Do white collar worker fear replacement of AI?
Best insight from top research papers
White-collar workers do indeed fear replacement by AI. The integration of AI in workplaces can lead to changes in job roles, loss of status positions, and overall identity threat among employees. While robots handle assembly tasks in manufacturing, robotics process automation is gradually taking over repetitive tasks, highlighting the need for optimizing task allocation between humans and machines. Studies analyzing the impacts of AI and robotics on employment reveal that workers with adaptable high skills, especially in science and engineering, are more likely to complement new technologies, whereas occupation-specific skills related to human-intensive services are less likely to be replaced by AI. This fear of replacement underscores the importance of understanding the evolving dynamics between AI and human workers in the modern workplace.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access•Posted Content 4 Citations | White-collar workers with adaptable high skills from higher education, especially in science and engineering, are less likely to fear job replacement by AI and robotics, as per the survey data. |
Open access•Posted Content | White-collar workers with malleable high skills from science and engineering education are less fearful of AI and robotics replacing their jobs, as per the survey data analyzed. |
| White-collar workers may not fear AI replacement but can benefit from AI support in tasks like meeting minutes, optimizing task allocation for enhanced efficiency and collaboration. | |
| White-collar workers fear replacement by AI due to changes in work, loss of status, and threats to identity, as highlighted in the study on AI identity threat in the workplace. | |
29 Citations | White-collar workers face risks of AI replacing their jobs, as highlighted in the paper. This raises concerns about potential job displacement and the need for career reevaluation. |
Related Questions
Will ai replace developers ?5 answersAI, particularly generative AI tools like GitHub Copilot, shows potential to enhance human productivity in software development. The AI revolution in software development is imminent, requiring developers to adapt their skills to incorporate AI-based tools into their workflows. While AI can significantly impact the software engineering workforce by automating tasks currently done by developers, it is unlikely to entirely replace developers. The intersection of computational science and technological speculation suggests that AI may be perceived as a threat by some programmers. Future software engineers will need to possess a mix of technical and soft skills to remain relevant, as AI-assisted development continues to evolve the profession. Therefore, while AI will transform the role of developers, it is more likely to augment their capabilities rather than replace them entirely.
What are the effects of AI on white and blue collar worker?5 answersAI has varying effects on white and blue-collar workers. White-collar workers face risks of job displacement due to AI advancements, while blue-collar workers are subjected to algorithmic surveillance and productivity scoring tools powered by AI, impacting their human rights and dignity. However, AI also presents opportunities for workers' health improvement, as seen in a study where an AI-assisted health program effectively reduced musculoskeletal symptoms in workers. The evolution of AI in the workplace involves optimizing task allocation between humans and machines to enhance efficiency. Historical analysis suggests that while AI may initially generate employment through system bugs and troubleshooting, it ultimately leads to worker displacement as technology improves.
How does artificial intelligence anxiety affect innovative work behavior?4 answersArtificial intelligence anxiety has been found to have both positive and negative effects on innovative work behavior. On one hand, AI limitations can drive workers' innovative work behavior as a way to compensate for those limitations. Mistakes made by robots and the fear of AI can stimulate workers' innovative work behavior. Additionally, workers may be reskilled and upskilled to overcome AI limitations, and AI interfaces can stimulate worker engagement. On the other hand, AI anxiety can negatively affect learning motivations, particularly in terms of intrinsic motivation. However, AI job replacement anxiety can have a positive impact on extrinsic motivation. Overall, the relationship between AI anxiety and innovative work behavior is complex and can be influenced by various factors such as AI limitations, fear, reskilling, and job replacement concerns.
Why employees are hesitant to use Ai?5 answersEmployees are hesitant to use AI due to several reasons. Firstly, negative attitudes towards AI technologies can hinder their acceptance and adoption. Some employees prefer collaborating with real humans rather than virtual colleagues, leading to a preference for human interaction over AI. Secondly, concerns about job loss and fear of being replaced by AI technology contribute to employees' hesitancy. The perception that AI may lead to increased workload and manipulation further exacerbates this hesitation. Additionally, privacy concerns related to the use of AI-based technology can weaken employees' willingness to accept AI. Trust in AI technology and its service providers is also a factor that influences employees' attitudes towards AI. Overall, a combination of negative attitudes, fear of job loss, privacy concerns, and lack of trust contribute to employees' hesitancy in using AI technologies.
How ai will replace workers in the public sector?4 answersAI implementation in the public sector does not necessarily mean the complete replacement of human workers. Instead, it is believed that the relationship between humans and AI will be perfected over time to ensure the benefits for public organizations. AI has the potential to increase efficiency and effectiveness in the public sector by freeing up time for public servants to focus on high-value work. However, the implementation of AI in the public sector presents unique challenges, and governments are lagging behind the private sector in utilizing AI. The transformation brought about by AI implementation may include changes in recruitment plans, IT procurement, job roles, business models, policies, and regulations. The digital transformation of the public sector through AI implementation requires addressing methodological, theoretical, and application gaps in the public management literature. Overall, the impact of AI on workers in the public sector is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and challenges.
Why shouldn't AI replace humans in workplace?3 answersAI should not replace humans in the workplace because it can lead to distrust among workers and be perceived as a threat to their jobs. Instead, AI should be seen as a tool that can augment workers' abilities and enhance their skills. Coexistence between workers and AI requires a combination of technical, human, and conceptual skills. Ongoing reskilling and upskilling are necessary for workers to maintain a symbiotic relationship with AI. Introducing AI may negatively impact employees' identification with their jobs, as it can bring about changes to work and loss of status position. To ensure a more humane organizational culture, workers should have a central role in the design, implementation, and evaluation of AI technology. Additionally, transparency in AI-augmented settings is important, but the notion of full transparency may not be practical.