Search or ask a question

How interventions based on SIT principles can be implemented to improve intergroup relations?

Realistic conflict theory

Social cognition

Prejudice (legal term)

Contact hypothesis

Intergroup anxiety

Best insight from top research papers

Interventions based on Social Identity Theory (SIT) principles can be implemented to improve intergroup relations by utilizing various forms of intergroup contact, such as direct, extended, vicarious, and imagined contact . These interventions have been successful in reducing prejudicial attitudes, fostering support for conciliatory social policies, and promoting peace-building behaviors . Additionally, interventions can be delivered by satisfying other psychological motivations of the target audience, providing instrumental benefits, embedding the intervention in a captivating medium, or delivering it outside of conscious awareness . It is important to consider moderators, such as types of in- and outgroup categorization, and mediators, such as intergroup anxiety and empathy, that influence the effectiveness of contact interventions . Furthermore, interventions should address societal inequalities and intergroup conflict, going beyond prejudice reduction to promote positive relations among youth from diverse backgrounds .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Journal Article•DOI Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Reduction: Prospects and Challenges in Changing Youth Attitudes Linda R. Tropp, Fiona A. White, Christina L. Rucinski, Colin Tredoux - Show less +3 more 23 Feb 2022-Review of General Psychology 8 Citations	The paper does not specifically discuss interventions based on SIT principles for improving intergroup relations.
Journal Article•DOI Improving intergroup relations Fabian M. H. Schellhaas, John F. Dovidio - Show less +1 more 01 Oct 2016-Current opinion in psychology 15 Citations	The paper does not specifically mention interventions based on SIT principles to improve intergroup relations.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Improving outgroup attitudes in schools: First steps toward a teacher‐led vicarious contact intervention Karmela Liebkind, Viivi Mäkinen, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Tuuli Anna Renvik, Erling Solheim - Show less +4 more 01 Feb 2019-Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 10 Citations	The provided paper does not specifically discuss interventions based on Social Identity Theory (SIT) principles for improving intergroup relations.
Book Chapter•DOI Intergroup Contact Theory Oliver Christ, Mathias Kauff - Show less +1 more 01 Jan 2019 21 Citations	The paper does not specifically mention interventions based on SIT principles for improving intergroup relations.
Open access•Posted Content•DOI Intergroup Psychological Interventions: The Motivational Challenge Davide Dionisi 12 Feb 2023	The paper does not specifically mention interventions based on SIT principles for improving intergroup relations.

My columns

Related Questions

How does prosocial behaviour increase intergroup relations?5 answersProsocial behavior plays a crucial role in enhancing intergroup relations by fostering trust, cooperation, and positive attitudes between different groups. Research suggests that prosocial actions are not only influenced by in-group biases but also by affective traits and empathy. Understanding group stereotypes and promoting empathy towards out-group members can lead to increased prosocial behaviors, ultimately improving intergroup dynamics. Additionally, prosocial behavior, such as sharing, helping, and comforting, contributes to building intergroup relationships by promoting cooperation and reducing conflict. By encouraging prosocial behaviors, especially in children towards refugees, positive intergroup relationships can be cultivated, leading to inclusive and harmonious societies. Ultimately, promoting prosocial behavior is essential in bridging divides between different groups and fostering a sense of unity and cooperation.

What is the effectiveness of intervention groups in comparison to control groups in various research studies?4 answersIntervention groups, particularly group-based interventions, have shown effectiveness in various research studies compared to control groups. Studies have highlighted the positive impact of group interventions on reducing PTSD symptoms in children and adolescents, regardless of the income level of the country. Additionally, interventions focusing on family empowerment have been successful in promoting empowerment, reducing care burden, and enhancing self-compassion in families raising children with disabilities. Moreover, interventions targeting the intolerance of uncertainty have proven to be more effective in reducing psychological distress and improving quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients compared to cognitive behavioral therapy and treatment as usual. These findings collectively emphasize the effectiveness of intervention groups across different populations and settings.

What effect does poor or negative intergroup relations have on society?5 answersPoor or negative intergroup relations in society can have detrimental effects on various aspects. Research suggests that negative contact experiences can exacerbate intergroup bias, potentially leading to increased prejudice and reduced social cohesion. Additionally, negative intergroup contact can increase social dominance orientation (SDO) among advantaged group members, resulting in decreased support for collective action to address inequality. Furthermore, negative intergroup relations may reduce motivation for collective action among disadvantaged groups, as intergroup contact has been associated with less perceived injustice, collective action, and support for social change in these groups. Overall, poor intergroup relations can hinder efforts towards reducing prejudice, promoting equality, and fostering social harmony in society.

What is the efficacy behind theory-driven interventions aimed to reduce racism? Aboriginal Australians?5 answersTheory-driven interventions aimed at reducing racism have shown promising efficacy. Studies have highlighted the importance of utilizing theoretical frameworks, such as critical race theory (CRT) and behavior change theory, in designing interventions to combat racism effectively. CRT, with its focus on counter-storytelling, the permanence of racism, and social justice, can inform critical race media literacy (CRML) interventions to challenge mainstream stereotypes. Additionally, theory-based interventions have been successful in increasing alcohol screening and brief intervention rates in primary care settings, emphasizing the significance of incorporating theoretical principles in intervention design. Furthermore, the study on racism dissemination suggests that effective antiracism education and racist confinement can significantly reduce the spread of racism, highlighting the impact of theory-driven strategies in combating racial prejudices.

How SCT explain intergroup conflict?5 answersThe Social Identity Approach (SIA) provides an understanding of how identity-based motivations interact with social structures to predict intergroup conflict. It recognizes that individuals value and internalize identities relevant to their social, geographic, economic, historical, and political positions, and any devaluation or loss of those identities can be threatening. SIA also explains how procedural justice mechanisms can guide conflicting interests towards common cooperative goals. Additionally, acculturation, the adoption of the victor's cultural traits, can drive intergroup conflict even without providing benefits to individuals or their groups. This process favors the transmission of conflict and can be costly to both the host group and individuals within it. Overall, these theories and approaches shed light on the psychological processes and motivations that contribute to intergroup conflict.

How does intergroup relations relate to organizational identification?3 answersIntergroup relations are related to organizational identification. Perception of intergroup discrimination is linked to perception of organizational conflict, which is mediated by group identification and moderated by organizational identification. The success of formal interventions in fostering cross-unit ties depends on identification with the local unit relative to identification with the broader organization. Structural links are more likely to foster cross-unit ties when organizational identification is high and unit identification is low, while lateral transfers are more likely to result in cross-unit ties when both organizational identification and unit identification are high. Employees' identifications, including personal, interpersonal, micro-group, group, and organizational identifications, are related to organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and the relationship depends on the degree of regularity of within-group interactions and the identification components. Overall, intergroup relations and organizational identification are intertwined and influence various aspects of organizational dynamics and behavior.

See what other people are reading

Where the Blame Lies: Unpacking Groups Into Their Constituent Subgroups Shifts Judgments of Blame in Intergroup Conflict?

Unpacking groups into their constituent subgroups shifts judgments of blame in intergroup conflict by increasing perceived responsibility of the unpacked group for the conflict. This shift is influenced by the victim-perpetrator paradigm, where groups construct and maintain claims to victim status to differentiate themselves from perceived perpetrators. Group identification, particularly with subgroups, plays a crucial role in determining feelings of collective guilt, with high subgroup identifiers experiencing varying levels of guilt based on the presence of a third party. Social psychology highlights the importance of individual judgmental processes in understanding intergroup conflicts, despite conflicts primarily involving groups and institutions. Understanding these dynamics can aid in addressing and potentially resolving intergroup conflicts effectively.What are some of the key concepts and terms used in Blumer's theory on group?

Herbert Blumer's theory on group dynamics and social interaction, particularly in the context of race and prejudice, introduces several key concepts and terms that have significantly influenced sociological thought. At the core of Blumer's theory is the idea of "group position," which suggests that racial prejudice stems from the relative positions groups occupy in a social hierarchy and the competition between them for resources and status. This concept is further elaborated through the notion of "sense of group position," which Blumer posits as a fundamental factor in the formation of racial prejudices, emphasizing how dominant groups perceive threats to their societal status. Blumer's work also delves into the dynamics of "collective behavior," highlighting how societal issues emerge and evolve through the interactions and definitions created by groups in society. This ties closely with his exploration of "symbolic interactionism," a framework that underscores the importance of symbols and meanings in social interactions and how individuals interpret and respond to the actions of others. Another significant term in Blumer's theory is "ontological security," referenced in the context of how white identities, when threatened, can lead to defensive measures to protect their perceived universal group position. This concept is crucial in understanding the psychological underpinnings of prejudice and discrimination. Blumer's emphasis on "social process" as a unifying theme across his work encourages a focus on the activities of people and the dynamic, situational nature of social interactions. This perspective is essential for comprehending the fluidity of social structures and the ongoing negotiation of social positions. Moreover, Blumer's analysis of "civic sociology" and its implications for public policy highlights the challenge of ensuring freedom and equity in a diverse society, stressing the importance of a public philosophy that remains sensitive to human life's pluralized and segmented nature. In summary, Blumer's theory introduces critical concepts such as group position, sense of group position, collective behavior, symbolic interactionism, ontological security, and social process, all of which offer profound insights into the mechanisms of social interaction, prejudice, and the construction of social problems.What is the scientific basis for the concept of mental triggers?

The scientific basis for mental triggers lies in the evidence linking acute mental stress to adverse cardiovascular events like heart attacks and abnormal heart rhythms. Studies have shown that short-term exposures to triggers such as behavioral, psychosocial, and environmental factors can increase the risk of cardiovascular events. These triggers, which represent the final step in the pathophysiological process leading to cardiovascular outcomes, can activate the sympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla, leading to cardiac catastrophes. Additionally, cognitive load during triggering provocations has been found to augment aggression, especially when the trigger is highly salient, highlighting the impact of mental triggers on behavior. Overall, the presence of trigger stimuli can have significant consequences, influencing both physiological and behavioral responses.To what extent does social categorization influence interpersonal communication and connections among individuals of diverse cultural heritage?

Social categorization significantly impacts interpersonal communication and connections among individuals of diverse cultural backgrounds. It serves as a fundamental mechanism for simplifying the social environment, leading to the formation of stereotypes that can influence interactions. Research highlights that people consider multiple group memberships when forming attitudes, affecting intergroup bias. Children as young as 3 years old use social categories to infer intrinsic obligations towards others, shaping their understanding of interpersonal relationships. Factors like identification and symbolic threat play crucial roles in predicting bias across various dimensions of social categorization, emphasizing the complexity of social-cognitive processes in diverse settings. Understanding the development and implications of social categorization is essential for fostering effective communication and connections among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.What is the realistic conflict theory?

Realistic Conflict Theory posits that intergroup conflict arises from disagreements over goals and competition for limited resources, leading to discrimination and negative stereotypes towards out-groups. It heavily relies on psychological premises, particularly social inference theory, to explain conflicts and prejudice. Conflict resolution strategies, such as moral education and common in-group identity models, have been proposed to mitigate conflicts before they escalate. Additionally, the theory has been applied to understand phenomena like Uighur terrorism in Xinjiang, where historical tensions and power dynamics have fueled violent responses. Realistic Conflict Theory offers insights into the complexities of intergroup conflicts and the underlying psychological and social factors contributing to them.Issues/challenges in Baguio City

Baguio City faces various issues and challenges as highlighted in the research papers. These include environmental concerns due to improper disposal of facemasks and medical waste, leading to additional solid waste generation and potential global warming impact. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant changes in work practices, with employees experiencing challenges such as transitioning to online work environments and facing space constraints while working from home. Educational institutions in Baguio City and Benguet Province encounter issues in implementing educational philosophies effectively, despite the widespread application of these philosophies among faculty members. Additionally, persons with disabilities in Basco, Batanes, Philippines, encounter obstacles in employment, education, and social roles due to prejudice and discrimination, impacting their self-esteem and access to opportunities.What are some of the key insights or arguments presented by Brandstetter?

Brandstätter et al. presented insights regarding decision-making processes, particularly in risky choices. They compared various models, including the priority heuristic, expected value (EV) rule, and cumulative prospect theory (CPT), to explain how individuals make decisions between gambles. Brandstätter et al. argued that the EV rule combined with the priority heuristic did not fit as well as the CPT or the transfer of attention exchange (TAX) model in predicting choices. They highlighted the limitations of using an "as-if" model like the EV rule and emphasized the need to consider additional heuristics when explaining decision-making behavior. Brandstätter et al. also suggested that failures of the EV plus priority heuristic model should be seen as evidence for the existence of other decision-making heuristics.What is minority stress?

Minority stress refers to the social stressors, such as discrimination, stigma, and prejudice, experienced by marginalized groups like gender minorities and LGBTQ+ individuals. These stressors can lead to negative mental health effects, including increased psychological distress such as depression and anxiety symptoms. Studies have shown that gender minority youth and LGBTQ+ individuals face unique challenges due to minority stress, impacting their well-being and relationships. Resilience factors like mindfulness, cognitive flexibility, positive identity, and community support have been identified as potential buffers against the negative impacts of minority stress. Recognizing and addressing minority stress is crucial in providing support and interventions to improve the mental health and overall well-being of marginalized communities.What is close relationship?

A close relationship is a specific and multicomponent phenomenon characterized by meaningful, selective connections between individuals to fulfill the need for love and belonging. These relationships involve strong attitudes formed through ongoing contact with significant others, influencing consequential judgments and behaviors. In the context of mobile phone communication, the intensity of relationships is reflected in communication patterns, with distinctions between first and subsequent "best friends" based on age and gender preferences. In pre-modern Arabic texts, discussions on incest and close-kin marriage highlight the historical perspectives on relationship boundaries and marriage impediments. Recent research on automatic processes in close relationships has shed light on how individuals form and update relationship evaluations, impacting relationship dynamics.What does the literature say about racism in classical music in germany?

The literature on racism in classical music in Germany reveals a complex and multifaceted issue that spans historical, racial, and cultural dimensions. Kira Thurman's work highlights the racial thinking and racism that inform the reception of black musicians' performances in Central Europe, demonstrating how race is at the heart of how German classical music is experienced by audiences, particularly in the context of performances by black musicians. This is further elaborated by Friederike Kind-Kovács, who discusses the historical debates and the symbolic gestures of protest against American racism through the applauding of African American concert performers in Germany. Roman Gleissner adds to this by examining the obstacles faced by black musicians in Germany, including stereotyped casting and the dual performance of racism and antiracism in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Kira Thurman also argues that black performances of German music challenged audiences' definitions of blackness, whiteness, and German music, forcing a reconsideration of German national identity in relation to race. The broader debates on diversity and racialised representations in Western cultural industries, as discussed by Kristina Kolbe, also touch upon the reproduction of ‘race’-making logics within the classical music scene. Andree Hahmann's analysis of racist ideas in the works of classical philosophers like Kant and Hegel, and their influence on German culture, provides a philosophical backdrop to the discussion. Sahar al-Shoubaki addresses the discrimination faced by East Asian musicians in Western European orchestras, pointing to a structural Eurocentric hypocrisy within the classical music industry. Annkatrin Dahm examines anti-Semitism and racial prejudice against Jews in German music literature, while Dalia Marmer et al. discuss the portrayal of Africa and African people in German educational materials, highlighting the racial prejudices that students of African descent experience. Finally, David Goodman outlines the racial coding of classical music in the 1930s and the category-defying aspirations of black classical performers, emphasizing the symbolic importance of their careers to the African American community. Together, these works paint a detailed picture of the pervasive racism within the classical music scene in Germany, spanning from historical prejudices to contemporary challenges faced by musicians of color.What are the difficulties the disabled persons are facing?

Persons with disabilities face various challenges in different aspects of their lives. They encounter difficulties in employment due to prejudice and discrimination in the workplace. Additionally, they struggle with finding work, facing mistrust from family, discrimination from employers, and transportation issues. In education, they experience obstacles such as poverty and discrimination from classmates. Furthermore, the disabled community encounters discrimination and stereotyping within their communities. Financial problems, especially concerning medication costs, also pose significant challenges for individuals with disabilities. Overall, these barriers contribute to lower employment rates, lower earnings, and difficulties in accessing adequate social support, exacerbating the economic disparities faced by people with disabilities.