Search or ask a question

How do couples feel after an argument?

Social cognitive theory of morality

Moral disengagement

Moral obligation

Best insight from top research papers

Couples' post-argument feelings vary based on factors like jealousy, aggression, sexual desire, and conflict resolution strategies. Research shows that jealousy can lead to aggression, which in turn affects sexual desire and the likelihood of post-conflict intimacy . Additionally, after heightened quarreling, individuals with different attachment styles experience varying levels of negative affect, with low-avoidant individuals showing heightened negative affect and high-avoidant individuals reporting lower negative affect . Cultural differences also play a role, with emotions like anger and strength being central in Belgium for relational independence, while shame and empathy are crucial in Japan for relational interdependence . These emotional dynamics post-argument can impact relationship satisfaction and the overall well-being of couples, highlighting the complexity of post-conflict experiences.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Different bumps in the road: The emotional dynamics of couple disagreements in Belgium and Japan. Michael Boiger, Alexander Kirchner-Häusler, Anna Schouten, Yukiko Uchida, Batja Mesquita - Show less +4 more 28 Dec 2020-Emotion 5 Citations	Couples in Belgium tend to feel anger or strength after disagreements, while in Japan, they may experience empathy or shame, reflecting cultural ideals of independence and interdependence.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Different bumps in the road: The emotional dynamics of couple disagreements in Belgium and Japan. 01 Aug 2022-Emotion 4 Citations	Couples in Belgium tend to feel self-assertive emotions like anger, while those in Japan feel other-focused emotions like empathy after disagreements, reflecting cultural differences in emotional dynamics.
Journal Article•DOI Don't go to bed angry: Attachment, conflict, and affective and physiological reactivity Angela M. Hicks, Lisa M. Diamond - Show less +1 more 01 Jun 2011-Personal Relationships 47 Citations	After an argument, low-avoidant individuals experience heightened negative affect, while high-avoidant individuals report lower negative affect. Sleep disruptions increase, especially in high attachment anxiety individuals.
Journal Article•DOI Moral conflict and ordinary emotional experience Michael K. Morris 01 Apr 1992-Journal of Value Inquiry	Not addressed in the paper.
Open access•Dissertation Post-conflict situations, conciliatory acts and relationship satisfaction in intimate relationships Maria Kontogianni 01 Jan 2006 1 Citations	Couples feel a range of emotions after an argument, with post-conflict conciliatory acts like affection, sex, distancing, apology, and humor helping them return to normality and reach closure.

My columns

Related Questions

What are the specific emotions that individuals experience after watching Instagram reels?4 answersIndividuals experience a range of emotions after watching Instagram Reels. Negative emotions such as appearance comparison and envy are commonly reported during the use of social network services like Instagram. These negative experiences can have an impact on individuals' well-being, leading to phenomena like "Facebook depression". However, Instagram Reels also have the potential to evoke positive emotions and joyful experiences. Users, particularly students, have shown enthusiasm and happiness when participating in learning activities designed with the use of Instagram Reels. Additionally, Instagram Reels can elicit positive emotions such as interest and engagement, which can contribute to building awareness and attracting the attention of users. Overall, the emotions experienced after watching Instagram Reels can vary from negative to positive, depending on the individual and the content being viewed.

What are the typical challenges that couples face after marriage?4 answersCouples face various challenges after marriage, including racism and discrimination, financial strain and work stress, acculturation, negative historical or societal influences, and legal challenges. These challenges can impact the well-being of couples from different ethnic backgrounds, as well as same-sex couples. Additionally, support from family or friends and religiosity and spirituality can be important areas of strength for couples to enhance with the help of therapists.

Why does a break up with a loved one hurt?5 answersA break up with a loved one can hurt because emotional stress can elicit similar responses to physical pain in the brain and body. The experience of a painful breakup is often described as a form of pain, even though it may not involve a physical stimulus. The brain and body process emotional stress and physical pain in similar ways, leading to similar physiological and psychological reactions. Understanding the similarities and differences in how the brain and body respond to emotional stress and physical pain can help explain why breakups can be so painful. Additionally, coping mechanisms may be revealed on a mental health level, providing insights into how individuals can navigate the pain of a breakup.

How does someone feel emotions while seeing an artwork?5 answersEmotions are felt while seeing an artwork through a combination of factors. The bodily sensations triggered by art play a central role in evoking emotions, especially when human figures are prominent in the artwork. Artists and makers have intentions to convey or evoke specific emotions through their works, and viewers experience emotional responses when engaging with the artwork. Aesthetic emotions, which are emotions underlying the evaluative assessment of artworks, contribute to the overall emotional experience of art. These emotions are not solely mental events or expressions of the audience's needs but are part of the creative truth of the artwork. Computational models have been developed to understand the emotions evoked by art, using both visual and textual modalities.

Why do some people feel angry all the time?5 answersFeeling angry about their health status may influence disease progression in individuals, creating a greater burden on the health care system. Identifying associations between different variables and feeling angry about health status may assist health professionals to improve health outcomes. Overall, 18.5% of the population reported feeling angry about their health "some of the time", "most of the time" or "all of the time". People who felt angry about their health were more likely to have a severe health condition, at least one chronic condition, high psychological distress, fair to poor health status, and needed to adjust their daily lives because of a health condition. Having a tertiary level education was protective. Receiving some form of social support, usually from a support group, and not always doing as advised by a doctor, were also associated with a higher likelihood of being angry about their health.

Can you feel apoptosis?10 answers

See what other people are reading

What are some Motivations Behind Cyber Stalking?

Cyberstalking motivations vary, including affection, rejection, obsession, retaliation, revenge, and the desire for intimacy development. Victims often perceive stalkers as motivated by affection, rejection, or obsession. Personality traits like online disinhibition, moral disengagement, narcissism, and aggression play a role in cyberbullying perpetration motives such as entertainment, revenge, harm, and dominance. Cyberbullying motives in Pakistan include social relationships, power imbalance, and anonymity. Stalking, including cyberstalking, can stem from a need for control and intimacy development, with some individuals engaging in both bullying and being bullied. Delusional beliefs, such as erotomanic delusions, can also drive cyberstalking behaviors.What marital status of fisherfolk that most comply illegal fishing activities?

Married fisherfolk owning fish processing assets, particularly those with multiple wives, tend to engage in illegal fishing activities, contributing to environmental issues like deforestation and climate change. In fishing households, wives are involved in various resource management activities, except fishing, while husbands focus on public roles, perpetuating gender stratification and male domination. Additionally, in fishing communities along Lake Victoria, married couples exhibit a high prevalence of sexual concurrency, leading to the formation of sexual networks and potential HIV risks, with interventions suggested to address this issue. The study on French fishers' wives highlights the diverse contributions of women to fisheries, including administrative tasks and gear maintenance, with some opting for legal recognition through collaborative spouse status.What are primary sources for the history of motivation?

Primary sources for the history of motivation encompass various philosophical and scientific perspectives. The concept of motivation has evolved from mystical interpretations to more sophisticated cognitive formulations, including drive theory and unconscious motivations. Philosophical insights from Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, and later Aristotelian accounts provide foundational perspectives on moral motivation. Additionally, the psychology of motivation has advanced by considering the interplay of motivation with cognition, affect, habits, and goals, leading to a deeper understanding of human behavior and willpower. Historical analyses of motivation in education have also highlighted shifts from drive concepts to cognitive concerns and individual differences, shaping current and future trends in motivational research.What are the ethical values of dutch people?

Dutch ethical values reflect a progressive consensus, as evidenced by increasing permissiveness towards various social issues like euthanasia, abortion, and homosexuality. Despite the perception of Dutch society being preoccupied with death and patient autonomy, Dutch physicians hold significant influence in treatment decisions, showcasing a paternalistic approach. This dynamic raises questions about the balance between professional responsibility and patient autonomy in medical ethics. Moreover, the Netherlands serves as a cross-cultural setting where bioethicists struggle due to the lack of theoretical resources, highlighting the complexity of moral norms in a diverse society. In times of crisis, such as dramatic budget cuts in the performing arts sector, Dutch artists have demonstrated resistance and re-appropriation of their rights, showcasing a counter-hegemonic response within the society.Are attachment anxiety or attachment avoidance related to problems in the reorganization of attachment figure hierarchies?

Attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance are indeed related to problems in the reorganization of attachment figure hierarchies. Research suggests that attachment anxiety is correlated with difficulties in attention-related tasks, maladaptive deactivating coping strategies, increased alcohol consumption, and drinking-related problems. On the other hand, attachment avoidance is linked to maladaptive deactivating coping strategies and greater alcohol consumption. Additionally, individual differences in attachment anxiety and avoidance influence normative attachment reorganization processes following relationship transitions, impacting narrative coherence and self-concept clarity. Furthermore, attachment-related anxiety is associated with genital satisfaction, which in turn affects sexual experiences, including diminished sexual arousal, desire, and pain during sexual activity. These findings highlight the significant role of attachment styles in shaping various aspects of individuals' lives, including emotional regulation, coping strategies, and social functioning.Is there a relationship between IQ and moral goodness?

There is a relationship between IQ and moral goodness. Higher national average intelligence is associated with more liberal attitudes towards moral issues like euthanasia and suicide, influenced by religiousness. Additionally, individuals with intellectual disabilities reasoning at lower moral stages may be less likely to engage in illegal behavior, while those with borderline intelligence may be more prone to it. Moreover, Emotional Intelligence (EI) plays a role in Moral Reasoning (MR), with EI significantly predicting personality dimensions that, in turn, predict moral reasoning. Furthermore, there is a negative correlation between moral intelligence and academic entitlement, with moral intelligence positively correlating with academic performance. These findings collectively suggest that IQ, emotional intelligence, and moral reasoning are intertwined in shaping moral values and behaviors.What is the definition of the Moral numbness?

Moral numbness, also known as ethical numbness or moral indifference, refers to a state where individuals exhibit a lack of sensitivity or awareness towards moral responsibilities and ethical considerations. This phenomenon can arise due to various factors such as the complex division of labor, desensitization in modern organizations, and excessive exposure to distressing content in the media. It can also manifest in clinical settings, where analysts may become preoccupied with the patient's reality, leading to a numbing of awareness towards the psychic reality of the transference. Additionally, moral dumbfounding, characterized by maintaining moral judgments without supporting reasons, is another aspect related to moral numbness that has been widely discussed in moral psychology research. Overall, moral numbness represents a concerning state of apathy towards ethical considerations that can have detrimental effects on individuals and society.Does moral grammar better capture the complexities of moral reasoning compared to dual process theory?

Moral grammar, as proposed in Chomsky's framework, aims to address the fundamental aspects of moral knowledge acquisition and utilization. In contrast, dual process theory suggests that moral intuitions are automatically elicited, with subsequent reasoning correcting these initial intuitions. While moral grammar emphasizes the structure and acquisition of moral knowledge, dual process theory focuses on the dynamic and distributed nature of moral cognition, influenced by social context and real-life judgments. The debate between moral grammar and dual process theory highlights differing perspectives on moral reasoning processes. While moral grammar may provide a structured framework for understanding moral knowledge, dual process theory emphasizes the dynamic and context-dependent nature of moral cognition, suggesting a need for a shift towards more dynamic system models of moral reasoning.Why instinct important in decision making of clinical instructors?

Instinct plays a crucial role in the decision-making of clinical instructors due to its connection to intuitive decision-making processes, as highlighted in. Experienced doctors often rely on gut instinct, which aligns with System 1 processes in cognitive models, indicating its significance in clinical practice. Moreover, the concept of moral intuition, when conflicting with normative ethical theories, suggests a need to consider instinctual responses in complex real-life clinical situations, as discussed in. Additionally, the continuous honing of instincts based on previous experiences, as proposed by modern neuroscientists in, further emphasizes the importance of instinct in guiding clinical decisions. Therefore, integrating instinctual responses alongside formal training and education can enhance decision-making processes for clinical instructors in navigating challenging scenarios effectively.How to distinguish animals and human?

The distinction between animals and humans has been a subject of philosophical and ethical debate. Historically, humans have attempted to differentiate themselves from animals based on attributes like reason, language, and morality. However, the concept of human exceptionalism, where humans are considered inherently superior to animals, has been challenged in the modern era. Critics argue that criteria such as language use or ethical capacities, traditionally used to separate humans from animals, are not exclusive to humans and can be found in some non-human species as well. This challenges the notion of "speciesism," which grants special moral privileges to humans based solely on their species. The evolving understanding of the human-animal distinction emphasizes the need to reevaluate traditional boundaries and consider moral considerations beyond species membership.Is there a dark side of gratitude?

Gratitude, typically viewed positively, also has a dark side. Research highlights various aspects of this darker side. Firstly, expressing thanks to high-power group members who transgress and then help can pacify low-power group members, discouraging protest and masking power differences. Additionally, gratitude in relationships can lead to prosocial rule-breaking in supervisor-subordinate dynamics, influenced by relationship-based gratitude and moral disengagement. Furthermore, the effectiveness of gratitude communications in workplaces is explored, emphasizing the importance of sincerity and specific, personalized expressions of appreciation. Gratitude can turn intrinsically bad when directed towards inappropriate objects or when the response intensity is disproportionate to the act. These findings collectively shed light on the nuanced and potentially negative implications of gratitude.