Are the 2 strategies of emotion regulation evaluative and repressed?
Best insight from top research papers
The abstracts do not provide a clear answer to whether the two strategies of emotion regulation, evaluative and repressed, are present. However, the abstracts do mention two specific emotion regulation strategies: expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. These strategies are associated with different outcomes in terms of cardiovascular activity and psychological stress. Expressive suppression is associated with higher blood pressure and pulse rate, while cognitive reappraisal is associated with lower blood pressure, pulse rate, and psychological stress . Additionally, cognitive reappraisal is found to be linked to lower burnout, while emotional suppression is associated with higher burnout among healthcare residents . These findings suggest that different emotion regulation strategies have divergent effects on various outcomes, but the abstracts do not specifically address the evaluative and repressed strategies of emotion regulation.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The paper does not mention the specific strategies of emotion regulation as evaluative and repressed. | |
1 Citations | The paper does not mention the terms "evaluative" or "repressed" in relation to the two emotion regulation strategies (expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal). |
| The paper does not explicitly mention whether the two emotion regulation strategies, emotion suppression and cognitive reevaluation, are evaluative and repressed. | |
| The paper does not mention whether the two emotion regulation strategies, expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal, are evaluative and repressed. |
Related Questions
How does emotion regulation relate to self-esteem?5 answersEmotion regulation is closely related to self-esteem. Efficient emotion regulation strategies, such as cognitive reappraisal, are positively correlated with self-esteem. On the other hand, less adaptive emotion regulation strategies, like internal dysfunctional regulation, are associated with lower self-esteem. Self-esteem partially mediates the relationship between cognitive reappraisal and resilience, as well as fully mediates the association of expressive suppression with resilience. Self-esteem also mediates the effect of emotion regulation on different forms of anger, such as trait anger and anger rumination. Additionally, self-esteem is negatively correlated with negative consequences of problematic internet use, which is associated with higher emotional dysregulation. In summary, effective emotion regulation strategies are linked to higher self-esteem, while less adaptive strategies are associated with lower self-esteem and higher emotional dysregulation.
What are the specific domains of emotion regulation for research?5 answersEmotion regulation research has identified several specific domains of emotion regulation. These domains include perceived limited access to emotion regulation strategies, nonacceptance of emotional responses, emotional clarity, avoiding situations, developing competences, redirecting attention, reappraisal, suppression, respiration, venting, and seeking social support. Additionally, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) measures individual tendencies to reappraise and suppress the expression of emotions, as well as expressive enhancement. The study of emotion regulation has also focused on the resources required for particular emotion regulation strategies, such as working memory and social support. These specific domains of emotion regulation provide a framework for understanding how individuals regulate their emotions in various contexts and can inform future research in the field.
How is emotion regulation related to conflict strategies in relationships?5 answersEmotion regulation is related to conflict strategies in relationships. Teachers who have a greater ability to regulate emotions tend to use integrating and compromising strategies more frequently to manage classroom conflicts. Individual differences, such as emotional intelligence, the person involved in the conflict, situational sense of control, and the individual's aim in dealing with the conflict, also influence the choice of emotion regulation strategy. The level of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression, which are adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, respectively, can impact the choice of conflict resolution strategies. In the context of borderline personality disorder, individuals with emotion regulation difficulties are more likely to experience interpersonal conflicts. However, the directionality of the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and interpersonal problems is complex and may vary depending on the specific context.
What are the effects of selecting certain emotional regulation strategies?2 answersThe effects of selecting certain emotional regulation strategies vary depending on the specific strategy chosen. Habitual use of suppression has been linked to flatter diurnal cortisol slopes (DCS) in midlife. Emotional acceptance, another emotion regulation strategy, did not moderate the DCS in older adults. The simultaneous use of Situation selection and Emotional suppression has been found to cancel the beneficial impact of Situation selection on negative experience, while significantly increasing the impact on cardiac activity. Reappraisal has been shown to be effective in decreasing emotional experience, skin conductance response, and P300 amplitude. Acceptance is almost as effective as reappraisal but leads to increased emotional experience. The selection of emotion regulation strategies is often dictated by what individuals want to feel, with people motivated to decrease emotional intensity more likely to select strategies tailored for decreasing emotions, and those motivated to increase emotional intensity more likely to select strategies tailored for increasing emotions.
What are the motivations for individuals to select a particular emotional regulation strategy?3 answersIndividuals are motivated to select a particular emotional regulation strategy based on various factors. One factor is the specific emotions evoked by a stimulus, which can influence the choice between reappraisal and distraction. Another factor is the desire to benefit oneself or others. People may regulate others' emotions to benefit their own goal pursuit or to benefit others' goals. Values also play a role, as individuals with high care and concern for others are more likely to regulate a friend's emotions prosocially. Cultural differences can also influence the motivations for emotional regulation, as seen in Chinese children who reported greater willingness to show emotions in a peer context compared to a family context. Additionally, instrumental motives can drive individuals to regulate the emotions of others for personal benefits, even if it means making others feel worse.
Longitudinal study of emotion regulation strategies?5 answersEmotion regulation strategies were investigated in several longitudinal studies. One study focused on L2 learners and found that their use of emotion regulation strategies changed over time, with a decrease in distraction and suppression and an increase in self-regulated learning strategies and reassurance. Another study examined early adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic and found that rumination, specifically brooding, was associated with elevated waking cortisol and a blunted cortisol awakening response, while reflection was associated with lower waking cortisol and suppression was associated with a steeper cortisol awakening response. A large-scale observational study found that the expression of negative affect increased throughout the day, but for individuals who suppress emotion, this increase was slower. Those with stronger cognitive reappraisal abilities showed a trend for higher positive affect and a slower increase in negative affect. Additionally, a meta-analytic review found a moderate relationship between dissociation and emotion regulation, suggesting that dissociation may contribute to the over-modulation of emotional states through avoidance reactions.