scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated

Oluf Langhelle
- 01 Oct 2000 - 
- Vol. 2, Iss: 4, pp 303-322
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, it is argued that there are significant differences between the concepts of ecological modernization and sustainable development and that conflating them is not only counterproductive for the broader agenda of sustainable development, but also for the environmental policies necessary for realizing sustainable development.
Abstract
In this paper, it is argued that there are significant differences between the concepts of ecological modernization and sustainable development. The different ways in which these concepts frame various approaches to environmental policy have important implications. They affect not only the scope, but also the goals, targets and level of ambition that environmental policy-makers should aim at. Ecological modernization should be seen as a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for sustainable development. Conflating the two is not only counterproductive for the broader agenda of sustainable development, but also for the environmental policies necessary for realizing sustainable development. Therefore, ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

read more

Citations
More filters
MonographDOI

Why we disagree about climate change : understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity

TL;DR: Hulme as discussed by the authors uses different standpoints from science, economics, faith, psychology, communication, sociology, politics and development to explain why we disagree about climate change and shows that climate change, far from being simply an 'issue' or a 'threat', can act as a catalyst to revise our perception of our place in the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a visual representation of sustainable development as an essentially contested concept that may counter the rhetorically powerful organizing representations, in order to avoid the pitfalls of conflating opposing positions that are cloaked within the comforting rhetoric.
Journal ArticleDOI

The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis

TL;DR: There is a need to develop a clearer understanding of what the social pillar of sustainable development means and how it relates to the environmental pillar as discussed by the authors, and this article contributes to this proces.
Journal ArticleDOI

The politics of sustainability transitions

TL;DR: Sustainability transitions are processes of fundamental social change in response to societal challenges (Grin, Rotmans, & Schot, 2010; Markard, Raven, & Truffer, 2012) as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Our common future

Book

The politics of environmental discourse

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the emergence and increasing political importance of "ecological modernization" as a new concept in the language of environmental politics, which has come to replace the antagonistic debates of the 1970s, stresses the opportunities of environmental policy for modernizing the economy and stimulating the technological innovation.
Book

The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors make sense of the Earth's politics and make a distinction between Leave it to the Experts: Administrative Rationalism 5. Leave It to the People: Democratic Pragmatism 6. Environmentalally Benign Growth: Sustainable Development 7. Industrial Society and Beyond.
Book

Blueprint for a green economy

TL;DR: The meaning of sustainable development is defined in this article as "the value of the environment" and "valuing the environment", and it is defined as "a way of thinking about the future rather than the past".