scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How the conservation law of ataturk legacy poisoned intellectual life in Turkey? 


Best insight from top research papers

The conservation law of Ataturk's legacy has had a significant impact on intellectual life in Turkey. The legacy of Ataturk, who promoted united nationalism and future-oriented thinking, has created a struggle between different ideologies within Turkish society . This struggle is reflected in the weak political institutions within Turkey, which have hindered policy-making and the ability to address economic challenges . Additionally, the conservation of cultural assets and the protection of world cultural heritage have become important legal issues in Turkey, with significant changes made to national legislation in recent years . These changes aim to integrate cultural assets with contemporary life and comply with international law . However, the implementation of conservation laws and the protection of natural resources have faced challenges, such as illegal hunting practices and the destruction of wildlife habitats . Overall, the conservation law of Ataturk's legacy has influenced intellectual life in Turkey by shaping political structures, legal frameworks, and the approach to cultural heritage conservation.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The provided paper does not discuss how the conservation law of Ataturk's legacy poisoned intellectual life in Turkey. The paper focuses on the conservation of biodiversity and protected areas in Turkey.
The provided paper does not discuss how the conservation law of Ataturk's legacy poisoned intellectual life in Turkey.
The provided paper does not discuss how the conservation law of Ataturk's legacy poisoned intellectual life in Turkey.
The provided paper does not discuss how the conservation law of Atatürk's legacy poisoned intellectual life in Turkey.

Related Questions

How ataturk legacy conservation history poisned intellectual life in Turkey?5 answersThe legacy of Ataturk's conservation history in Turkey has had a negative impact on intellectual life in the country. The anti-intellectual sentiments and negative thoughts towards intellectualism were strong in post-WWII political Islamist thought and movement, which shaped the mindset of Islamist youth. Additionally, the focus on the tangible and intangible values of Ataturk Forest Farm, representing Ataturk's heritage of ideas, has overshadowed the comprehensive understanding and association of these values. Ataturk's emphasis on a new philosophy and education policy for the Republic, while necessary, has also contributed to the struggle between different political and social beliefs within the country. Furthermore, the ideological tug-of-war between Ataturk's united nationalism and Nasreddin Hoca's individualistic message has created a struggle within the Turkish Society for the Protection of Nature, impacting their environmental education efforts. Overall, Ataturk's legacy in conservation and education has had complex and varied effects on intellectual life in Turkey.
How many types of conservation law?5 answersThere are four types of conservation law mentioned in the abstracts.
What is the role of the ruling elite in Turkey's foreign policy?4 answersThe ruling elite in Turkey plays a significant role in shaping the country's foreign policy. They have pursued a shift in foreign policy from a focus on interdependence and soft power to a quest for strategic autonomy, accompanied by interventionism and coercive diplomacy. This shift serves as a legitimating foreign policy discourse for the government to mobilize its electoral base, fragment opposition, and accrue popular support. The ruling elite has also emphasized the importance of internal transformation and stability in Turkey, allowing the country to emerge as a sponsor of peace in the Middle East. However, the Arab Spring and the subsequent support for opponents of dictator governments have led to problematic relations with many states, moving away from the previous "zero problem policy". The ruling elite's foreign policy roles have also changed, with a shift towards harder roles requiring material capabilities in response to the Arab uprisings. Overall, the ruling elite's decisions and actions have a significant impact on Turkey's foreign policy direction and relationships with other countries.
Law of electricity conservation?5 answersThe law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only converted into another form. This principle applies to the electric charge as well, which cannot be created or destroyed. However, there are claims of devices that break the law of conservation of energy, such as a clean energy device of a static electricity generator. This device supposedly creates extra electric energy, contradicting the law of conservation of energy. It is important to note that these claims are not generally accepted and may not be valid. In the context of electricity conservation policies, it is found that direct consumption curtailment policies may not be effective in mitigating the electricity crisis. Instead, improving energy efficiency and setting targets for reducing energy intensity are recommended to conserve electricity and enhance sectorial output.
What were the main criticisms of Kemal Ataturk's ideas?5 answersCritics of Kemal Ataturk's ideas raised several main criticisms. One criticism was that Kemalism, the ideology associated with Ataturk, was not egalitarian towards religious and ethnic minorities. Another criticism was that Kemalism was seen as authoritarian, elitist, and supportive of the status quo. Some critics also questioned Ataturk's methods of implementing secularism and nationalism, viewing them as lacking substance. Additionally, Ataturk's quest for modernism was seen by some as supporting dictatorship and autocracy. Overall, these criticisms highlight concerns about the treatment of minorities, the authoritarian nature of Kemalism, and the perceived lack of substance in Ataturk's ideas.
How did USSR help Ataturk?3 answersThe USSR provided aid to Turkey, specifically guns, grain, and gold, between 1920 and 1922. This collaboration between the Bolshevik internationalists and the Turkish National Forces was seen as a pragmatic union born out of necessity and national self-interest. However, it can also be understood in the context of Moscow's other anti-imperialist commitments, as the Soviet-Turkish partnership marked the beginning of decolonization efforts in which the USSR played a prominent role. Through their support of Turkey, the Soviet leadership transitioned from military support of an anticolonial movement to economic support of a postcolonial state.