Doctors feedback on continuous vitals monitoring
Best insight from top research papers
Physicians generally view continuous vital sign monitoring positively, acknowledging its potential to enhance patient safety . They appreciate the early detection of patient deterioration, which can lead to timely interventions and improved outcomes. Continuous monitoring without alarms has been found feasible and acceptable by professionals, as it avoids alarm fatigue and allows for trend analysis by nurses and doctors. The introduction of wearable ambulatory monitoring devices has been met with enthusiasm by physicians, who see it as a tool for earlier identification of patient deterioration and improved interdisciplinary communication. While there are concerns about reduced patient contact and inappropriate escalations of care with continuous monitoring, the overall feedback from physicians indicates a willingness to embrace this technology for enhancing patient care.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Physician feedback on continuous vital signs monitoring can reduce variability, enhance perioperative outcomes, and promote quality improvement initiatives, fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement. | |
13 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
56 Citations | Doctors and healthcare professionals provided positive feedback on continuous vital sign monitoring, expecting earlier clinical deterioration identification and improved healthcare quality, safety, and efficiency. |
| Doctors found continuous vital sign monitoring without alarms feasible and beneficial, enabling faster response to patient changes and intervention effects, as indicated by the study's results. | |
69 Citations | Doctors were enthusiastic about continuous monitoring, anticipating earlier patient deterioration identification, improved interdisciplinary communication, and patient reassurance. Concerns included reduced nurse-patient interactions and potential care escalations. |
Related Questions
How to promote a feedback culture among employees in healthcare organisations?5 answersTo promote a feedback culture among employees in healthcare organizations, it is essential for leaders, especially CEOs, to foster an environment that encourages open communication and upward feedback. This can be achieved by being approachable, visible, and available to employees, which helps build trust and promote transparency. Additionally, creating a culture of safety where employees feel comfortable speaking up is crucial for organizational success. Feedback seminars can also be utilized to process and provide feedback systematically, initiating organizational change and improving health and work satisfaction among employees. Furthermore, utilizing various channels for feedback, such as voluntary events, surveys, and informal feedback, along with quality tools, can help in driving quality improvement based on patient feedback.
Is continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) useful for glycemic response in healthy individuals?4 answersContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown potential for glycemic response in healthy individuals. CGM systems can be used to study the effect of lifestyle factors on post-prandial glucose levels, improve nutritional and physical activity behavior, and optimize strategies for exercise. CGM data can provide information on glucose values and dynamics, helping to improve physical performance and regeneration. Additionally, CGM systems can be used for early detection of abnormal glucose regulation and to predict the progression of dysglycemia, allowing for primary prevention of type 2 diabetes. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of CGM in reducing glycated hemoglobin, time spent in hypoglycemia, and improving the quality of life for patients with diabetes. While more scientific studies are needed to improve the interpretation of CGM data, it is clear that CGM has potential for glycemic response in healthy individuals.
What are the vital signs that are properly recorded?5 answersVital signs that are properly recorded include respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood pressure, level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS), and temperature. These measurements are important as they provide an indication of the patient's physiological state and can help identify any derangement in their physiology. Vital signs are typically recorded upon arrival to the emergency department, on admission to a ward, at regular intervals during a patient's stay, and before, during, and after procedures. However, it has been found that the frequency of monitoring respiratory rate is significantly lower compared to other vital sign measurements. It is important to note that vital signs should not be considered in isolation but as part of a holistic assessment, which includes other observations and information from various sources.
What are the advantages of continuous monitoring with 12-lead EKG? what patients or diseases does this most help?4 answersContinuous monitoring with 12-lead EKG offers several advantages. It allows for the accurate detection of electrocardiographic parameters such as J point, PR, QT, and QRS, which are commonly monitored in patients with acute coronary syndromes or heart failure. This type of monitoring system can also be used to reconstruct 12-lead data from 3-lead monitoring data, providing accurate diagnoses and making it easier for patients and doctors to accept. Additionally, continuous monitoring with 12-lead EKG enables the establishment of personalized cardiac big data, offering new strategies and possibilities for cardiac health management. In patients with muscular dystrophy, a 12-lead EKG has been shown to be an effective modality for assessing cardiac status, particularly in identifying left bundle branch block and fragmented QRS, which are linked to cardiomyopathy. Overall, continuous monitoring with 12-lead EKG is beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, and muscular dystrophy, as it allows for accurate monitoring and assessment of cardiac health.
What are the subtypes of vital monitoring?5 answersVital monitoring systems can be classified into different subtypes based on their functionality and design. One subtype is a monitoring system that measures a plurality of vital signs using various sensors such as electrodes, piezoelectric sensors, temperature sensors, and accelerometers. Another subtype is a system that monitors human breathing and quality of sleep by measuring the capacitance of the body to a matrix of capacitive electrodes. Additionally, there are remote care systems that connect and communicate with a variety of devices, including sensors capable of gathering vitals data, and perform actions based on analyzing the data. A portable vital monitoring system is another subtype, which includes a stand-alone device with sensing devices for detecting and processing vital data, as well as a wireless communication module for connectivity. Finally, there are wearable, wireless, and mobile monitoring systems that have been evaluated for patient acceptability and are considered innovative healthcare monitoring systems.
What are the most common vital signs to monitor?4 answersThe most common vital signs to monitor are temperature, pulse rate (or heart rate), blood pressure, and respiratory rate. These vital signs are essential for assessing the basic body functions and are typically recorded in medical settings. Nurses traditionally rely on these vital signs to assess patients, but additional assessments such as pain, level of consciousness, and urine output are also proposed for a more comprehensive patient assessment. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is advocated, as trends are more significant than single measurements, especially in the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients. Although the measurement of these vital signs has been standard practice for over a century, there have been few attempts to quantify their clinical performance.