How does the performance of electric propulsion systems compare to traditional chemical propulsion systems?
Best insight from top research papers
Electric propulsion systems offer various advantages over traditional chemical propulsion systems in terms of efficiency, environmental impact, and future trends. Research compares fully electric and hybrid marine propulsion systems, highlighting the benefits of waste heat recovery and hybrid turbochargers for efficiency enhancement . Additionally, advancements in electric propulsion include various types like electrothermal, electrostatic, and electromagnetic systems, offering flexibility based on mission requirements . Novel designs in electric propulsion focus on improving environmental performance, with systems utilizing electric capacitors for thrust generation . Despite challenges like mass and size limitations, efforts to reduce the weight and dimensions of electric propulsion systems are ongoing, emphasizing the importance of synchronous generators for improved performance and compatibility . Overall, electric propulsion systems demonstrate superior reliability, maneuverability, and safety compared to traditional chemical propulsion systems, aligning with the trend towards electrification in automotive engines .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Electric propulsion systems offer improved reliability, maneuverability, and navigation safety compared to traditional chemical propulsion systems. Efforts to reduce mass and size are ongoing for high-speed vessels. | |
| Electric propulsion systems offer improved environmental performance compared to traditional chemical propulsion systems by utilizing reciprocating motion of charged plates in capacitors to generate thrust efficiently. | |
| Electric propulsion systems, with efficiencies around 90%, outperform traditional chemical propulsion systems limited to under 60% efficiency. Electric systems are cleaner, more environmentally friendly, and enhance engine performance. | |
| Electric propulsion systems offer advantages over traditional chemical systems due to their efficiency, versatility, and various thruster options like Hall Effect, VASIMR, and ion engines, catering to different mission requirements. | |
22 Jun 2022 1 Citations | The paper compares fully electric and hybrid propulsion systems in a marine application, both using variable speed electric generators fueled by natural gas, aiming to enhance efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions. |
Related Questions
What are the potential environmental benefits of replacing traditional cars with electric vehicles?5 answersReplacing traditional cars with electric vehicles offers significant environmental benefits. Electric vehicles contribute to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies show that electric vehicles can lead to cleaner air by eliminating harmful particles and gases emitted from combustion engines, which are linked to various health issues. Additionally, the adoption of electric vehicles can decrease dependence on fossil fuels, promoting sustainability and reducing overall carbon footprint. While the environmental benefits of electric vehicles are substantial, the source of electricity used to power them is crucial. Transitioning to cleaner energy sources for electricity production is essential to maximize the environmental advantages of electric vehicles.
How do electric vehicles compare to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles in terms of environmental impact and cost efficiency?4 answersElectric vehicles (EVs) have lower environmental impact and higher cost efficiency compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. EVs produce zero or minimal pollution, have higher efficiency (over 90%), and lower use and maintenance costs. They also have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save drivers money on fuel costs. However, there are challenges to widespread adoption, such as limited range and charging infrastructure availability. Studies have shown that the use phase of EVs may have higher environmental impacts due to the electricity obtained from the typical grid. Despite this, over 90% of vehicle-owning households in the US would see reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and transportation energy burden by adopting an EV. It is important to address the inequity in EV energy burden for lower-income households through targeted policies, reduced electricity costs, and expanded access to low-carbon transport infrastructure. Overall, EVs offer better environmental protection and potential cost savings, especially when powered by renewable energy sources.
How do electric vehicles compare to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles in terms of environmental sustainability and cost efficiency?5 answersElectric vehicles (EVs) offer several advantages over traditional gasoline-powered vehicles in terms of environmental sustainability and cost efficiency. EVs use electricity stored in rechargeable batteries or fuel cells to power the electric motor, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduced air pollution. They are also more energy-efficient than gasoline-powered vehicles, saving drivers money on fuel costs. However, the environmental benefits of EVs depend on the source of electricity used for charging. While some countries rely on less polluting or non-polluting energy sources, a significant portion of electricity production still comes from fossil fuels. In terms of cost efficiency, EVs may have a higher purchase price, but the total cost of ownership (TCO) over a period of 5 or 10 years can be lower due to factors such as lower maintenance and fuel costs. Additionally, the use of renewable energy sources, such as solar charging, can further reduce daily running costs and contribute to environmental sustainability.
To what extent are electric vehicles more sustainable than traditional combustable engine cars?4 answersElectric vehicles (EVs) offer a more sustainable option compared to traditional combustion engine cars. EVs have the potential to significantly reduce CO2 emissions and global warming potential (GWP). Studies have shown that EVs powered by low carbon electricity can decrease lifecycle CO2-equivalent emissions per passenger-km traveled. In China, BEVs and PHEVs already offer reductions in GWP compared to gasoline ICEVs, although at the expense of increased mineral resource scarcity and toxicity. In Italy, EVs have lower CO2 emissions compared to ICEVs, with cleaner energy mixes playing a significant role. While EVs have the potential to increase vehicle kilometers traveled, there is no distinct rebound effect observed currently. However, the transition to EVs faces challenges such as the slow turnover of the established ICEV fleet and uncertainty regarding battery technology. Overall, EVs show promise for a more sustainable future in the passenger car industry.
How do electric vehicles compare to conventional vehicles in terms of emissions, fuel economy, and performance in india?4 answersElectric vehicles (EVs) in India have lower emissions and better fuel economy compared to conventional vehicles. EVs produce lower CO2 emissions, contributing to reduced air pollution in cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Studies have shown that EVs consume less energy and emit fewer greenhouse gases than gasoline vehicles. The adoption of EVs can lead to a significant reduction in carbon footprint, especially when powered by cleaner energy sources. In terms of performance, EVs have been found to have lower fuel consumption and emissions under urban driving conditions. However, there are challenges to the widespread adoption of EVs in India, such as inadequate charging infrastructure. Overall, EVs offer a more environmentally friendly and efficient alternative to conventional vehicles in India.
How do electric vehicles compare to conventional vehicles in terms of emissions, cost, and performance?5 answersElectric vehicles (EVs) have higher initial manufacturing pollution than conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), leading to increased lifetime CO2 emissions. Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) have emissions between EVs and ICEVs. HEVs with dynamic programming optimization can have lower lifetime emissions than comparable EVs and ICEVs without sacrificing performance. EVs and HEVs are considered good alternatives to ICEVs for reducing tailpipe CO2 emissions. The choice of vehicle segment based on passenger occupancy can optimize energy consumption. FCEVs have a longer range compared to BEVs, but are more expensive. Brushless DC motors are more efficient and perform better, but costlier, while electric vehicles with permanent magnet synchronous motors are considered optimum in terms of efficiency and cost. CO2 emissions are expected to decrease by 2% or more in the future with the use of electric and hybrid vehicles.