Urban Politics in the Local Kingdoms of India: A View from the Princely Capitals of Saurashtra under British Rule

TLDR: A substantial body of literature argues persuasively that Indian towns were often founded by local political-military rulers to serve as fortress-headquarters as mentioned in this paper, in order to enhance their personal prestige, improve the efficiency of their administration, and provide market facilities for their small kingdoms.

Abstract: A Substantial body of literature argues persuasively that Indian towns were often founded by local political-military rulers to serve as fortress-headquarters. In order to enhance their personal prestige, improve the efficiency of their administration, and provide market facilities for their small kingdoms, the rulers later invited merchants, artisans, administrators, and professionals to the fortress capitals. These invited, non-landed groups then formed courts, markets, and temple establishments which were dependent on the ruler for protection in an often violent atmosphere. The headquarters towns have been seen as the geographical locus and political nexus, or hinge, at which village levels of polity were linked with regional or state levels of government in a predominantly agrarian society. The most explicit and sophisticated presentation of this ‘hinge’ view is in Richard Fox's ‘Rajput “Clans” and Rurban Settlements in Northern India.'