Search or ask a question

How does Ann Wilcocks framework potentially oversimplifying or overlooking important nuances.?

Shortest path problem

Statistical power

Sample size determination

Best insight from top research papers

Ann Wilcocks' framework may oversimplify or overlook important nuances by failing to consider various factors. For instance, the framework developed by Lemyre et al. for shared decision-making in extremely premature births lacks a comprehensive analysis of comorbidities like deafness and blindness, which necessitates a deeper bioethical examination . Additionally, the framework may not adequately address the need for concrete examples to describe morbidity, leaving interpretations ambiguous . Furthermore, the absence of a balanced representation of parental perspectives, with all parents having initial experiences with intensive care, could skew the framework towards certain preferences . The framework's effectiveness and reliability in real-world implementation, including training protocols for healthcare providers and feedback mechanisms from families, are also crucial aspects that may be overlooked .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI ANN Based Framework for Energy Efficient Routing In Multi-Hop WSNs Rajan Sharma 20 Jun 2017-International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 3 Citations	The ANN-based framework may oversimplify by focusing on energy-efficient routing, potentially overlooking other critical factors like network topology or security concerns in multi-hop WSNs.
Journal Article•DOI Response to "Frameworks are pretty on paper but often don't fit reality". Brigitte Lemyre 01 Dec 2016-Journal of Perinatology	The framework may oversimplify by lacking in-depth analysis of comorbidities, ambiguity in defining NDD severity, and potential bias towards intensive care over palliative care decision-making.
Journal Article•DOI Frameworks are pretty on paper but often do not fit reality: Reply to Lemyre et al. K Schibli, A D'Angiulli - Show less +1 more 01 Dec 2016-Journal of Perinatology 1 Citations	Ann Wilcocks' framework may oversimplify by not addressing individual factors like birth weight, gender, or congenital anomalies, potentially overlooking crucial nuances in decision-making for extremely premature births.
Open access•Posted Content•DOI The Miss of the Framework Paul E. Smaldino 04 Apr 2023	The framework by Ann Wilcocks may oversimplify by lacking integration with existing theoretical frameworks, potentially overlooking crucial nuances in social and cognitive sciences.
Journal Article•DOI Sweeping recommendations regarding effect size and sample size can miss important nuances: A comment on “A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals” M. T. Bradley, Andrew Brand - Show less +1 more 01 Dec 2013-Theory & Psychology 6 Citations	Ann Wilcocks' framework may oversimplify by not considering the magnitude of negative correlations between sample size and effect size, missing nuances crucial for accurate effect size estimates.

My columns

Related Questions

Why does frameworks fail?4 answersFrameworks can fail for several reasons. One reason is the lack of a unifying theoretical framework, which can lead to incommensurability between social and cognitive theories. Another reason is the complexity of understanding and learning a framework, which can result in a steep learning curve for users. Additionally, the semantics of views in architecture frameworks can be open to interpretation, requiring architects to fill in the gaps. The involvement of multiple stakeholders and the need for proper tool support can also contribute to the failure of architecture frameworks. These challenges highlight the importance of integrating theoretical frameworks, providing clear documentation and support for users, and addressing semantic issues and collaboration in the development and maintenance of frameworks.

Why Willis and Ellis' TBLT framework is different? What are the main differences?5 answersWillis and Ellis' TBLT framework is different because it focuses on enhancing vocabulary retention through vocabulary quizzes administered on a Learning Management System platform. On the other hand, the framework developed by Long is a Task Based Needs Analysis (NA) model that aims to contribute to task and syllabus design in Task Based Language Teaching (TBLT). The main difference lies in the objectives of the frameworks. Willis and Ellis' framework aims to improve vocabulary retention, while Long's framework focuses on task and syllabus design.

What are the consequences of the lack of theoretical frameworks in research?5 answersThe lack of theoretical frameworks in research has several consequences. Firstly, it hinders researchers from entering broader academic conversations within and outside of their field, limiting opportunities for linking to other studies and hindering the understanding of foundational issues and problems. Secondly, it limits the ability to interpret and analyze research findings, as theoretical frameworks provide a lens through which questions can be examined and results can be interpreted. Additionally, the lack of theoretical engagement can result in a narrow understanding of a phenomenon, as theories pluralize our understanding and provide different perspectives. Furthermore, it can lead to a lack of diversity in research focus and findings, as certain theories may be overrepresented while others are underutilized. Overall, the lack of theoretical frameworks in research can impede the advancement of knowledge and limit the depth and breadth of understanding in a given field.

What are the limitations of the framework in the context of this paper?3 answersThe limitations of the framework in the context of this paper include the neglect of data-driven estimation for vital production parameters, exclusive generation of point forecasts without considering model uncertainty, and lacking explanations regarding the sources of such uncertainty. Additionally, the framework relies heavily on laws in source countries where timber is harvested, which may create corruption risks and weaken source country legal frameworks. The framework also needs revisions to clarify its contribution, articulate the approach to developing the framework, and differentiate it from similar works. Furthermore, existing classification systems have limitations in terms of Western bias, potential misuse, reliability, validity, comorbidity, and heterogeneity within diagnostic categories. Finally, the framework needs to go beyond the limitations inherent in classification systems to provide more relevant diagnoses and effective treatments.

Can you explain framework analysis please?5 answersFramework analysis is a systematic qualitative method used for analyzing qualitative data in applied policy research. It involves five steps: data familiarization, framework identification, indexing, charting, and mapping and interpretation. The method employs an organized structure of inductively- and deductively-derived themes to conduct cross-sectional analysis. The objective of framework analysis is to identify, describe, and interpret key patterns within and across cases and themes. It is a flexible and powerful method that can be applied to various types of data in applied research. Framework analysis is valuable for applied research due to its ability to provide a comparative analysis and consider multiple units of analysis.

What are the consequences of oversimplification of psychological terminologies?5 answersThe oversimplification of psychological terminologies can have serious consequences. It can lead to the misuse of concepts and methods in psychology, perpetuating misconceptions about difference and cultural diversity within the field. This can result in the underappreciation and lack of understanding of contributions from individuals and groups who differ from the male, Eurocentric norms. Additionally, oversimplification can hinder the application of complex statistical models in psychological research, limiting the ability to apply research in a confirmatory manner. This conflict arises from the adherence to simplistic labels of exploratory and confirmatory research, which masks the distinction between research practices and modeling. To address this, it is suggested that psychology replace these terms with more detailed descriptions of study goals, modeling details, and scientific methods.

See what other people are reading

How does PLS (Partial Least Squares) regression analysis improve the accuracy of SEM campaigns?

Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression analysis enhances the accuracy of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) campaigns by offering a robust alternative to traditional linear models, especially when dealing with datasets containing numerous variables. PLS-SEM methodology provides several optimal properties, including bias reduction, consistency, and enhanced R2 maximization, contributing to improved model reliability and validation. Additionally, PLS-SEM allows for the use of smaller sample sizes without compromising statistical power, ensuring that the acquired sample size is adequate to avoid false results. By incorporating innovative model evaluation metrics like ρA, HTMT, and PLSpredict procedure, researchers can assess internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity, and out-of-sample predictive power more effectively, thereby enhancing the rigor and accuracy of SEM campaigns.What are the advantages and disadvantages of using stratified sampling in research studies?

Stratified sampling in research studies offers advantages such as increased chances of replicability and generalizability, addressing healthy volunteer effects and inequity in health research studies, and providing a robust approach for dealing with uncertain input models in stochastic simulations. However, there are also disadvantages to consider. For instance, the need for careful consideration of strata-wise failure probabilities and the challenge of selecting generalized stratification variables^[Context_4. Additionally, the iterative process involved in defining outcomes and predictors may lead to increased Type I error rates, potentially affecting replicability. Despite these drawbacks, when implemented effectively, stratified sampling can significantly enhance the quality and reliability of research outcomes.What are the specific ethical issues related to social media use in Saudi Arabia?

Ethical issues related to social media use in Saudi Arabia encompass various aspects. Firstly, the impact of social networking platforms like Snapchat on moral values among Saudi youth is a concern, with issues such as religious and moral transgressions being highlighted. Secondly, the proliferation of content containing hate speech, insults, and blasphemy on social media leads to societal polarization and ethical dilemmas, necessitating the formulation of ethical guidelines aligned with Maqashid Syariah principles. Additionally, the ethical dimensions of seeking truth, minimizing harm, and being accountable in news coverage influence Saudi journalists' perceptions towards mobile journalism, emphasizing the importance of ethical codes in media practices. Moreover, the use of social media by plastic surgeons in Saudi Arabia raises questions about its impact on professional practices and patient decisions, indicating varying views on its role within the field.What are the standardized tests used to identify high-ability students?

Standardized tests commonly used to identify high-ability students include the Test of Colored Progressive Matrices of Raven, Academic Performance Test (TDE), norm-referenced standardized tests of intelligence and achievement, and various tests of intellectual ability encompassing fluid and crystallized intelligence. These assessments help in pinpointing students with exceptional abilities in areas such as abstract thinking, scientific-mathematical talent, verbal talent, and creativity. The use of multiple tests is recommended to create a comprehensive evaluation process that can efficiently distinguish high-ability students. Educators rely on these standardized assessments to gather quantitative data for making informed decisions about students' academic potential and needs, ensuring equitable access to gifted and talented services.How ability of shs to handle/ faced negative comments?

The ability of social media managers to handle and address negative comments is crucial for organizations. Negative comments on social media can significantly impact an organization's reputation and success, making it essential to have effective strategies in place for managing such feedback. Research suggests that organizations should actively monitor reviews daily, respond promptly to negative comments, and foster a positive social media environment by engaging with followers. Additionally, utilizing sentiment classification techniques like Support Vector Machine (SVM) can help identify negative comments efficiently, enabling timely responses and improvements in products or services. Understanding the psychology behind negativity bias and user motivations can further aid in developing emotional intelligence to effectively address negative feedback.What is hypothesis in statistics?

In statistics, a hypothesis is a tentative answer or educated guess to a research question, forming a crucial part of hypothesis testing processes. Hypotheses are developed based on sample data collected to evaluate statistical significance. There are two main types of hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis assumes no difference between populations, while the alternative hypothesis suggests the presence of an effect or difference. Hypothesis testing involves statistical analysis to determine the likelihood of the null hypothesis being true based on the observed data, with the aim of either accepting or rejecting it. This process aids in making informed decisions and drawing statistical inferences in various fields, including medicine and research.What is the minimum number for sample?

The minimum sample size required for various types of studies varies based on different criteria. For factor analysis, the minimum sample size appears to be smaller for higher levels of communality and higher ratios of variables to factors. In the development of prediction models for continuous outcomes, a suitable sample size should ensure small optimism in predictor effect estimates, minimal difference in apparent and adjusted R2, and precise estimation of the model's residual standard deviation and mean predicted outcome value. When determining sample size conventionally, methods like the n-hat method and multistage nonfinite population method suggest a minimum sample size of around 30. In specific studies like estimating mean and variance in sugarcane populations, the minimum sample size is defined by the precision needed for the estimates. Lastly, for prediction models with binary or time-to-event outcomes, the minimum sample size should ensure small optimism in predictor effects, minimal difference in apparent and adjusted Nagelkerke's R2, and precise estimation of overall risk in the population.In what fields or disciplines is descriptive research commonly used, and what are some potential applications of this methodology?

Descriptive research is commonly utilized in various fields such as healthcare, nursing, education, and epidemiology. This methodology serves multiple purposes, including providing a comprehensive understanding of sample characteristics, aiding in clinical decision-making, determining appropriate sample sizes for future studies, and offering context and explanation for causal findings. In healthcare and nursing, descriptive research designs are valued for their simplicity and flexibility, allowing for in-depth exploration of diverse healthcare contexts. Moreover, in epidemiology, descriptive analyses are crucial for examining exposures, such as environmental chemicals, to inform risk assessment and identify vulnerable population subgroups. Overall, descriptive research plays a fundamental role in building a foundation for further experimental and quasi-experimental research across various disciplines.Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary

The intersection of change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary endeavors is a complex and evolving landscape. Theories of practice challenge traditional notions of agency and continuity, emphasizing habit, materiality, and contingency. Meanwhile, the convergence of literary criticism and theory has enriched literary creation, fostering a deeper understanding of how theory generates criticism and influences reading practices. Additionally, pragmatic linguistics and discourse analysis have highlighted the persuasive effects of rhetoric and its role in structuring culture, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between intention, convention, and performance. Despite claims of the demise of literary theory in the post-theory age, the theoretical paradigms for reading literary texts continue to shape interpretive structures and resist simplistic meanings, reflecting a persistent engagement with the complexities of literary texts and their broader implications.What is a statistically high power for a study?

A statistically high power for a study is typically considered to be 0.8, indicating an 80% chance of detecting a true difference if one exists. Statistical power is crucial in research as it determines the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis, ensuring reliable results and efficient resource utilization. Low statistical power can lead to Type II errors, where a true treatment effect goes undetected due to insufficient power, emphasizing the importance of adequate power in study design. To enhance power, strategies such as increasing sample sizes, selecting less stringent Type I error rates, and including relevant covariates are recommended, ultimately leading to more precise hypotheses and less susceptibility to erroneous conclusions, especially with small effect sizes.What is limerence according to psychological literature?

Limerence, as defined in psychological literature, refers to an acute and obsessive attachment to a specific individual, known as the Limerent Object. This phenomenon involves intense feelings of love or falling in love, often leading to ruminative thinking, anxiety, and depression. It is characterized by a journey towards greater authenticity and a realization of both real and idealized aspects of the Limerent Object, potentially linked to attachment anxieties. The concept of limerence is seen as a precious gift, akin to being in love, and can be compared to a passion for language that can be nurtured in individuals, especially children, to encourage creativity and abstract thinking. The study of limerence and its psychological implications is part of the broader field of psychoanalysis in literature, which aims to understand the impact of psychological aspects on creative expression and human behavior.