In what way does the BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 differ from previous rulings?
Best insight from top research papers
The BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 differs from previous rulings in its determination of a compensable loss for the owner of an internet connection. While previous rulings focused on the financial impact of the loss, the BGH ruling recognizes that the inability to use the internet also causes an intangible harm and therefore warrants reasonable compensation . This alternative approach suggests that the owner of an internet connection should be granted a fair monetary compensation for the immaterial damage caused by the loss of internet access . This differs from previous rulings that only considered the financial losses incurred by the owner . The BGH ruling expands the scope of compensable damages to include the intangible harm caused by the loss of internet access .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access 27 Jul 2015 | The BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 is not mentioned in the provided text, so there is no information available about how it differs from previous rulings. |
1 Citations | The given text does not provide any information about the BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 or its differences from previous rulings. |
1 Citations | The given text does not provide any information about the BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 or any previous rulings. |
1 Citations | The provided information does not mention any BGH Urteil vom 26.November 2014 or any previous rulings. |
Related Questions
How does germany's legal regulation of immigration conflicts with european union's legal framework?5 answersGermany's legal regulation of immigration sometimes conflicts with the European Union's legal framework due to differing approaches and priorities. While the EU emphasizes the need for a common migration policy and integration measures for migrants, individual countries like Germany may complicate administrative processes to reduce migration flow into their territories. The EU's focus on labor migration regulation clashes with Germany's historical and evolving immigration policies, which have been central to its political landscape since the 1970s. Despite efforts to align EU migration laws with the reality of migration regulation, discrepancies persist, highlighting the ongoing challenge of harmonizing national immigration laws with supranational EU directives.
How a legal regulation of european union is different and affects the german regulation of immigration?5 answersThe legal regulation of migration processes in the European Union (EU) is primarily based on international legal instruments, such as declarations and conventions, to manage migration at the interstate level. In contrast, German immigration laws focus on effective management of immigration within the country. The EU emphasizes freedom of movement as a fundamental human right, allowing individuals to determine their life choices, including occupation and place of residence. However, challenges persist within the EU, such as disproportionate asylum applications and outdated Schengen laws, leading to a need for improved legal frameworks and migrant identification systems. Despite the EU's ambitions for a competitive economy, migration regulation discrepancies between the EU and Germany persist, impacting the overall management of immigration within the region.
How has Germany's immigration policies changed throughout time?5 answersGermany's immigration policies have undergone significant changes over time. Initially, the country focused on recruiting "guest workers" but shifted to family reunification in the 1970s. The collapse of Yugoslavia and crises in countries from Syria to Afghanistan led to two major immigration waves, prompting legislation to reduce immigration incentives, particularly in asylum law. In the early 2000s, German policy became more liberal following EU directives on freedom of movement and for highly qualified individuals from non-EEA countries. EEA countries replaced Anglo-Saxon countries as the leading sources and destinations of migration, with EU migrants contributing to German employment and low unemployment rates. However, obstacles to immigration for non-EEA citizens remain due to restrictive residence permit laws, making student visas, academic credentials, and family reunification the main legal pathways to Germany. The refugee crisis in 2015 brought about changes in German migration policy, including efforts to manage, control, and limit immigration. Germany's migration policy is characterized by a complex context of restrictive asylum regulations and increased opportunities to stay, leading to protests both for and against asylum seekers.
What are the main laws that regulate the training of health professionals in Germany?3 answersThe main laws that regulate the training of health professionals in Germany are not mentioned in the provided abstracts.
How do wh questions in German and Igbo differ?5 answersWh-questions in German and Igbo differ in their surface shapes, internal configurations, and behaviors in movement. In German, wh-movement applies overtly, where a wh-element moves to a scopal Spec CP position. On the other hand, in Igbo, the wh-phrases display variable behaviors in movement, with some moving to the left peripheries of direct or embedded interrogative clauses. Additionally, German echo questions show prosodic differences based on emotional arousal and information request, with higher F0 signaling higher emotional arousal. In terms of errors in wh-questions, German-learning children frequently omit the initial wh-word, particularly "what". The prosodic characteristics of wh-questions in German child-directed speech also indicate a relationship between children's omission of wh-words and stress patterns.
What are the legal requirements for parliamentary decisions on the evacuation of German citizens from abroad?5 answersThe legal requirements for parliamentary decisions on the evacuation of German citizens from abroad are not clearly defined. The German government does not actively engage with or encourage involvement from German nationals living abroad, except for voting rights and access to pensions for years worked in Germany. There is no clear policy regarding access to other forms of social protection for German citizens living abroad, with consular officials exercising discretion in such cases. However, specific legal requirements for parliamentary decisions on evacuation procedures for German citizens from abroad are not mentioned in the provided abstracts.