scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How to send IP stream, packet through two ZigBee devices? 


Best insight from top research papers

To send an IP stream or packet through two ZigBee devices, a cross-layer design called Amphista can be used. Amphista enables a ZigBee device to send different pieces of information to both the WiFi gateway and another ZigBee device using a single ZigBee data stream . This is achieved by leveraging WiFi's fine-grained channel state information to extract the concurrently transmitted ZigBee-to-WiFi message from time overlapped ZigBee and WiFi packets . Additionally, a novel forwarding protocol is designed to simultaneously forward uplink (collecting sensing data) and downlink (disseminating control messages) data using the same ZigBee data stream . This cross-layer design significantly improves throughput (up to 400x) and reduces latency .

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
Patent
Chen Feng, Huang Yufang 
15 Jun 2018
1 Citations
The provided paper does not mention how to send IP stream or packets through two ZigBee devices. The paper focuses on a ZigBee secure communication method based on RSA encryption.
The provided paper does not mention how to send an IP stream or packet through two ZigBee devices. The paper focuses on a novel cross-layer design for IoT communication and data forwarding using a single ZigBee data stream.
The provided paper does not specifically mention how to send IP stream or packet through two ZigBee devices. The paper focuses on proposing a ZigBee Multipath Hierarchical Tree Routing (Z-MHTR) protocol to enhance application performance in terms of packet delivery ratio, end to end delay, and network lifetime in cluster-tree wireless sensor networks.
The provided paper does not mention sending IP stream or packet through two ZigBee devices. The paper focuses on a cross-layer design for IoT communication and data forwarding using a single ZigBee data stream.

Related Questions

How does the use of Arduino and XBee technology impact the efficiency of greenhouse environmental monitoring and control?5 answersThe use of Arduino and XBee technology in greenhouse environmental monitoring and control has a significant impact on efficiency. These technologies enable the automation and remote monitoring of greenhouse conditions, leading to improved plant growth and productivity. Arduino microcontrollers are used to automatically monitor and regulate ambient conditions such as temperature, humidity, and light intensity. The data collected from sensors is processed by Arduino, allowing for real-time monitoring and control of the greenhouse environment. XBee wireless communication technology, such as ZigBee, is integrated into the system to enable communication between sensors, actuators, and the central control unit. This wireless connectivity eliminates the need for manual intervention and enables the system to respond quickly to changes in environmental conditions. Overall, the use of Arduino and XBee technology enhances the efficiency of greenhouse environmental monitoring and control by providing automation, remote access, and real-time data analysis capabilities.
What is zigbee used for in vehicle communication?5 answersZigBee is used for vehicle communication in various ways. It is used in a monitoring system for remote monitoring of the motion state of transported goods. ZigBee, along with Wi-Fi and DSRC, is investigated for its performance in an Internet of Vehicles (IoV) system, where it enables successful exchange of data with low failure rates. ZigBee is also used in an assisted driving system to establish local area networks and ensure continuous and reliable communication between vehicles. Additionally, ZigBee is proposed for dynamic platoon formation in truck platooning, allowing for identification of obstructed vehicles and facilitating overtaking. Finally, ZigBee is used in a vehicle control system to prevent damage by alerting vehicles exceeding height limits through communication.
Are there recent studies uses two iot technologies in one system?4 answersRecent studies have been conducted on the use of IoT technologies in combination within a single system. These studies aim to explore the integration of different IoT technologies to enhance safety levels in complex workplaces. Additionally, research has been conducted on the security analysis of IoT platform file systems used in various environments. The analysis focused on two mechanical platforms, Tizen and Linux, and examined file system metadata to understand the structure and recoverability of data. Furthermore, a comparative study has been conducted on short-range and long-range communication technologies used in IoT. This study provides insights into the frequency bands, power consumption, range, cost, security, standards, and throughput of these technologies, enabling the development of efficient IoT solutions. Overall, these studies highlight the importance of integrating multiple IoT technologies and addressing security concerns in order to optimize IoT systems.
Can the combination of RTP/RTCP and SIP operate in a wireless environment?2 answersYes, the combination of RTP/RTCP and SIP can operate in a wireless environment. The papers by Wang et al. and Bin et al. propose schemes for SIP operating through NAT with the cooperation of SIP server and RTP relay server. They describe the implementation of how SIP can traverse different types of NAT and reduce packet loss under a wireless network. Additionally, the paper by Hemmati and Moghadam focuses on the vertical handover management and uses an extension of SIP to support vertical handover with bicasting, improving latency and throughput. Furthermore, the paper by Wu et al. discusses the support of mobility in SIP-based VoIP protocols and proposes solutions for guaranteeing QoS of VoIP service in a mobile environment. These papers demonstrate that RTP/RTCP and SIP can effectively operate in a wireless environment.
How do I change my Internet connection on ecobee?10 answers
How do I connect my Sony PSP to the Internet wirelessly?10 answers

See what other people are reading

Why is election based method better than selection for senior prefects in schools?
5 answers
Why is election based method better than selection for senior prefects in schools?
5 answers
Is there a sensor that can detect worms inside of an eggplant?
5 answers
Is there a sensor that can detect worms inside of an eggplant?
5 answers
Lack of protocols for addressing traffic delays during delivery, is that necessary for the management?
5 answers
What are the potential benefits of mercury treatment for neurological disorders?
5 answers
What are the potential benefits of mercury treatment for neurological disorders?
5 answers
What are the key differences in terms of hardware architecture and processing power between ESP8266 and Raspberry Pi?
5 answers
The ESP8266 and Raspberry Pi differ significantly in terms of hardware architecture and processing power. The ESP8266 is a highly integrated chip primarily used for providing internet connectivity in IoT applications. It is designed as a system-on-a-chip (SOC) with GPIO pins for various input/output functionalities. In contrast, the Raspberry Pi is a single-board computer capable of running a full operating system like Linux, making it suitable for more complex tasks such as acting as a main server in a wireless sensor network. While the ESP8266 is often used as a WiFi module for microcontrollers, the Raspberry Pi offers more processing power and flexibility, enabling it to handle tasks like noise removal and edge detection in real-time medical images using OpenCV software.
What are the current state of plug and play solutions for transducers in literature?
5 answers
Current literature presents various plug-and-play solutions for transducers. The IEEE 1451 standard is a common framework for integrating smart transducers into industrial applications, offering self-identification and data communication standardization. However, existing solutions like IEEE 1451 are limited when connecting plain transducers to Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) nodes without additional components. To address this, a novel mechanism has been proposed to enable plug-and-play connections for off-the-shelf sensors with popular digital interfaces. Moreover, research emphasizes the importance of bridging the semantic gap between control applications and smart transducers for improved interoperability. Efforts are being made to develop plug-and-play technologies specifically tailored for small sensors and actuators in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs).
How the RL framework help solve service overlay planning problem in manet scenarios?
5 answers
The RL framework plays a crucial role in addressing service overlay planning problems in MANET scenarios by optimizing decision-making processes. NeuroPlan, a deep RL approach, utilizes a graph neural network for state encoding and a two-stage hybrid approach to efficiently solve network planning problems. Additionally, the Flexible Routing Decision (FRD) framework proposes a novel routing decision-making process using multiple metric types to support application-level QoS requirements in MANETs. By leveraging RL methods, such as actor-critic reinforcement learning, these frameworks enhance the efficiency of path discovery and routing decisions while considering dynamic network conditions and diverse QoS requirements in MANET environments. This integration of RL techniques in service overlay planning contributes to cost reduction and improved performance in MANET scenarios.
Does AVNN from HRV have any other name?
5 answers
AVNN from HRV, which stands for the average of all the NN intervals, is also known as the mean NN. This alternative name for AVNN is derived from a study that aimed to reduce the number of heartbeats required for HRV estimation to enable real-time monitoring. The research proposed a deep learning-based system, specifically a recurrent neural network, for the inference of AVNN and another HRV feature, IHR (instantaneous heart rate), from a shorter ECG interval of about 1 minute. The results indicated that AVNN and IHR can be accurately inferred from this shorter ECG interval, with a mean error of less than 5% of the computed HRV features, showcasing the feasibility of real-time monitoring using these alternative names for HRV parameters.