How do i write a project on Ceo attribute and sustainability reporting?
Best insight from top research papers
To write a project on CEO attributes and sustainability reporting, you can start by exploring the influence of CEO attributes on strategic choices such as the adoption of sustainability reporting practices. Research has shown that CEO attributes such as education, background, career track, and international exposure influence the strategic choices of organizations, including the adoption of sustainability reporting practices . Additionally, it is important to examine the impact of CEO attributes on sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting. CEOs with research background, financial expertise, and foreign exposure tend to engage more in activities that improve sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting . Furthermore, it is crucial to consider the relationship between the managerial agency problem and sustainability reporting. The managerial agency problem leads to less sustainability information reported by a firm, highlighting the benefits of sustainability reporting as an effective corporate governance instrument to mitigate the managerial agency problem . By considering these aspects, your project can provide valuable insights into the role of CEO attributes in shaping sustainability reporting practices.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The paper examines the relationship between CEO attributes (such as CEO salary and bonuses) and sustainability reporting. It finds a negative association between the CEO agency problem and sustainability reporting. | |
06 Nov 2019 | The provided paper does not discuss writing a project on CEO attributes and sustainability reporting. |
15 Citations | The provided paper discusses CEO attributes and their impact on corporate sustainability, but it does not specifically address sustainability reporting. |
2 Citations | The paper provides insights on the impact of CEO attributes on sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting in Chinese listed firms. It suggests that CEOs with research background, financial expertise, and foreign exposure tend to engage more in activities that improve sustainability and environmental reporting. However, young CEOs tend to take actions that reduce both sustainable and environmental performance. |
30 Jun 2023 | The paper explores how the observable attributes and cognitive traits of the top management team, including the CEO, influence the adoption of sustainability reporting practices in organizations. It provides insights into how CEO characteristics shape sustainability reporting practices in Bangladesh. |
Related Questions
How sustainability reporting affects small and medium enterprises?5 answersSustainability reporting significantly impacts small and medium enterprises (SMEs) by influencing their practices, motivations, and communication strategies. Studies emphasize the importance of sustainability reporting for SMEs, as they play a crucial role in the economy and are essential for global sustainability challenges. Research indicates that the size of SMEs affects the length and content of sustainability reports, with larger SMEs tending to have more extensive reports. Moreover, the business case for sustainability reporting in SMEs is perceived differently by consultants and academics, with varying priorities on costs and benefits, which can influence non-reporting SMEs to engage in sustainability practices. Overall, sustainability reporting is becoming increasingly imperative for SMEs to ensure transparency, comparability, and alignment with global sustainability goals.
Why do corporate sustainability reporting important?5 answersCorporate sustainability reporting is crucial due to the increasing recognition of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as almost obligatory, emphasizing the need for transparency and credibility. Sustainability reporting enhances financial reporting quality, meeting diverse corporate information user needs and addressing deficiencies in traditional financial reporting. A legal framework is essential for explaining Corporate Sustainability Reporting practices, highlighting the importance of sustainability drivers for market opportunities and green business operations. Additionally, the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into corporate performance is gaining traction, necessitating a better understanding of ESG databases for informed decision-making. European sustainability reporting studies underscore the need for a comprehensive discussion on key features in the European setting, emphasizing the importance of differentiating between stakeholder- and shareholder-oriented countries for a holistic view on sustainability beyond financial performance.
What is sustainability report?4 answersA sustainability report is a form of reporting that reflects a company's responsibility for its operational activities related to the environment and natural surroundings. It is a report submitted to the company's stakeholders to report the impact of the company's activities on the environment, social, and economy. Sustainability reporting is measuring, disclosing, and being accountable to internal and external stakeholders for organizational performance toward sustainable development. The report conveys information related to the sustainable development goals agreed upon by nations for the safety of humans and the environment. It explains the economic, environmental, and social impacts resulting from the company's operating activities, as well as corporate culture, governance, and commitment to maintaining the sustainability of the triple bottom line (people, planet, profit).
What are the most important sustainability reporting standards?5 answersThe most important sustainability reporting standard is the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework, which is widely used globally. The GRI has evolved over the years, with versions such as G3/G3.1, G4, and the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards introduced in 2016. It provides guidelines for measuring, disclosing, and comparing sustainability information in a detailed and structured manner. However, there is a rising demand for global convergence of sustainability reporting standards, and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation has proposed the development of a global set of standards focused on the financial impacts of sustainability issues. Despite this, companies are likely to continue using the current frameworks, including GRI, to report on sustainability beyond financial impacts. External assurance of sustainability reporting is also becoming increasingly important, with internationally recognized standards such as ISAE 3000 and AA1000AS being used for assurance.
How does sustainability reporting affect investors?4 answersSustainability reporting influences investors' investment decisions, but the credibility of these disclosures is often questioned. Investors perceive sustainability reporting as important and include it in their decision-making process. Experimental research on sustainability reporting perception has increased in recent years, with studies focusing on factors such as sustainability performance and external assurance. However, other factors like disclosure precision and inherent plausibility are less explored. Future research should investigate these understudied credibility factors and consider diverse experimental settings. Additionally, the European Union's taxonomy regulation introduces a standardized sustainability metric that affects investment probability more than sustainability ratings when the two metrics disagree. When they agree, a strong rating has an incremental effect on investment probability. This suggests that a mandatory standardized sustainability metric complements sustainability ratings in channeling investment.
What are effects of CEO attributes and corporate sustainability performance?5 answersCEO attributes have significant effects on corporate sustainability performance. CEO remuneration and tenure are positively associated with corporate reputation and financial performance. Female CEOs and CEO remuneration also have a positive association with financial performance. CEO busyness, on the other hand, has a negative relationship with corporate reputation and financial performance. CEO age is negatively associated with sustainable growth, while tenure has a positive association with sustainable growth. CEO education and tenure act as positive moderators in the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance. CEO overconfidence has a positive effect on sustainability performance, while CEO hubris has a negative effect. CEO narcissism and hubris can moderate the effect of corporate sustainability practices on firm performance, with hubristic CEOs enhancing the positive influence of sustainability practices. CEO influence on sustainability reporting can affect the relationship between sustainability performance and cost of equity, with a strong influence leading to increased cost of equity.