scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Virtue and Knowledge: Connatural Knowledge According to Thomas Aquinas

Taki Suto
- 01 Feb 2004 - 
- Vol. 58, Iss: 1, pp 61-79
TLDR
The notion of "connatural knowledge" was introduced by Thomas Aquinas as mentioned in this paper, who argued that there are two different ways to attain correct judgment: by perfect use of reason and by a kind of connaturality with the matter about which one has to judge.
Abstract
THOMAS AQUINAS INSISTS that there are two different ways to attain correct judgment. One is by way of "perfect use of reason," and another is by way of "connaturality" (connaturalitas): Wisdom denotes a certain rectitude of judgment according to the Divine ideas. Now rectitude of judgment is twofold: first, on account of perfect use of reason, secondly, on account of a kind of connaturality with the matter about which one has to judge. Thus, about matters of chastity, a man who has learnt the science of morals judges rightly through inquiry by reason, while he who has the habit of chastity judges rightly of such matters by a kind of connaturality. Accordingly it belongs to the wisdom that is an intellectual virtue to form a right judgment about divine things through inquiry by reason, but it belongs to wisdom as a gift of the Holy Spirit to form a right judgment about them on account of a kind of connaturality with them: thus Dionysius says, in Chapter Two of On the Divine Names, that Hierotheus is perfect in divine things, for he not only learns, but he also receives divine things. Now this sympathy or connaturality for divine things is the result of charity, which unites us to God, according to 1 Cor. vi. 17: He who is joined to the Lord, is one spirit. (1) Aquinas refers to the latter mode of cognition, that is, that by connaturality, by different names. Sometimes he calls it "judgment by inclination" (2) and other times "affective cognition" (cognitio affectiva) (3) or "experiential cognition" (cognitio experimentalis). (4) "Cognition" (cognitio) in Aquinas is a generic notion applicable to different cognitive activities and their results, comprising both apperehension and judgment. Based on the text quoted above, scholars often call this mode of cognition "connatural knowledge." As observed in the text, connatural knowledge is, to be exact, "judgment by connaturality." The modes of this cognition are twofold: (i) "He who has the habit of chastity judges rightly of such matters [of chastity] by a kind of connaturality." (5) (ii) "Because where there is the greater charity, there is the more desire; and desire in a certain degree makes the one desiring apt and prepared to receive the object desired. Hence he who possesses the more charity, will see God the more perfectly, and will be the more beatified." (6) These texts tell us that the virtues of the cognizer such as chastity (which is, according to Aquinas, a part of temperance, (7) namely one of the moral virtues) and charity (which is one of the theological virtues (8)) play a crucial role in our attainment of moral and religious cognition; only those who have particular virtues have dispositions for cognition of the things related to the virtues. Thanks to the dispositions, one can come to know these things rightly and more perfectly. Whether the cognizer has a connaturality brought by some virtue makes a difference in the mode of his cognition and, furthermore, according to Aquinas's account (9) (which I will explain later), this connaturality is a sort of love (amor). He also says that love brings desire (desiderium) to the thing loved and also joy (gaudium) when desire is fulfilled. (10) Moreover, connatural knowledge can be characterized as noninferential since it is contrasted with "the perfect use of reason" or "inquiry by reason." Aquinas distinguishes "reason" in the strict sense from "intellect" in its function of inference. (11) These features, namely, particularity, affectivity, and noninferentiality, are what virtue epistemology (12) has been recently trying to defend as components of human knowledge. Indeed, Linda Zagzebski, one of the major virtue epistemologists, pays much attention to Aquinas's notion of prudence (prudentia) (3) as well as to Aristotle's practical wisdom (phronesis) in her book Virtues of the Mind. …

read more

Citations
More filters
DissertationDOI

The impact of Ockham's "Nominalism" on his understanding of human nature and the imago dei in man, in comparison with Aquinas, bonaventure and scotus

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the consequences for understanding of human nature in theology and philosophy arising from the 'necessitarian crisis' of the 13th century, which was caused by official reaction to misappropriation of Aristotle by some philosophers and theologians, resulting in the Paris 'Condemnations' of 1270 and 1277.

A Constructive Account of Children's Moral Agency Drawing on Thomas Aquinas's Theory of Emotions

TL;DR: Deigh as mentioned in this paper argued that children need to learn to recognize when they have done wrong and to atone and make reparation for their wrongs, but that is not the only foundation of morality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anscombe's Moral Epistemology and the Relevance of Wittgenstein's Anti-Scepticism

TL;DR: Anscombe is coneguda per la seva insistencia que hi ha accions absolutament prohibides, tot i que no esta molt segura de per que es aixi as mentioned in this paper.

Virtue Before Knowledge: Docilis as Vice in Jerome

Douglas Estes
TL;DR: In the post-Enlightenment Western world, knowledge is the medicine that can cure the ills of the world as mentioned in this paper, and therefore, it is not only teachable but also teachable when they are young; they become incorrigible once they are old, they are like patients, stupid and without courage, who tremble at the sight of medicine.