Search or ask a question

Definition of node connectivity of blockchain networks?

Switched communication network

Node (networking)

Steiner tree problem

Broadcast communication network

Communication endpoint

Best insight from top research papers

Node connectivity in blockchain networks refers to the ability of nodes to establish connections and communicate with each other within the network. It is crucial for the efficient processing of transactions and the overall scalability of the system. Enhancing node connectivity can significantly improve the success ratio of transactions and reduce confirmation latency. Various methods have been proposed to achieve this, such as restructuring the network typology, incentivizing marginalized or dissociative nodes to join the system, and implementing traffic distribution methods that ensure balanced usage of network capacity. These approaches aim to create a well-connected network where nodes can easily establish connections and route transactions effectively.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Improving transaction succeed ratio in payment channel networks via enhanced node connectivity and balanced channel capacity Jianan Guo, Zhaojie Wang, Hai Liang, Minghao Zhao, Hui An, Yilei Wang - Show less +5 more 05 Aug 2022-International Journal of Intelligent Systems	The paper proposes enhancing node connectivity in payment channel networks to improve transaction success ratio and efficiency.
Open access•Book Chapter•DOI 2-Node-Connectivity Network Design Zeev Nutov 09 Sep 2020 6 Citations	The paper does not provide a definition of node connectivity of blockchain networks.
Open access•Posted Content $2$-node-connectivity network design Zeev Nutov 10 Feb 2020-arXiv: Data Structures and Algorithms 10 Citations	The paper does not provide a definition of node connectivity of blockchain networks.
Patent Connections of nodes on different networks Aaron Kunze, James W. Edwards, Christian Dreke - Show less +2 more 15 Sep 2004 22 Citations	The paper does not provide a definition of node connectivity of blockchain networks.
Patent Node and communication connecting method between nodes Soo Hyung Lee, Hyung Kook Jun, Kyung-Il Kim, Kyeong Tae Kim, Je Man Park, Yong Yeon Kim, Won-Tae Kim - Show less +6 more 16 Feb 2015	The paper does not provide a definition of node connectivity in blockchain networks.

My columns

Related Questions

The past condition or event or history state of node in biology network?4 answersThe past condition or event or history state of a node in a biological network can be determined using node interference analysis and node robustness analysis. These centrality-based measures allow for the characterization of the topological relationships between nodes and groups of nodes within the network. Node interference analysis helps determine the context of functional influence of single nodes, while node robustness analysis identifies the nodes with the highest functional influence on a specific node. These measures have been applied to a protein-protein interaction network regulating integrin activation in human primary leukocytes, successfully predicting the functional effects of compounds inhibiting important protein kinases. The interference and robustness notions can be applied to various contexts, such as identifying potential side effects of drugs or characterizing the consequences of gene deletion, duplication, or protein degradation.

Connectivity in graphs theory and application?5 answersThe concept of connectivity in graph theory has both theoretical and practical applications. In terms of theory, researchers have characterized graphs with connected 2-distance graphs, proving that for graphs with diameter 2, the 2-distance graph is connected if and only if the graph has no spanning complete bipartite subgraphs. For graphs with a diameter greater than 2, a maximal Fine set is defined, and by contracting the graph on these subsets, a new graph is obtained where the 2-distance graph is connected if and only if the 2-distance graph of the new graph is connected. In practical applications, the connectivity of bicycle networks is crucial for ridership, safety, and equity. Using level of traffic stress (LTS) and graph theory concepts, researchers have measured the network connectivity for different types of riders and identified network needs and barriers based on these rider types.

What influence does node connectivity has on the decentralization of a layer 1 blockchain network?4 answersNode connectivity plays a crucial role in the decentralization of a layer 1 blockchain network. The degree of decentralization is influenced by the topology of the network and the connectivity between nodes.The presence of hub-like nodes, such as relay gateways, negatively impacts the decentralization degree of blockchain networks.In a blockchain system, the number of full nodes storing the entire history data of the network affects decentralization.Rational nodes may discard history data, leading to a decrease in the number of full nodes and weakening decentralization.Monitoring the dynamism of nodes on the network is essential to understand the potential system mechanisms and address security risks that result in a weak network structure.Therefore, node connectivity directly influences the level of decentralization in a layer 1 blockchain network.

What influence does the number of nodes have on the security of a layer 1 blockchain network?3 answersThe number of nodes in a layer 1 blockchain network can have a significant influence on its security. As the number of nodes increases, it becomes more difficult for an attacker to launch certain types of attacks, such as the 51% attack, Finney attack, and Sybil attack. This is because the more nodes there are, the more computing power is added to the network, making it harder for an attacker to overpower the network's hash computing power. Additionally, a larger number of nodes can contribute to a more distributed and decentralized network, which can enhance the security and resilience of the blockchain. Therefore, having a higher number of nodes in a layer 1 blockchain network can generally improve its security and make it more resistant to attacks.

What influence does the node connectivity have on the security of a layer 1 blockchain network?3 answersNode connectivity has a significant influence on the security of a layer 1 blockchain network. The security of a proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain, which relies on the honest-majority assumption, can be undermined by factors such as network connectivity, presence of blockchain forks, and mining strategy. Block synchronization is crucial for maintaining blockchain security, and the impact of peering nodes on synchronization has been studied using game theory and large deviation theory. The use of blockchain consensus result feedback enhances the credibility between network nodes and enables secure communication. Additionally, the construction of a layered network security authenticator using blockchain technologies can provide strict security and validity guarantees for Internet of Everything networks.

What is node in PI network?5 answers

See what other people are reading

What is fixed automation?

Fixed automation refers to the utilization of specialized equipment or machinery that is set up to perform specific tasks repeatedly without the need for manual intervention. This type of automation is characterized by its dedicated nature, where the equipment is designed to carry out a particular function or set of functions autonomously. Examples of fixed automation devices include automatic fixed devices for workpiece machining, fixed automatic lifting platforms, and fixed automatic chucks. These systems are engineered to streamline processes, enhance efficiency, and ensure consistent output quality. Fixed automation is known for its simplicity, reliability, and ability to operate in a fully automatic mode, making it ideal for tasks that require repetitive actions in various working environments.What is partitioning in mesh analysis?

Partitioning in mesh analysis refers to the process of dividing the mesh representing a physical system among multiple processors or computing nodes in a parallel computer. This partitioning aims to distribute the computational workload evenly across the available resources while minimizing data exchange between partitions. Various techniques, such as graph partitioning and space-filling curve-based approaches, are employed to address the NP-complete mesh partitioning problem. The goal is to achieve load balancing, especially in large-scale simulations, by considering the capabilities of individual nodes, the heterogeneity of processors, and network infrastructures. Additionally, innovative models like Directed Sorted Heavy Edge Matching are introduced to reduce communication volume during Finite Element Method simulations and enhance efficiency in distributed systems.Impact of input data quantity (size) on AI outcomes?

The impact of input data quantity on AI outcomes varies across different contexts. In the realm of image processing systems within IoT, the size of input images significantly affects node offloading configurations, with larger images increasing communication costs. Time-dependency in data can lead to a decline in AI algorithm performance over time, where even an infinite amount of older data may not enhance predictions, emphasizing the importance of current data. For machine learning-based prediction schemes, an optimal number of input images exists to avoid overfitting, with an experiment finding 16 images as the most accurate prediction point. In freeway incident detection systems, the quantity and balance of real-world data samples impact the performance of AI models, highlighting the importance of data quantity in training ANN models.Impact of input data quantity (size) on AI predictionoutcomes?

The quantity of input data significantly impacts AI prediction outcomes. Research indicates that time-dependent data loses relevance over time, affecting algorithm performance and business value creation. In the context of predicting PM2.5 concentrations, the division of data into training and testing sets influences model performance, with specific ratios proving more suitable for accurate predictions. Additionally, in a study on mmWave signal strength prediction, the optimal number of input images for machine learning models was found to be crucial, as an excessive amount can lead to overfitting and reduced prediction accuracy. Moreover, in IoT image processing systems, the size of input images plays a significant role in determining the efficiency of node offloading configurations, with communication costs outweighing processing costs as image size increases.What is road condition?

Road condition refers to the state of a road surface, encompassing factors like distress, roughness, anti-sliding performance, and overall quality. Various inventions focus on measuring and adapting to road conditions. For instance, a road condition-adaptive metal detection device allows for underground metal detection while adjusting to different road conditions. Additionally, a road condition measurement system utilizes speed and acceleration data to calculate road indexes, enhancing precision in determining road conditions. Moreover, a road condition determining system incorporates vehicle position determination, vertical acceleration sensing, and calibration parameters to assess road conditions and transmit maintenance data. These innovations aim to enhance road safety, maintenance, and overall driving experience by effectively monitoring and responding to road conditions.What are the issue with using the standard in-line power consumption in cooja when simulating rpl attacks on sensors?

The use of standard in-line power consumption metrics in Cooja when simulating RPL (Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) attacks on sensors presents several issues, as highlighted across various research contexts. Firstly, the simulation of excessive loads on embedded devices, such as those caused by Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, reveals that standard power consumption metrics may not accurately reflect the dynamic and complex nature of power usage during such attacks. This is particularly evident in experiments that show peak power draining occurs with a specific malicious-node-to-sensor device ratio, suggesting that power consumption patterns can vary significantly under attack conditions. Moreover, the efficiency of identifying malicious activity through power consumption benchmarks, as explored in stack-based approaches for locating malicious nodes, indicates that relying solely on standard power metrics may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the security landscape within wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The implementation of RPL-related attacks and the simulation of hybrid attack scenarios further complicate the power consumption analysis, as these activities introduce variable attack timings and severities that standard metrics may not capture effectively. Additionally, the development of frameworks for predicting and detecting attacks in real-time IoT healthcare networks underscores the limitations of standard power consumption metrics in identifying and mitigating the impacts of routing attacks on network energy use. The challenges faced under Cooja simulator while analyzing RPL for dense network simulations also highlight the inadequacies of standard power consumption metrics in addressing issues related to network density and scalability. Furthermore, the exploration of power-efficient and secure routing protocols emphasizes the need for advanced security solutions that standard power metrics in Cooja may not support, particularly in the context of IoT networks where sensitive data protection is paramount. The proposal of Co-RPL as an extension to support mobility in RPL networks, which demonstrates significant improvements in packet loss ratio, average energy consumption, and end-to-end delay, further illustrates the limitations of standard power consumption metrics in evaluating the performance of mobility-supported networks. The introduction of novel objective functions for RPL that combine metrics linearly and lexically to improve network monitoring and QoS achievement also suggests that standard power consumption metrics may not adequately address the diverse constraints and high traffic applications of modern monitoring applications. Comparative studies of energy consumption measurements between RPL and other routing protocols, both in simulation and real testbed environments, reveal discrepancies that standard in-line power metrics in Cooja may not fully account for. Lastly, the behavioral analysis of network components under attack conditions in 6LoWPAN networks highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of power consumption patterns that go beyond standard metrics, especially in identifying indicators of compromise and implementing appropriate countermeasures. In summary, the reliance on standard in-line power consumption metrics in Cooja simulations of RPL attacks on sensors is fraught with limitations, including inaccuracies in reflecting complex power usage patterns under attack conditions, inadequacies in capturing the security landscape of WSNs, and insufficiencies in evaluating the performance of networks with advanced features such as mobility support and high traffic applications.How gossip a source of information?

To disseminate information via gossip, a source node initially sends updates to a subset of nodes, which then share this information through gossiping to further propagate it. The nodes estimate the source information using the majority rule at the end of the gossiping period. The system behavior is analyzed under both high and low gossip rates, where high rates lead to nodes behaving collectively based on majority information, while low rates introduce the concept of gossip gain to reduce average errors. Additionally, an adaptive policy is developed for the source to adjust its transmission capacity based on past rates and node accuracy, optimizing information dissemination. This process ensures timely and accurate information flow within the network of gossiping agents.What are the positive impact of Space Travel in terms of Data Collection for Satellite communication companies?

Space travel has positively impacted data collection for satellite communication companies by enabling efficient processing and distribution of vast amounts of mapping information. Advanced technologies like distributed application coordination and multi-level caching ensure uninterrupted data reception and processing, even in the event of machine node failures. Additionally, the augmentation of positioning data through shuttle messages exchanged between GPS-enabled devices enhances the overall data quality and coverage. To address the challenge of data overload on communication satellites, innovative approaches like collaborative data offloading algorithms have been developed, ensuring balanced data distribution among satellites and efficient downloading to ground stations, leading to high throughput and low energy consumption. These advancements facilitate real-time data services and enable the collection and forwarding of substantial data volumes, enhancing the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of satellite communication systems.What are the positive impact of Space Travel in terms of Live Broadcasting for Media and entertainment industry?

Space travel has positively impacted live broadcasting for the media and entertainment industry by enabling the delivery of live video streams from space to Earth for global distribution. This advancement has allowed for the transmission of important space missions as webcasts, creating a new phenomenon online and spreading space culture to the public. Additionally, space travel has provided astronauts with growth-enhancing experiences, leading to a more positive view of Earth and humanity, which can be shared through live broadcasts. Furthermore, innovative space-based network broadcasting methods have been developed to optimize satellite bandwidth and message transmission efficiency, enhancing the quality of live broadcasts from space. These combined impacts showcase how space travel has revolutionized live broadcasting, offering unique perspectives and content for the media and entertainment industry.What is one line diagram in power system?

A one-line diagram in a power system is a simplified visual representation that shows the main components and connections of the system in a single line. It includes substations, power lines, equipment types, and their interconnections. These diagrams are crucial in Energy Management Systems (EMS) for designing, monitoring, analyzing, and controlling power systems. Traditionally, creating these diagrams manually is time-consuming and prone to errors, leading to the need for automated tools that can generate accurate representations based on Common Information Model (CIM) standards. By automatically computing component coordinates and connectivity relations, these tools can efficiently produce one-line diagrams that closely resemble real power system configurations.What machine learning techniques use for network analysis in blockchain?

Machine learning techniques utilized for network analysis in blockchain include decentralized machine learning models coordinated through blockchain platforms, multi-party machine learning model processing with encrypted data storage on blockchain networks, and anti-discrimination validation using machine learning models recorded in blockchain transactions. Additionally, techniques for automatic convergence of computer network infrastructures involve network devices communicating and generating consensus through blockchain mechanisms for configuration changes. Furthermore, a neural network enabled interface server and blockchain interface are employed for event detection, tracking, and compliance management in blockchain networks, enhancing anomaly detection and compliance reporting. These approaches leverage blockchain technology to enhance security, efficiency, and reliability in machine learning-based network analysis within blockchain systems.