Search or ask a question

How two social group mediates violent conflict?

Conflict resolution

Realistic conflict theory

Social identity theory

Group development

Best insight from top research papers

Two social groups can mediate violent conflict by engaging in processes such as conflict mediation, interactive conflict resolution, and individual-level interventions. Conflict mediation involves the training of mediators who facilitate discussions between conflicting parties to address relationship issues and develop mutually acceptable solutions . Interactive conflict resolution directly engages representatives of conflicting parties in intensive discussions facilitated by a third-party team to promote attitude change, deescalation, and peace building . Individual-level interventions can increase positive feelings towards the outgroup and provide psychological, social, and material resources that influence behaviors contributing to peace, such as policing, advocacy, and political action . These interventions are influenced by contextual factors such as access to resources, social positions, and political institutions . By addressing social injustices, invoking social identities, and encouraging nonviolent actions, these processes can mitigate violent conflict escalation .

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Book Chapter•DOI Applying Group Processes to International Conflict Analysis and Resolution Ronald J. Fisher 01 Jan 2002 4 Citations	The provided paper does not directly address how two social groups mediate violent conflict.
Journal Article•DOI Addressing Violent Intergroup Conflict from the Bottom Up Ruth K. Ditlmann, Cyrus Samii, Thomas Zeitzoff - Show less +2 more 01 Jan 2017-Social Issues and Policy Review 12 Citations	The paper does not directly address how two social groups mediate violent conflict. The paper focuses on interventions that engage ordinary citizens in settings of violent conflict and how these interventions can affect broader conflict dynamics.
Book Chapter•DOI Social Identity and Justice in Violent Conflicts – A Dynamic Model of Intergroup Conflict Ronald Fischer 01 Jan 2011 1 Citations	The paper does not specifically discuss how two social groups mediate violent conflict.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Mediación de conflictos y violencia escolar: Resultados de intervención a través de un estudio cuasi-experimental Edgar Guillermo Pulido Guerrero, Lorena Cudris Torres, María Margarita Tirado Vides, Luz Karine Jiménez Ruiz - Show less +3 more 28 Dec 2020 3 Citations	The provided paper does not specifically discuss how two social groups mediate violent conflict. It focuses on the effect of conflict mediation on the perception of school violence.

My columns

Related Questions

What is social conflict?4 answersSocial conflict refers to violent feuds or physical clashes between community groups, leading to insecurity, social disintegration, and disrupting stability and development. Conflict is inherent in human life, serving as a catalyst for socio-political dynamics and change, with both positive and negative impacts. Coser categorizes social conflicts into realistic, non-realistic, in-group, and out-group conflicts, highlighting their functions and outcomes. Various social environments contribute to conflict generation, necessitating an understanding of the sources of social struggles for effective conflict resolution. Chronic disagreements in workplaces often stem from structural, organizational, and relational issues, leading to tensions and conflicts that require prevention and resolution strategies. Overall, social conflict is a complex phenomenon influenced by social, economic, and political factors, impacting individuals, groups, and societies.

Importance of Social Media in Modern Conflicts?5 answersSocial media plays a crucial role in modern conflicts by influencing communication, information dissemination, and participation. It has become a significant tool during crises, such as natural disasters, civil wars, and political conflicts, enabling real-time updates and engaging a wide range of participants, including civilians. Social media platforms like Facebook have facilitated communication among protestors during events like the Arab Spring. However, the use of social media in conflicts is not without challenges, as it can also lead to the spread of fake news, terrorism propaganda, and disinformation, impacting trust and legitimacy. Despite its advantages in overcoming traditional communication barriers, social media's role in conflicts requires careful consideration due to issues of credibility and the multiplicity of narratives.

How does social identity mediates relationship between violent conflict and social development?5 answersSocial identity plays a mediating role in the relationship between violent conflict and social development. Individuals' experience of political violence is shaped by the groups they belong to, and social identity processes influence their attitudes and behaviors. Competing social identities can lead to group conflict, but they can also foster individual belonging and bring together groups in conflict. In conflict-affected regions like Northern Ireland, national identification mediates the impact of direct political violence on well-being. Understanding how youth develop social identities and the consequences for peaceful and violent behaviors is crucial for designing effective policies and interventions. Overall, social identity is a key factor in understanding the dynamics of violent conflict and its impact on social development.

How does social media impact civil wars?4 answersSocial media has a significant impact on civil wars. It has been found that more time spent on social media, greater social media penetration, and the specific manner in which elites use social media are associated with an increased number and severity of civil conflicts. Social media also plays a role in the peace process, as it can be used as a tool for dialogue, debate, organization, and mobilization, and can influence public sentiment towards the peace process. Rebel organizations in civil conflicts can use social media as a form of public diplomacy to garner international support by projecting a favorable image and clarifying their intentions and the atrocities perpetrated by the government. Additionally, social media has revolutionized the way conflicts are witnessed, allowing for the quick and widespread dissemination of images and news, which can either promote peace or facilitate illicit operations that spread instability and violence. Overall, social media has become a vital tool in times of conflict and crisis, including civil wars.

Does Social Media Influence Conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza Conflict?4 answersSocial media has been found to influence conflict dynamics, as evidenced by studies on the 2012 Gaza Conflict. Specifically, shifts in international public support via social media have been shown to reduce conflict intensity, particularly for Israel. This effect is greater than the influence of key international actors such as the United States, Egypt, and United Nations. Additionally, social media has been found to change traditional-media news on conflicts, with online posts by citizen journalists altering the extent, tonality, and content of traditional-media reporting. This shift towards information from ordinary people has been shown to focus more on the suffering of civilians and less on the role of foreign policy or elections, potentially favoring the side of the conflict with more civilian casualties. Overall, social media's influence on conflict is complex and multifaceted, shaping the strategies of conflict actors and the narratives surrounding conflicts.

To what extent is social media induced conflict a problem?5 answersSocial media induced conflict is a significant problem due to its influence on communication, information dissemination, and the shaping of conflict itself. Social media reduces the costs of communication and increases the speed and dissemination of information, making it a powerful tool for politicians, leaders, insurgents, and protestors. It has played a role in shaping national and global political landscapes, as seen in incidents like the Iranian elections and popular uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East. Moreover, social media's role in spreading misinformation has contributed to rising political polarization. In the case of Manipur, social media has exacerbated ethnic tensions and the hill-valley divide, with local media being greatly influenced by local politics. Overall, social media induced conflict poses challenges in terms of communication, information integrity, and societal divisions.

See what other people are reading

Is social exculsion a factor for children to become child soldiers?

Social exclusion can indeed be a significant factor leading children to become child soldiers. Research indicates that children may voluntarily join armed groups due to mistreatment within their families, exposure to violence, and issues of loyalty, seeking a new sense of belonging and identity. Additionally, social identity plays a powerful role in children's recruitment, especially in conflicts where entire families and communities are militarized. Factors such as family dynamics, societal perceptions, and previous exposure to war can shape a child's decision to join a military group, challenging the stereotypical image of passive child soldiers. Moreover, children born of war, often perceived as children of the enemy, may experience rejection, leading to lower self-worth and trust, which can further influence their involvement in armed groups.What are the recent theories on group conflicts within sociology?

Recent theories on group conflicts within sociology emphasize the multifaceted nature of intergroup dynamics, incorporating insights from various disciplines to understand the mechanisms and outcomes of conflicts. Social identity theory, as explored in the clinical environment, highlights how health care professionals self-categorize into groups, leading to conflicts that can impede collaborative practice. This theory suggests that educational strategies promoting inclusivity and perspective-taking may help manage intergroup conflict. Similarly, evolutionary and economic models of group conflict have been contrasted with sociological and psychological findings, revealing that factors such as group size, success, and other-regarding preferences play significant roles in group conflicts. This body of work suggests that group conflicts have been instrumental in the evolution of cooperation among individuals, pointing to the importance of parochial altruism and social identities in these dynamics. Conflict theory within sociology has been extensively used to analyze how social groups compete for scarce resources, with a substantial portion of sociological research documenting the dynamics and consequences of social inequality. This paradigm extends beyond economic class to include race, gender, and other forms of group competition, highlighting the pervasive nature of conflict in structuring social relations. Moreover, the broad category of conflict theory encompasses theories explaining crime and deviance through various lenses of conflict, indicating its central role in human social interaction. Experimental research on the impact of political institutions within groups on inter-group conflict development has shown that democratic decision-making processes can intensify conflicts, suggesting that the structure of group decision-making significantly influences conflict dynamics. Additionally, the perception of intergroup forgiveness versus revenge in the context of social status within groups indicates that forgiveness is often viewed as more status-worthy, signaling a preference for behaviors that are perceived to contribute positively to group cohesion. Furthermore, the necessity for groups in intergroup conflict to overcome collective action problems highlights the complexity of organizing for defense against external threats. This complexity underscores the profound effects of external conflict on group organization, as evidenced by research in cultural evolution and evolutionary psychology. Together, these recent theories in sociology provide a comprehensive understanding of group conflicts, emphasizing the importance of social identity, resource competition, decision-making structures, and collective action in shaping intergroup dynamics.What's the relationship between social thinking and prejudice?

Social thinking and prejudice are intricately linked, as evidenced by various research studies. Studies have shown that social dominance orientation (SDO) is directly associated with materialist values and inversely associated with post-materialistic values, indicating a relationship between social dominance and certain psychosocial values. Furthermore, the intention to engage in social conflict behavior is influenced by stereotypes, social identity, and prejudice, with a significant positive relationship found between these factors and the intention of social conflict. Additionally, research has highlighted how moral prejudices, stemming from self-interest, can impact social preferences and lead to a shift from altruistic to selfish orientations in resource allocation decision-making processes. These findings collectively emphasize the complex interplay between social thinking, values, stereotypes, and prejudices in shaping attitudes and behaviors within society.Where the Blame Lies: Unpacking Groups Into Their Constituent Subgroups Shifts Judgments of Blame in Intergroup Conflict?

Unpacking groups into their constituent subgroups shifts judgments of blame in intergroup conflict by increasing perceived responsibility of the unpacked group for the conflict. This shift is influenced by the victim-perpetrator paradigm, where groups construct and maintain claims to victim status to differentiate themselves from perceived perpetrators. Group identification, particularly with subgroups, plays a crucial role in determining feelings of collective guilt, with high subgroup identifiers experiencing varying levels of guilt based on the presence of a third party. Social psychology highlights the importance of individual judgmental processes in understanding intergroup conflicts, despite conflicts primarily involving groups and institutions. Understanding these dynamics can aid in addressing and potentially resolving intergroup conflicts effectively.What is the theory of Herbert Blumer on ethnocentrism?

Herbert Blumer's theory, while not directly addressing ethnocentrism, provides a valuable framework for understanding the phenomenon through his methodological and theoretical contributions to social research and symbolic interactionism. Blumer emphasized the importance of understanding human behavior by considering individuals' interpretations and meanings attached to their actions and interactions within society. This perspective is crucial for analyzing ethnocentrism, which involves the belief in the superiority of one's own group over others. Blumer's focus on the role of symbols and meanings in social interactions can help explain how ethnocentric attitudes are formed, communicated, and sustained within groups. Ethnocentrism, as conceptualized in various studies, involves a preference for one's in-group over out-groups, often leading to prejudice and discrimination. Blumer's theory suggests that these attitudes are not inherent but are developed through social interactions where meanings and values associated with one's own group and others are interpreted and internalized. This interpretation process is influenced by broader social factors, including social norms and representations, which can either exacerbate or mitigate ethnocentric tendencies. Moreover, Blumer's emphasis on the empirical investigation of social phenomena through participant observation and qualitative analysis aligns with the methodologies used to study ethnocentrism in various cultural and social contexts. His approach encourages researchers to delve into the subjective experiences of individuals, offering insights into the complex dynamics of ethnocentrism, including its causes and manifestations across different cultures. In summary, while Herbert Blumer did not explicitly theorize about ethnocentrism, his methodological and theoretical contributions provide a robust framework for understanding the social construction of ethnocentric attitudes and behaviors. By focusing on the meanings and interpretations that individuals attach to their in-group and out-group distinctions, Blumer's work offers valuable insights into the mechanisms through which ethnocentrism is developed and sustained within societies.What are some of the key concepts and terms used in Blumer's theory on group?

Herbert Blumer's theory on group dynamics and social interaction, particularly in the context of race and prejudice, introduces several key concepts and terms that have significantly influenced sociological thought. At the core of Blumer's theory is the idea of "group position," which suggests that racial prejudice stems from the relative positions groups occupy in a social hierarchy and the competition between them for resources and status. This concept is further elaborated through the notion of "sense of group position," which Blumer posits as a fundamental factor in the formation of racial prejudices, emphasizing how dominant groups perceive threats to their societal status. Blumer's work also delves into the dynamics of "collective behavior," highlighting how societal issues emerge and evolve through the interactions and definitions created by groups in society. This ties closely with his exploration of "symbolic interactionism," a framework that underscores the importance of symbols and meanings in social interactions and how individuals interpret and respond to the actions of others. Another significant term in Blumer's theory is "ontological security," referenced in the context of how white identities, when threatened, can lead to defensive measures to protect their perceived universal group position. This concept is crucial in understanding the psychological underpinnings of prejudice and discrimination. Blumer's emphasis on "social process" as a unifying theme across his work encourages a focus on the activities of people and the dynamic, situational nature of social interactions. This perspective is essential for comprehending the fluidity of social structures and the ongoing negotiation of social positions. Moreover, Blumer's analysis of "civic sociology" and its implications for public policy highlights the challenge of ensuring freedom and equity in a diverse society, stressing the importance of a public philosophy that remains sensitive to human life's pluralized and segmented nature. In summary, Blumer's theory introduces critical concepts such as group position, sense of group position, collective behavior, symbolic interactionism, ontological security, and social process, all of which offer profound insights into the mechanisms of social interaction, prejudice, and the construction of social problems.What does socialization have to do with reintegrating child soldiers into society?

Socialization plays a crucial role in the reintegration of child soldiers into society. It involves the process of acquiring knowledge, beliefs, and social skills necessary for integration into a community. Former child soldiers often face challenges due to socialization processes within rebel groups, such as the Lord’s Resistance Army, which can impede their successful return to civilian life. These children may undergo identity transformations as soldiers, affecting their ability to reintegrate into society post-conflict. Additionally, former girl soldiers may experience social exclusion and stigma within their families and communities, hindering their social acceptance and re-inclusion after returning from armed groups. Addressing these socialization challenges is essential to ensure the successful reintegration of child soldiers into society.What is Galtung's concept of violence under Batista pada masa revolusi Cuba?

Johan Galtung's concept of violence includes three dimensions: structural violence, direct violence, and cultural violence. Structural violence refers to the systematic ways in which social structures harm individuals by preventing them from meeting their basic needs. Direct violence involves physical or psychological harm inflicted on individuals. Cultural violence pertains to the normalization and legitimization of violence through cultural means. These concepts are crucial in understanding conflicts, such as the one between the Madura and Malay ethnic groups in Sambas, where violence emerged as a result of cultural, religious, and ideological elements. Galtung's comprehensive view of violence extends to gender-based violence as well, highlighting how societal structures and cultural norms perpetuate violence against women, ultimately emphasizing the need for gender equality in the pursuit of peace.What actions connect people with eachother in a new group?

Joint actions and group agency play crucial roles in connecting individuals within a new group. The formation of a new group to address social issues involves processes of small group interaction, where focused discussions can enhance commitment to collective action, belief in its efficacy, and social identification among members. Additionally, technology, such as telephone conference calls and computer-mediated platforms, has been utilized to connect individuals in groups, overcoming barriers like distance, transportation issues, and stigma. Furthermore, the concept of partial connections on manifolds with nonfree group actions has been introduced, highlighting how moving frames determine connection forms and properties of curvature in such settings. These various actions and approaches facilitate the connection and collaboration of individuals within new groups.How do different generations perceive the social value of brands?

Different generations perceive the social value of brands differently. Younger consumers tend to place more importance on self-identity and hedonic value when evaluating luxury brands, while older generations prioritize functional and social values in their purchase intentions. Millennials show a favorable response to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, particularly those motivated by horizontal individualism values, such as freedom and uniqueness, compared to Generation X and baby boomers. Additionally, gender plays a significant moderating role in the perception of corporate social responsibility, with males valuing CSR higher than females, while age (generation) is a defining factor where the older generation values CSR more than younger individuals. These findings highlight the importance of understanding generational differences in perceiving the social value of brands.How does self woth and identity in academic pressure?

Self-worth and identity in academic pressure are intricately linked phenomena influenced by various factors. The academic environment, characterized by evaluative pressures and group identification, plays a significant role in shaping individuals' self-interest orientations, competitive attitudes, and cynical perceptions. Additionally, the professional identity of student teachers has been found to impact anxiety levels, with campus pressure moderating this relationship. Changes in higher education institutions due to policy shifts can create tension between academics' perceived professional identity and organizational expectations, leading to a need for individuals to manage their evolving identities. Moreover, marketization trends in higher education can exacerbate precarity among academics, affecting career paths and individual agency in response to performance incentives and punishments. These factors collectively influence self-worth and identity within the academic realm.