Documenting psychosocial attitudes of persons with aphasia following semantic-based therapy: an exploratory study
Best insight from top research papers
The psychosocial attitudes of persons with aphasia following semantic-based therapy were explored in various studies. One study focused on the experiences and perspectives of individuals with aphasia regarding self-management, highlighting the importance of community groups, communication partners, and speech-language pathologists in supporting self-management . Another study developed a semantic-based therapy named SCVTr, showing positive gains in word retrieval abilities for persons with aphasia . Additionally, a study personalized the dose of cued picture naming treatment for individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia, emphasizing the variability in treatment response and the importance of dose in optimizing aphasia recovery . These studies collectively underscore the significance of tailored interventions, peer support, and technology in enhancing psychosocial attitudes and communication outcomes for individuals with aphasia.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
3 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
1 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
03 May 2022 | Not addressed in the paper. |
6 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What are the potential benefits of using TMS in conjunction with traditional aphasia rehabilitation techniques?5 answersCombining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with traditional aphasia rehabilitation techniques shows promise in enhancing language recovery post-stroke. Studies have explored the effectiveness of various TMS methods, such as transcranial direct electric current stimulation (tDCS), anodal tDCS, intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), and neuronavigated repetitive TMS. Research indicates that TMS interventions can lead to improvements in naming accuracy, discourse skills, working memory, reasoning, narrative abilities, communication efficiency, and quality of life for patients with aphasia. Furthermore, low-frequency rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere has been found to be safe and effective in enhancing overall language function, expressive language, naming, repetition, writing, and comprehension in stroke patients with aphasia. These findings suggest that integrating TMS with traditional methods can offer comprehensive benefits in aphasia rehabilitation.
Does speech and occupational therapy help adults with aphasia?5 answersSpeech and occupational therapy have shown significant benefits for adults with aphasia. Conventional speech and language therapy have been effective in improving language and communication abilities in the chronic stage after stroke, although with a small effect size. Additionally, self-managed computerized speech and language therapy has been found to be beneficial for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke, leading to improved word finding abilities. Furthermore, behavioral therapy methods focusing on functional communication have shown significant improvements in phonological and lexical accuracy in aphasic patients, enhancing their communication skills. Evaluation tools used by professionals in neurological rehabilitation have highlighted the importance of addressing various aspects beyond communication, such as human occupation and psycho-affective aspects, emphasizing the need for comprehensive care for individuals with aphasia. Overall, speech and occupational therapy play a crucial role in enhancing language skills and overall quality of life for adults with aphasia.
How does the logogen model account for semantic paraphasia in individuals with aphasia?5 answersThe logogen model, which is a theoretical framework for language processing, may account for semantic paraphasia in individuals with aphasia by considering the impact of semantic similarity on word-finding deficits. This model suggests that semantic errors in naming tasks could stem from disruptions in the activation of word representations within the mental lexicon. Additionally, the logogen model could explain how phonological errors, such as phonemic paraphasias, may result from post-semantic deficits in language production. By incorporating insights from the logogen model, researchers aim to better understand and characterize the nature of word-finding difficulties in individuals with aphasia, ultimately contributing to the development of more accurate assessment tools like ParAlg.
Pharmacotherapy and psychological rehabilitation for aphasia?5 answersPharmacotherapy and psychological rehabilitation are both important in the treatment of aphasia. Pharmacotherapy involves the use of medications to target specific neurotransmitter systems and deficits in language domains. Drugs such as nootropic agents, donepezil, and memantine have shown promise in improving aphasia prognosis. Other drugs, such as those acting on the central cholinergic and glutamergic systems, have also been effective in improving clinical outcomes. Psychological rehabilitation, including speech and language therapy, is the standard treatment for aphasia. However, there is evidence to suggest that combining pharmacotherapy with speech and language therapy can enhance recovery from aphasic stroke. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of pharmacotherapy and psychological rehabilitation in the treatment of aphasia.
Which intervention types can be used to treat reading comprehension in aphasia?4 answersThere are several intervention types that can be used to treat reading comprehension in aphasia. One approach is strategy-based intervention, which focuses on improving text-level reading comprehension and reading activities. Thumbeck et al. conducted a study to analyze the efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia. Another approach is restorative treatment, which aims to improve auditory comprehension. Wallace et al. conducted a scoping review that categorized restorative treatments into direct auditory, mixed auditory, and indirect approaches. Lee et al. also mentioned that nonlinguistic deficits can contribute to reading comprehension problems in aphasia, suggesting that treatment should address these deficits as well. Additionally, Purnomo and Makiyah reviewed articles on reading-based therapy in aphasia and found that this intervention improved language skills, reading comprehension, and cognitive function.
Why is figurative language important to check in adult patients with aphasia?5 answersFigurative language is important to check in adult patients with aphasia because it can provide insights into their language comprehension abilities and potential impairments. Studies have shown that individuals with aphasia tend to have difficulty understanding and interpreting figurative expressions, such as idioms, metaphors, proverbs, and similes. They often exhibit a strong literal bias, interpreting these expressions in a literal rather than figurative manner. The type of figurative trope and the type of task can significantly affect the performance of individuals with aphasia, with overlearned sequences like proverbs and similes being easier to understand than idioms and metaphors. Difficulties in accessing figurative meanings and processing abstract words and concepts have been identified as potential mechanisms underlying the deficit in idiom comprehension seen in aphasia. Assessing figurative language skills in adult patients with aphasia can help in designing diagnostic tools and interventions to address their specific language impairments.