How does the discrimination index help identify and address disparities in education?
Best insight from top research papers
The discrimination index (DI) is a useful tool for identifying and addressing disparities in education. DI is a non-parametric measure that assesses the item discrimination power (IDP) in educational settings . It can reach values of +1 and -1, making it a robust indicator of discrimination. By analyzing students' responses to multiple-choice questions (MCQs), DI helps assess their understanding and the quality of assessment questions . DI is particularly valuable in validating exams, as it can identify errors in scoring, flawed questions, and the validity of challenging questions . Additionally, DI can be used to measure discrimination in educational contexts, such as in India, where it was found that lower caste students received lower scores compared to higher caste students . This highlights the importance of using DI to identify and address disparities in education, ensuring fair and equitable outcomes for all students.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access•Posted Content | The paper does not mention a discrimination index or how it helps identify and address disparities in education. The paper focuses on measuring discrimination in educational contexts using a specific methodology in India. |
| The provided paper does not directly discuss a discrimination index or how it helps identify and address disparities in education. | |
| The discrimination index helps identify errors in scoring, potentially flawed questions, and confirms the validity of challenging questions, which can help address disparities in education. | |
| The provided paper does not directly address how the discrimination index helps identify and address disparities in education. |
Related Questions
What are the challenges and opportunities for addressing disparities in access to technology in education and promoting digital equity?5 answersAddressing disparities in access to technology in education and promoting digital equity present both challenges and opportunities. Challenges include variations in internet access across age groups, rural-urban divides in connectivity, and the impact of socioeconomic status on technology access and academic achievement. However, technology offers opportunities to bridge these gaps by providing equal access to education for women and girls, empowering them economically and politically. Online learning, despite its challenges, can help minimize academic disparities by improving educational attainment through technology access. To promote digital equity, establishing technology resource centers in schools and fostering public-private partnerships are crucial steps. Overall, while the digital divide poses challenges, leveraging technology can significantly contribute to addressing disparities and promoting equity in education.
Can AI assist in identifying and addressing educational disparities, and if so, how?5 answersAI can play a crucial role in identifying and addressing educational disparities by evaluating fairness and mitigating harmful impacts. Studies emphasize the importance of considering fairness in AI design to prevent amplifying unfairness for certain student categories. Utilizing deep neural networks (DNNs) can predict students' outcomes, potentially benefiting underprivileged groups and promoting equity in higher education. The research highlights the need for interdisciplinary studies to understand the digital disparities faced by educational institutions in developing countries, emphasizing the impact of unawareness and lack of collaboration. By critically interrogating educational AI systems through a lens of structural injustice, it is possible to envision a more equitable future for educational AI.
What is the index of item discrimination of IRT model?4 answersThe index of item discrimination in the IRT model refers to a measure that provides information about individual differences among participants in a test. It helps to estimate the ability of an item to discriminate between individuals with different levels of latent skills. Different item discrimination indices have been proposed and compared in the literature, such as item-total correlation, item-rest correlation, and IRT item discrimination parameter. One specific index, called Kelley's Discrimination Index (DI), is a non-parametric measure that estimates the item discrimination power in educational settings. DI is robust, stable against outliers, and suitable for rough estimation when sophisticated tools like IRT modeling are not available. The generalized DI (GDI) extends DI to polytomous datasets and allows for flexible cut-offs in selecting extreme cases. Overall, item discrimination indices play a crucial role in evaluating the performance and validity of items in the IRT model.
How can i measure race based discrimination?5 answersMeasuring race-based discrimination can be done using various methods. One approach is through self-reported measures, where individuals report their own experiences of discrimination based on race or ethnicity. Another method is through perception studies, where individuals' perceptions of discrimination are examined. Statistical analyses, such as regression models, can also be used to identify discriminatory patterns in hiring and other contexts. Laboratory and field experiments provide controlled environments to study discrimination and its effects. Additionally, market-based tests can be used to uncover unjustified disparate impact, as demonstrated in the study on bail bond markets. Register-based statistics can shed light on objective discrimination by analyzing differences in outcomes. It is important to carefully consider the strengths and limitations of each method to ensure accurate measurement of race-based discrimination.
Can education help to reduce prejudice and discrimination?5 answersEducation can help to reduce prejudice and discrimination by creating less prejudicial individuals. Schools play a crucial role in cultivating a peaceful society by promoting human values and raising awareness about prejudice, discrimination, and alienation. The development of empathy, understanding, cognitive flexibility, and metacognitive thought through education can contribute to reducing prejudice. Additionally, education can address the psychological underpinnings of prejudice, such as stereotypes and individuals' values and belief systems. International education, specifically in K-12 settings, has the potential to reduce prejudice by providing diverse perspectives and drawing on research, theory, and practice. Overall, education can play a significant role in reducing prejudice and discrimination by fostering understanding, promoting awareness, and providing strategies to challenge preconceived beliefs and emotional reactions.
What are the most common inequality indices used in Enviornmental Justice?5 answersThe most common inequality indices used in Environmental Justice are the Gini coefficient and the equally distributed equivalent (EDE) measure. The Gini coefficient is a widely used index that measures income inequality. It has been applied in studies analyzing the distribution of environmental hazards and their impact on minority and poverty-stricken populations. The EDE measure, specifically the Kolm-Pollak EDE, is also used to evaluate the equity of distributions of environmental harm. It takes into account the levels and dispersion of outcome distributions, making it suitable for assessing the distribution of "bads" in environmental justice analyses. These indices provide standardized measures for comparing urban areas and informing policy decisions related to environmental justice.