scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How is the probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution characterized? 


Best insight from top research papers

The probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution is characterized by the fact that it is the only distribution for which the sample mean and variance are independent . This property is known as the Geary theorem. The standard normal distribution is also characterized by having a mean of zero and a variance of one. Additionally, the normal distribution is the only distribution for which the sum of a large number of independent variables is asymptotically distributed like a Gaussian distribution, as stated by the central limit theorem . The standard normal distribution is commonly used in engineering and scientific applications, and it is often represented by standardized random variables with means equal to zero and variances equal to one .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution is characterized by a mean of zero and a variance of one.
The probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution is characterized by a Gaussian distribution.
The paper describes various characteristic constants and parameters for probability distributions, including the standard deviation for a random variable with a standard normal distribution.
The probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution is characterized by a bell-shaped curve.
Open accessPosted Content
Eric Benhamou, Beatrice Guez, Nicolas Paris 
02 Oct 2018-arXiv: Probability
3 Citations
The probability distribution function of a random variable with a standard normal distribution is characterized by the fact that the sample mean and variance are independent.

Related Questions

Are the point estimates for median and mean with normal distribution the same?4 answersPoint estimates for the median and mean with a normal distribution are not the same. The median and mean are different summary statistics that can provide distinct insights into the data. In the context of normal approximation for point estimation, the median and mean are treated differently, with the normal approximation being reliable for estimating ratios of medians of log-normal distributions. Additionally, in the context of phylogenetic studies, the geometric median and Frechet mean are defined as summary statistics for posterior samples, showcasing the differences in estimating the median and mean in a Bayesian phylogenetic setting. Therefore, while both the median and mean are essential measures, they serve different purposes and can yield different point estimates, especially in diverse statistical contexts.
What is the normal distribution curve?5 answersThe normal distribution curve, also known as the bell-shaped curve, is a fundamental concept in statistics and probability theory. It represents a symmetrical distribution where the mean, median, and mode are all equal or approximately equal, making it easy to analyze and understand data. The curve is characterized by its bell shape, with 68% of the data falling within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% within two standard deviations, and 99.7% within three standard deviations. While real-life data rarely follow a perfect normal distribution, tests like skewness and kurtosis assessments are used to evaluate how closely a dataset resembles a normal curve. The normal distribution's significance spans various fields, including statistics, business, epidemiology, and medicine, where it serves as a crucial model for analyzing and interpreting data.
Does the normal distribution focus on the most likely outcomes?5 answersThe normal distribution is often used to describe the most likely outcomes in various fields such as finance, hydrology, and adhesive joint testing. While it is a theoretical distribution and rarely perfectly observed in reality, it is still applicable in many cases where the variation is due to objective factors or inaccuracies in measurement. In finance, for example, risk averse agents who hold government bonds and a few equities often rely on the normal distribution to evaluate the risks associated with their portfolios. In hydrology, the normal distribution is used as a frequency distribution to analyze the goodness-of-fit of data. Similarly, in adhesive joint testing, the normal distribution is applied to describe the scatter of test results. Overall, while the normal distribution may not always perfectly represent real-world data, it is still a useful tool for understanding and analyzing various phenomena.
Explain the term random variable in probability?4 answersA random variable is a mathematical tool used to describe the outcomes of a random experiment. It represents the possible numerical results of the experiment and can be discrete or continuous. Discrete random variables have a finite or countable number of possible values, while continuous random variables can take on any value within a certain range. The probability distribution of a random variable describes the pattern of probabilities associated with each possible outcome. Random variables are important in probability theory as they allow us to make inferences about populations based on sample data. They are symbolized with capital letters and their individual values are represented either with a capital Roman letter followed by a subscript or with a lowercase letter.
How does the beta distribution differ from other well-known distributions, such as the normal distribution?4 answersThe beta distribution differs from other well-known distributions, such as the normal distribution, in terms of its flexibility and ability to model continuous proportions with zeros or ones. The beta distribution is used to describe the continuous component of a mixed continuous-discrete distribution, which assumes a probability mass at zero or one. The density of the beta distribution can have a wide range of shapes depending on the values of its two parameters, allowing for greater flexibility in modeling different types of data. In contrast, the normal distribution is symmetric and bell-shaped, making it suitable for modeling continuous variables that do not have a bounded range. The beta distribution also has different moments and order statistics compared to other distributions, such as the gamma, Weibull, and generalized exponential distributions.
How can skewness be used to determine the normality of a distribution?5 answersSkewness can be used to determine the normality of a distribution by assessing the level of asymmetry in the data. Skewness measures the extent to which the distribution deviates from symmetry. A positive skewness indicates a longer tail on the right side of the distribution, while a negative skewness indicates a longer tail on the left side. If the skewness is close to zero, it suggests that the distribution is approximately symmetric. However, it is important to note that skewness alone is not sufficient to determine normality. Other factors, such as kurtosis and tests for normality, should also be considered.

See what other people are reading

What is the significance of stop-loss orders in risk management for FX trading?
4 answers
What is the 27th percentile of the following set of data?91, 61, 50, 40, 83?
5 answers
What is the 27th percentile of the following set of data?91, 61, 50, 40, 83?
5 answers
What are continuous variables and discrete variables?
5 answers
What are continuous variables ?
5 answers
What are continuous variables and discrete variables?
5 answers
What are continuous variables ?
5 answers
What are the main advantages and disadvantages of random forest?
5 answers
Random Forest (RF) offers advantages such as high predictive accuracy, robust performance with low sample sizes, and reduction in forecast variance. However, challenges arise in feature selection, as RF may scatter important features across the gene network, conflicting with biological assumptions. Additionally, in large-scale applications, the size of RF models can become unwieldy, especially when deployed on memory-constrained devices, necessitating model size reduction techniques like approximating fitted trees. While RF excels in prediction accuracy and performance, issues with feature selection and model size can be mitigated through modern approaches like Graph Random Forest (GRF) for improved feature selection and model interpretability.
How does regular maintenance contribute to overall safety in the workplace?
5 answers
Regular maintenance plays a crucial role in enhancing overall safety in the workplace. By ensuring that equipment is well-maintained and functioning properly, the risk of accidents and injuries is significantly reduced. Proper maintenance not only increases the reliability of machinery but also helps in preventing dangerous situations that may arise due to lack of maintenance or inadequate upkeep. Additionally, maintenance operations themselves can pose risks, making it essential for operators to be well-trained to avoid incorrect actions that could lead to accidents or production stoppages. Implementing preventive maintenance measures, such as regular inspections and timely repairs, not only ensures the safety of employees but also contributes to the economic performance of work equipment by maintaining its reliability and functionality.
What are the main advantages and disadvantages of Random Forest??
5 answers
Random Forest (RF) offers advantages such as high predictive accuracy, robustness in handling large datasets with many features, and reduced variance in forecasts. However, challenges include the potential for large model sizes in extensive applications, especially when deploying models to memory-constrained devices, necessitating methods to approximate RF models without sacrificing prediction quality. Additionally, traditional variable importance metrics like 'out of bag' (OOB) VIMPs in RF models may have limitations, including bias towards correlated features and reduced interpretability, highlighting the need for more modern and unbiased approaches like knockoff VIMPs for meaningful feature selection and result interpretation. These considerations underscore the importance of balancing RF's strengths with strategies to address its limitations for optimal model performance and utility.
How does Pearson's chi-square test differ from other chi-square tests?
4 answers
Pearson's chi-square test differs from other chi-square tests in its focus on goodness-of-fit for various hypotheses about observed frequency distributions in contingency tables. While Pearson's test is well-established and commonly used, it is crucial to note that its performance depends significantly on the binning of data in continuous distributions. Unlike other tests like the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Anderson-Darling tests, Pearson's chi-square test can be competitive and sometimes superior when an optimal binning strategy is employed. Additionally, Pearson's chi-square test is widely used for determining independence between two categorical variables, making it distinct from other chi-square tests that may focus on different types of statistical analyses. Overall, Pearson's chi-square test stands out for its versatility in testing various hypotheses in contingency tables and assessing goodness-of-fit in different scenarios.