scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Do geopolitical risks and oil prices affect green energy stocks? 


Best insight from top research papers

Geopolitical risks and oil prices significantly influence green energy stocks, as evidenced by various studies. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, has shown that clean and alternative energy stocks are crucial for diversification, though they are negatively impacted by volatility indices induced by infectious diseases, highlighting the importance of considering geopolitical risks in renewable energy markets . Similarly, geopolitical tensions have been identified as a determinant affecting the success of green investments, with empirical evidence suggesting that geopolitical risk measurably affects green investments in both the short and long term . The Russo-Ukrainian Conflict specifically illustrates how war risks can lead to spikes in oil prices, positively affecting stock returns for renewables due to increased oil prices, thereby potentially incentivizing investment in the renewable sector . Moreover, global geopolitical risks have been found to asymmetrically affect the correlation network of global stock markets, including those related to green energy, indicating the interconnectedness of geopolitical risks and financial markets . Geopolitical events also influence oil price volatility, which in turn affects stock market volatility, including stocks related to green energy. An increase in geopolitical risk is associated with negative stock returns, suggesting that geopolitical events can disrupt supply and impact green energy investments . Oil price shocks and policy uncertainty further impact the stock returns of clean energy companies, with oil supply shocks having a positive effect, while policy uncertainty shocks have a negative effect . Interestingly, while oil price fluctuations are traditionally linked to energy stock returns, renewable energy stocks show a disconnection from oil market shocks, suggesting a shift towards renewable sources might reduce exposure to oil price volatility . However, geopolitical risks and uncertainties can have heterogeneous effects on financial markets across different regions, affecting investor behavior and stock market indices in developing Asian countries, indicating the complex relationship between geopolitical risks, oil prices, and green energy stocks . The interconnectedness between geopolitical risk and renewable energy volatility further underscores the influence of geopolitical events on green energy sectors, with the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine-Russia conflicts serving as examples of how such risks can affect renewable energy dynamics . Lastly, the strategic importance of critical minerals for green energy transition, especially in the electric vehicle industry, highlights how geopolitical risks can intensify due to resource dependency on countries with significant control over these minerals, affecting the green transition's geopolitical risk landscape .

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
Not addressed in the paper.
Geopolitical risks, like war, can impact oil prices, affecting green energy stocks positively due to increased renewable investments and potential government policies promoting energy transition.
Geopolitical risks significantly impact renewable energy investments, as indicated by the research. The paper does not directly address the influence of oil prices on green energy stocks.
Geopolitical risks and oil prices negatively impact green energy stocks, as shown in the study through quantile regression analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Related Questions

Geopolitical risks to renewable energy stock returns?6 answersGeopolitical risks significantly influence renewable energy stock returns, as evidenced by a body of research spanning various aspects of the energy sector and financial markets. Floros et al. have demonstrated that geopolitical tensions can have a measurable impact on green investments, indicating that geopolitical risk is a critical factor for renewable energy financing and development. This is corroborated by Agoraki et al., who found that geopolitical risks negatively affect stock returns, with a substantial decrease in returns following a one-unit standard deviation increase in geopolitical risks. Renewable energy markets, including sub-sectors, exhibit varying responses to geopolitical risk (GPR) and economic uncertainty indices (EUI), suggesting that renewable energies can serve as a hedge against these risks under certain conditions. However, the impact of geopolitical events on stock returns can differ based on the specific context, such as the North Korean regime's influence on inter-Korean economic cooperation-related firms. The transition to renewable energy, driven by competition for resources essential for renewable technologies, introduces new geo-economic dynamics that could destabilize economies dependent on fossil fuel exports. The Russo-Ukrainian Conflict highlighted the positive effect of rising oil prices on renewable energy stock returns in China, suggesting that geopolitical conflicts affecting oil prices could indirectly benefit the renewable sector. The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on clean energy stocks further illustrates how global crises, including geopolitical tensions, can influence renewable energy markets. The war in Ukraine in 2022 demonstrated renewable energy markets' resilience, with positive and significant cumulative abnormalities observed in the aftermath. Literature reviews on the geopolitics of renewable energy have identified both potential security benefits and risks associated with the transition to renewables, including concerns over critical materials and cybersecurity. However, Overland argues against overstating these risks, suggesting that the geopolitical implications of renewable energy's rise may be more nuanced and less dire than some forecasts imply. Collectively, these studies underscore the complex and multifaceted relationship between geopolitical risks and renewable energy stock returns, highlighting the need for nuanced understanding and strategic planning in the face of geopolitical uncertainties.
Geopolitical risks to green stock returns?4 answersGeopolitical risks significantly influence green stock returns, as evidenced by a comprehensive analysis of various studies. The interdependence between geopolitical risk and stock returns is notably pronounced, with geopolitical risk generally reducing stock returns in North-East Asia, highlighting the broader impact geopolitical tensions can have on financial markets. Specifically, in South Korea, corporate stock returns respond negatively to geopolitical risk, particularly for large firms and those with a higher share of domestic investors. This trend is not isolated to Asia; a broader study across 22 countries found that geopolitical risks decrease stock returns significantly, underscoring the global nature of this impact. The interconnectedness of global stock markets means that geopolitical risks can lead to risk contagion, affecting stock returns worldwide. This is particularly relevant for global geopolitical risks, which have been shown to influence the correlation network of global stock markets, suggesting an asymmetric relationship between geopolitical risk and global stock market correlation. The phenomenon of greenflation introduces new geopolitical risks, particularly for renewable energy investments, exacerbating risks already associated with the energy transition and potentially undermining cooperation between major economies. Investors face both internal and external geopolitical risks, with diplomacy, propaganda, economic incentives, trade wars, and sanctions being tools that can influence geopolitical landscapes and, by extension, green stock returns. The impact of geopolitical risk on economies of advanced countries further illustrates the broad economic implications of such risks. In the MENA region, geopolitical risk affects return and volatility dynamics, although it does not contribute to return spillovers among financial markets. Finally, geopolitical tensions have a measurable effect on renewable energy investments, indicating that geopolitical risk considerations are crucial for the success of green investments. Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of understanding and managing geopolitical risks to safeguard green stock returns.
Geopolitical risks and oil prices on the development of green investment?5 answersGeopolitical risks and oil prices play crucial roles in shaping the development of green investments. Studies highlight that geopolitical tensions have a significant impact on green investments in both the short and long run, emphasizing the need to consider these risks for successful renewable energy integration. Additionally, the response of green investments in emerging countries to own-market uncertainty, oil-market uncertainty, and external uncertainties like COVID-19 effects has been studied. Findings suggest that green returns are influenced by own-market uncertainty, oil-market uncertainty, and the COVID-19 effect, with evidence of hedging potential against external uncertainties, ultimately improving predictability and economic gains. Moreover, the phenomenon of "greenflation" introduces new geopolitical risks, exacerbating existing challenges associated with the energy transition, potentially leading to competition rather than cooperation in addressing climate change.
How does geopolitical risk affect financial markets?5 answersGeopolitical risk has a significant impact on financial markets. It affects the dependence between Islamic stocks and sukuk, as well as their conventional counterparts, with regional geopolitical risk factors having a stronger influence on conventional stock-bond correlation volatility. Geopolitics can also influence the success of IMF programs in stabilizing economies, leading to increased risk aversion among financial market participants and negative reactions in bond yields, exchange rates, and stock market developments. Global geopolitical risks have an asymmetric relationship with the global stock market correlation network, with quantile-on-quantile regression analysis revealing the impact of geopolitical risk on the connectedness of global stock markets. Geopolitical crises, particularly in the energy sector, have demonstrated the significant impact on the financial capital market, emphasizing the importance of diversification and risk management in investment portfolios. Overall, understanding and managing geopolitical risks are crucial for financial stability, asset allocation, and policy formulation.
How do geopolitical risks affect stock prices?3 answersGeopolitical risks have a negative impact on stock prices. Studies have shown that an increase in geopolitical risks leads to a decrease in stock returns. The magnitude of this effect can range from 10.53% to 42.14% of the sample mean. This negative relationship between geopolitical risks and stock market performance is observed in various countries, including China. The effects of geopolitical risk on stock returns are nonlinear and asymmetric, depending on factors such as time, volatility regimes, and specific stock markets. Geopolitical risk also affects real activity, capital flows, and stock returns, with the threat of adverse geopolitical events having a particularly strong impact. Overall, geopolitical risks have a detrimental effect on stock prices, leading to lower returns and increased market volatility.
What are the implications of energy trade dynamics for geopolitical risk?3 answersEnergy trade dynamics have significant implications for geopolitical risk. The studies show that there is a strong connection between energy markets and geopolitical risk. Geopolitical risk shocks, such as conflicts and tensions, can have an immediate and pronounced effect on energy markets. Geopolitical risk increases the cost of spot charter rates for liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) carriers, impacting both companies and countries involved in the liquefied gas trade. Geopolitical events, such as wars and conflicts, can lead to an increase in energy trade volume, while international tension can cause a decline in energy trade. The impact of geopolitics on energy trade is heterogeneous, with different responses depending on the type of event. These findings have implications for policymakers and investors in clean energy markets.

See what other people are reading

What are the negative effect of gradual return to old calendar on education?
5 answers
The negative effects of a gradual return to the old school calendar on education can be significant. Research indicates that modifications to the academic calendar, such as reducing the school year, can lead to worsened academic performance. In times of crisis, like a negative trade shock, unemployed workers may delay returning to education, impacting their labor market outcomes. Additionally, studies on modified school calendars suggest that the quality of evidence supporting such changes is weak, with only a small average effect size on academic achievement, particularly for economically disadvantaged students. Moreover, altering school calendars without proper planning can lead to increased energy costs, affecting resources available for educational purposes. These findings highlight the importance of carefully considering the implications of reverting to previous school calendar structures.
How can family structure affects the personal behavior of a child?
5 answers
Family structure significantly influences a child's behavior. Research suggests that children in stable married families tend to have fewer behavior problems compared to those in non-traditional family structures. Factors such as parental selectivity, resource deficiencies, and family characteristics like stress and parental behavior play crucial roles in shaping child behavior. Positive family relationships based on mutual respect, love, and effective communication contribute to healthy personality development in children. Additionally, adolescents in intact families exhibit lower levels of deviant behavior and depression, with parental monitoring and school connectedness acting as mediating factors. Understanding these dynamics can guide interventions at the family and school levels to enhance child behavior and mental health outcomes.
Why Green Self-Identity Affects Cognitive Engagement??
5 answers
Green self-identity affects cognitive engagement due to its role in motivating pro-environmental behaviors and influencing consumer attitudes towards eco-friendly products. Studies show that green self-identity positively impacts behavioral intentions related to green energy purchase, eco-friendly apparel consumption, and green purchase behavior. This self-identity is influenced by individual values, peer influence, and affective connection to nature, leading individuals to prioritize environmental concerns and engage in sustainable practices. Specifically, cognitive involvement, environmental values, and peer influence contribute to the formation of green self-identity, which in turn influences cognitive engagement and patronage intentions towards environmentally friendly products. Understanding the link between green self-identity and cognitive engagement is crucial for marketers to tailor communication strategies and promote sustainable consumption effectively.
Give an example of forecasting in supply chain management and operations management ?
4 answers
Forecasting plays a crucial role in supply chain management and operations management. For instance, in the food industry, forecasting methods like moving averages and exponential smoothing are utilized to predict demand accurately, as seen in. Additionally, in logistics systems, quantile regression-based simulation approaches have been proven effective in computing multiperiod quantile forecasts, leading to significant cost reductions in supply chain operations. Moreover, in military logistics, accurate demand forecasting for spare parts is essential to maintain combat readiness and balance cost-effectiveness, especially with fluctuating demand based on equipment requirements. Overall, forecasting techniques such as time-series models, ARIMA, and Prophet have been employed to enhance supply chain management performance, with hybrid models like Prophet and ARIMA showing promising results in predicting future sales accurately.
Why Green Self-Identity Affects Cognitive Engagement?
5 answers
Green self-identity significantly influences cognitive engagement in environmental behaviors due to its deep-rooted connection with personal values, social perceptions, and the intrinsic motivation to align actions with a pro-environmental self-concept. This identity acts as a powerful mediator between knowledge of environmental issues and the actual green behaviors individuals choose to adopt. Studies have shown that individuals with a strong pro-environmental self-identity are more likely to engage in behaviors that are consistent with this identity, such as purchasing green energy or eco-friendly apparel, because these actions serve as expressions of their values and beliefs. The mechanism through which green self-identity affects cognitive engagement can be understood through several lenses. Firstly, it enhances the perceived value of green behaviors, making individuals more likely to see these actions as beneficial and in alignment with their self-concept. This perceived value is not limited to personal gain but extends to societal benefits, reinforcing the individual's commitment to pro-environmental actions. Moreover, green self-identity influences cognitive engagement by fostering a sense of moral obligation and self-accountability, where individuals feel personally responsible for the environmental impact of their actions. Furthermore, green self-identity can shape cognitive engagement through educational and social influences. Environmental education programs that focus on developing a pro-environmental identity have been shown to be effective in fostering ecologically responsible behavior, as they engage both automatic and controlled cognitive processes. Social influences, such as peer influence and social norms, also play a crucial role in reinforcing green self-identity and encouraging cognitive engagement with environmental issues. Interestingly, even when traditional nudges and interventions fail to significantly impact pro-environmental behaviors, the presence of a strong environmental self-identity consistently predicts participation in pro-environmental programs. This underscores the importance of internal motivations and self-concept in driving cognitive engagement with environmental sustainability.
Until what age can civic habits be formed?
5 answers
Civic habits can be formed from childhood through early adolescence and into adulthood. Research suggests that individuals' participatory habits are established by early adulthood, with childhood and early adolescent roots playing a crucial role in shaping civic attitudes and behaviors. Schools and after-school programs are highlighted as key environments for cultivating prosocial attitudes and behaviors related to civic engagement, starting as early as the elementary school years. Additionally, social connectedness within peer networks during early adolescence has been linked to higher civic efficacy and engagement in political behavior, emphasizing the importance of considering civic development within the peer context. Therefore, while civic habits can continue to evolve over time, the formative years of childhood and early adolescence are crucial for laying the groundwork for future civic engagement.
Enhancing Hydrological Accuracy through Advanced Rating Curves and Gauged Flow Modelling: The case of South Australian Catchments, Australia?
5 answers
Enhancing hydrological accuracy in South Australian catchments involves utilizing advanced rating curves and gauged flow modeling techniques. Studies have shown that employing machine learning models incorporating time as an input can simplify the development of rating curves, improving accuracy. Additionally, for ungauged catchments like Namal Lake, hydrological modeling using rainfall data can effectively predict inflows, aiding in flood forecasting and reservoir management. When selecting sites for soil moisture monitoring, multi-criteria decision-making methods like MIF and AHP can help identify optimal monitoring locations based on factors like rainfall, soil type, and land use, enhancing the overall hydrological understanding of catchments. By integrating these approaches, South Australian catchments can achieve more precise hydrological assessments and better water resource management.
What does supporting services mean in biodiversity?
5 answers
Supporting services in biodiversity refer to the crucial roles that diverse ecosystems play in providing stability and essential functions for the environment and human well-being. These services include soil stability, infiltration, nutrient cycling, and more. Urban biodiversity, for example, contributes to ecosystem services that benefit the physical health and well-being of city residents. Protecting biodiversity is essential for sustaining healthy ecosystems that deliver benefits to people, emphasizing the importance of diverse landscapes in supporting ecosystem services. The concept of ecosystem services has provided new opportunities for biodiversity conservation, such as influencing decision-making, adding value to protected areas, and managing ecosystems sustainably. Understanding and preserving these supporting services are vital for maintaining the health of ecosystems and ensuring their ability to provide essential benefits to both nature and society.
How many people remotely worked during covid 19 in the uk?
5 answers
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant number of individuals in the UK transitioned to remote working. Studies indicate that various groups engaged in remote work during this period. For instance, a study involving 204 full-time UK-based employees found that 92 participants exclusively worked from home during the pandemic. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of clinicians in UK ambulance services highlighted the shift to home working during the pandemic, with clinicians adapting to remote assessments and utilizing digital platforms. Furthermore, a study focusing on professional services staff in UK universities reported experiences of n = 4731 staff transitioning to remote work due to campus closures and social restrictions. Another study surveyed 143 staff members from corporate and non-clinical departments who worked from home during the pandemic in 2020, showcasing the impacts of remote work on productivity and well-being.
What are some common internal organizational factors that may impact the market orientation of non-profit organizations?
5 answers
Internal organizational factors that can influence the market orientation of non-profit organizations include interpersonal trust, connectedness, employee motivation, satisfaction, productivity, loyalty, and the adoption of business-like practices. Research suggests that fostering trust and connectedness among members within blood transfusion centers and services (BTCS) can enhance interfunctional coordination and donor orientation. Additionally, factors such as employee motivation, satisfaction, and loyalty play a crucial role in shaping internal marketing strategies, impacting employee productivity and commitment within non-profit organizations. Moreover, the adoption of business-like practices in NPOs has been linked to a potential shift towards market focus over mission, highlighting the delicate balance required for effective market orientation in the non-profit sector.
Does proximity to a gravel pit affect property value ?
5 answers
Proximity to gravel pits can indeed impact property values. Research in Ontario found no strong negative effect on property values from aggregate sites. Conversely, studies in Ohio highlighted significant property-value-suppressing effects near operational rock mines, with homes closer to the mines experiencing discounts of 2.3-5.1% on average. Further analysis in Ohio revealed that households, especially rich white ones, tend to choose houses farther from gravel pits and landfills, indicating a preference for distance from these environmental disamenities to enhance the fixed utility of the property. Additionally, the ecological impact of gravel excavation, such as filling pits with waste, can also influence property values negatively due to environmental concerns.