How do legislatures use legislative brinksmanship?
Best insight from top research papers
Legislatures utilize legislative brinksmanship by engaging in strategic maneuvers to push their agenda and negotiate with other entities. This tactic involves creating tension and leveraging uncertainty to achieve favorable outcomes. The politics of constitutional brinksmanship between Congress and states highlight the ongoing struggle between state and federal rights . Brinkmanship crises are modeled as games of sequential bargaining, where states' resolve, misperception, and the status quo influence escalation and crisis stability . Additionally, legislative organizations strategically structure arrangements with informational committees to influence policy outcomes, emphasizing the importance of specialization and incentives for committee work . By employing brinksmanship strategies, legislatures aim to assert their influence, navigate uncertainties, and shape legislative processes to their advantage.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
Open access 14 Feb 2012 | Not addressed in the paper. |
Open access•Book 08 Dec 1988 21 Citations | Legislatures use constitutional brinksmanship by engaging in state drives for a constitutional convention every twenty years, showcasing the tension between state and federal rights for constitutional reform. |
| Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What is the definition of legislative strengthening?4 answersLegislative strengthening refers to efforts aimed at enhancing the capacity, effectiveness, and performance of legislative bodies within a political system. This includes initiatives to improve the legislative branch's ability to make laws, hold the executive branch accountable, and represent citizen interests. International organizations have been involved in activities to strengthen legislative capacity, but there is a lack of consensus on the most effective approach. Various strategies have been implemented, such as training programs for legislators, providing resources like computers and buildings, and altering incentives for public officials to drive successful legislative reform in developing and transition economies. The ultimate goal of legislative strengthening is to promote good governance, economic growth, development, and democracy.
Why do women legislators experience clientelism?5 answersWomen legislators experience clientelism due to the challenging institutional environment they face, which leads them to form denser professional networks as a compensatory strategy. This networking allows female representatives to have more profuse and diverse legislative relationships, which in turn can result in higher vote shares during elections. Additionally, the long heritage of social conservatism and traditionalism in certain regions, such as Oklahoma, creates performance pressures for women in legislative politics, leading to tokenism and limited success. The experiences of social and political marginalization, particularly for women of color, shape their political behavior and prioritization of women's issues, making them more responsive to advocacy groups and inclusive in state-level policymaking.
How do electoral systems affect legislators’ representation of constituents?5 answersElectoral systems have an impact on legislators' representation of constituents. The spatial distribution of MPs' birthplaces is influenced by electoral rules, with mixed-member systems performing better in terms of spatial representativeness compared to single-member district and multi-member district systems. Legislators' electoral incentives, shaped by electoral systems, can influence their behavior and the organization of the legislature itself. The quality of political representation is indirectly affected by electoral systems, although the evidence is marginal and further research is needed. The vulnerability of legislators to electoral defeat mediates the effect of electoral institutions on their constituency effort, with different effects observed in party-centered and candidate-centered systems. Electoral procedures, such as those in multi-member districts, can influence legislative agendas, outcomes, and productivity, with shared constituencies potentially influencing the balance of power within the legislature.
Does legislative oversight affect government accountability?4 answersLegislative oversight plays a crucial role in ensuring government accountability. It allows for the investigation of potential wrongdoing by the executive branch and holds the executive accountable for their actions. Effective legislative oversight can lead to increased transparency, responsiveness, and reduced corruption in government. However, the effectiveness of legislative oversight in ensuring government accountability can vary depending on factors such as the political climate, the sincerity of the oversight actors, and the enforcement capacity of oversight mechanisms. In South Africa, for example, poor performance, maladministration, and a lack of accountability in government institutions have posed challenges to the implementation of legislative oversight. Similarly, in Nigeria and South Africa, the dispersion of powers among institutions of government, as provided for in their constitutions, has contributed to the accountability of the executive to the legislature. Overall, legislative oversight is a critical tool in promoting government accountability, but its effectiveness depends on various contextual factors.
What are the different types of legislative systems?5 answersLegislative systems can vary across different countries and regions. In Europe, the European Parliaments, including the British Parliament, and the U.S Congress are compared in terms of their relationship to government, their capacity to constrain government, the legal measures that can be taken upon the executive, and the role of political parties in shaping their major features. The emergence of new democracies in Central and Eastern Europe provides an opportunity to study the transition of legislatures from non-democratic to democratic regimes, focusing on the electoral process, party systems, and the distribution of power between the executive and the legislature. In the United States, various methods of government are explored, including approaches that involve returning voting power to constituents and establishing direct voter branches within the U.S. Congress. In Asia, legislatures come in different forms, ranging from liberal democracies to autocracies, with diverse regime types impacting government performance and legitimacy. Different types of legislative organization are characterized based on their partisan or nonpartisan nature of agenda formation and the openness or closedness of the amendment process, with variations in ideal-point measures and biases in estimation.
What are the different punctuation marks used in legislative drafting?5 answersLegislative drafting uses a range of punctuation marks to ensure clarity and precision in the language of the law. These punctuation marks serve various purposes, such as indicating the structure and organization of the legislative text, separating different elements within a sentence, and clarifying the meaning of specific terms or expressions. Some common punctuation marks used in legislative drafting include commas, semicolons, colons, parentheses, quotation marks, and dashes. These marks help to create a logical flow of information, highlight important details, and provide clarity to the readers of the legislation.