalized confidence interval can be applied to the problem of constructing confidence intervals for the difference in two exponential means and for variance components in mixed models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a log-normal mean.

TL;DR: The modified signed log‐likelihood ratio method produces a confidence interval with a nearly exact coverage probability and highly accurate and symmetric error probabilities even for extremely small sample sizes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tolerance intervals in a two-way nested model with mixed or random effects

TL;DR: In this paper, Krishnamoorthy and Mathew derived a one-sided tolerance interval in a two-way nested model with mixed or random effects using the generalized confidence interval idea.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inferences on the mean response in a log-regression model: the generalized variable approach.

TL;DR: Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed confidence intervals have satisfying coverage probabilities and are an ideal candidate for making inferences about the mean response in a log‐regression model.
Related Papers (5)