Dose fear appeal amplify right wing beliefs?
Best insight from top research papers
Fear appeal has been observed to influence voting behavior during elections . It is noted that fear appeals are commonly used in populist rhetoric, potentially reducing reliance on partisan habits . Research on fear appeals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic highlights that social media can amplify fear through imbalanced threat-efficacy messages, particularly in hard-hit countries like Brazil and Russia . A study on fear and privacy found that the perceived threat of terrorism can impact individuals' willingness to allow increased governmental surveillance, indicating a complex relationship between fear, privacy, and security concerns . Additionally, the appraisal of fear appeals by students prior to high-stakes tests can impact their engagement levels, suggesting a nuanced interplay between fear appeals and emotional responses .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
5 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Open access 01 Jan 2017 | Not addressed in the paper. |
1 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
10 Citations | Fear appeals in political communication, including right-wing rhetoric, can reduce partisan habits and increase receptiveness to new information, potentially amplifying right-wing beliefs. |
| Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
Why do candidates appeal to religious right?4 answersCandidates appeal to the religious right because religious cues and references can activate religious traditionalism among voters, influencing how candidates are considered. Religious discourses are used by candidates to emphasize their own closeness to God and Christianity, promote traditional morality, and portray competitors as immoral and corrupt. Candidates may also make campaign promises related to religious issues to establish the perception that they are honest and committed to those issues, which can influence voters' evaluations of them. The level of public support for a particular policy position also shapes how overtly candidates signal their views, with those supporting moral traditionalism or restrictions on religious minorities tending to express their views covertly. Overall, religious appeals can be effective in mobilizing and appealing to the religious right, especially in societies with a strong religious population or where evangelical groups are on the rise.
Why do legislators appeal to right-wing groups?5 answersLegislators appeal to right-wing groups because they can secure support from opposition voters and increase public support for their partisan legislation through bipartisan appeals, even if there is little actual bipartisan action ^[Westwood]. This strategy allows representatives to reconcile public expectations of bipartisan lawmaking with the lack of compromise in recent congresses ^[Westwood]. Bipartisan rhetoric has a significant influence on public opinion, shaping perceptions of ideological extremity and increasing support for partisan legislation ^[Westwood]. Additionally, the ideological composition of a legislature determines the use of intermediaries by interest groups, who may lobby allied legislators to help persuade unconvinced legislators ^[Awad]. Legislators' policy votes are influenced by personal, institutional, and political factors, with professionalism having a positive effect on policy responsiveness and district competition and legislative ambition having negative effects.
How bad is right wing US media propaganda?5 answersRight-wing US media propaganda has been a significant issue, with various papers highlighting its impact. Minick, Goldberg, and Knauer discuss a system for augmenting the effectiveness of an airfoil, which is unrelated to media propaganda. Culbert explores the historical meaning of the word "propaganda" and its association with the Roman Catholic Church. Yun and Kim focus on the serious threat posed by extremist propaganda activities in the cyber domain, particularly by right-wing extremist groups. Conason discusses the distortion of truth by the right-wing propaganda machine and its impact on public perception. Minnite analyzes the right-wing propaganda campaign to control the media narrative and frame social forces, particularly in the context of the 2010 midterm election. These papers collectively suggest that right-wing US media propaganda has had a significant influence on public opinion and political discourse.
Are right wing people more competitive?5 answersRight-wing individuals are more likely to prefer dominant leaders, which can be attributed to their perception of dominance as a sign of competence in conflict situations. However, this preference for dominant leaders is not solely based on perceived competence but also on perceived policy agreement. Right-wing individuals tend to view the world as dangerous and have heightened preferences for dominant leaders. There is no systematic difference between right-wing populists and non-populists in their support for welfare and gender equality. Right-wing parties may strengthen ties with conservative groups who oppose legislation on issues like abortion, LGBT rights, and gender equality. Overall, while right-wing individuals may have a preference for dominant leaders, the level of competitiveness among right-wing people is not explicitly addressed in the abstracts provided.
What is the relationship between right-wing parties and their voters?4 answersRight-wing parties have a complex relationship with their voters. Research shows that voters ascribe greater economic competence to right-wing parties, leading to enhanced economic issue ownership when voters perceive them shifting to the right. This perceived rightward shift of parties also leads to subsequent increases in electoral support, especially during recessions when voters prioritize parties' economic competence. However, the appeal of right-wing populist parties (RWPs) is asymmetric and affects citizens on the economical left and right differently. Strong pro-redistribution preferences drive voters away from RWPs, while political distrust outweighs the effect of pro-redistribution preferences in areas where RWPs are less established. Income inequality also plays a role in voter support for right-wing parties, with poor people more likely to vote for radical right-wing parties (RRPs) while rich people are discouraged from doing so. Social identity mediates the income inequality effect on voter support for RRPs. The success of right-wing populist parties is attributed to a combination of demand-side voter factors and supply-side factors, such as the role of the media. Cues related to immigration and anti-politics have effects on key attitudes driving right-wing populist support, indirectly affecting the probability of voting for such parties. Overall, the relationship between right-wing parties and their voters involves factors such as economic competence, redistribution preferences, income inequality, and the role of media and cues.
How does fear and ignorance affect racism?5 answersFear and ignorance play significant roles in perpetuating racism. The deliberate promotion of ignorance about racism by certain individuals and groups contributes to the maintenance of widespread ignorance about the existence and impact of racism in society. Additionally, the politics of fear, facilitated by governments, can lead to the revival of "new racisms" and the denial of racism as a contributing factor to incidents of violence and discrimination. In a sociopolitical context shaped by an "epistemology of ignorance," the configuration between knowledge and responsibility fosters irresponsibility, allowing whites to refuse responsibility for racial offenses. The technologies of the surveilling state further perpetuate this ignorance by selectively "seeing" certain truths about race while protecting certain blindnesses to white privilege. To address this, an alternative approach to responsibility is needed, one centered on the narratives of racial others and fostering democratic renegotiations of racial responsibility.