Search or ask a question

Is 20 participants in learning web development sufficient?

Heuristic evaluation

Usability inspection

Usability goals

Web development

Usability engineering

Best insight from top research papers

Based on the research findings, the adequacy of 20 participants in learning web development can vary depending on the specific usability evaluation method employed. While there is no fixed number of participants to identify all usability issues, the rule of 16 users is considered valid in user testing . In contrast, three evaluators are adequate to uncover 91% of usability problems in the Domain Specific-to-context Inspection (DSI) method . Additionally, a study introducing a system that learns participants of given scripts outperformed baselines, showcasing the significance of participant selection in web experiments . Therefore, when considering the effectiveness of participant numbers in web development learning, it is essential to account for the specific evaluation method and the nature of the study to ensure comprehensive insights and reliable outcomes.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Book Learn Java for Web Development: Modern Java Web Development Vishal Layka 12 Feb 2014 1 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.
Open access Development of Web-Based Differential Equation Learning Media Novi Prayekti 01 Sep 2020	Not addressed in the paper.
Proceedings Article•DOI How many participants are really enough for usability studies Roobaea Alroobaea, Pam J. Mayhew - Show less +1 more 09 Oct 2014 92 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.
Journal Article•DOI How Many Participants: A Simple Means for Concurrent Monitoring H. Karris, H.J. Arisz - Show less +1 more 01 Jul 2000 10 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.
Open access•Proceedings Article Learning Script Participants from Unlabeled Data Michaela Regneri, Alexander Koller, Josef Ruppenhofer, Manfred Pinkal - Show less +3 more 01 Sep 2011 18 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.

My columns

Related Questions

How many participants needed to generate a theme?4 answersTo generate a theme, the number of participants required varies depending on the context. In the study by Best et al., Participatory Theme Elicitation (PTE) involves multiple participants independently identifying themes in the data, suggesting a collaborative approach. On the other hand, McCullick's research on physical educators found that themes were drawn from interviews with 18 practicing teachers, indicating a smaller participant group for theme generation. The method proposed by Zhao et al. involves determining crowd distribution characteristics corresponding to labels to generate themes, emphasizing the importance of understanding participant characteristics. Therefore, the number of participants needed to generate a theme can range from a few individuals in focused studies to a larger group in participatory approaches, highlighting the flexibility in participant requirements for theme generation.

How many participants for pilot study?4 answersA pilot study typically requires a specific number of participants to identify unforeseen problems. One paper suggests that a pilot study including 59 participants is needed to identify problems with a 5% probability in potential study participants ^[Viechtbauer et al.]. However, the other abstracts do not provide a specific number of participants for a pilot study.

How many participants are suggested for pilot study?4 answersTypical sample sizes for pilot studies range from 5 to 20 participants, but these sizes are often too small to provide sufficient precision in the results. Researchers should be aware that these typical sizes result in very small precision and may not be adequate for pilot studies. It is recommended to design the sample size of a pilot study according to the desired precision for determining unknown parameters. For example, a pilot study estimating the standard deviation of a population, its mean, the probability of a certain event, the correlation between variables, or the survival time before an event occurs should have a larger sample size to achieve sufficient precision. The recommended sample size for an external pilot study estimating the standard deviation for a continuous outcome is at least 70 participants, while a sample size of 60 to 100 participants may be required for estimating event rates in a binary outcome.

How many participants is for a survey research?4 answersThe appropriate sample size for a survey research using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) can range from a few experts to hundreds of interviewed people. The specific number of participants required for a survey research depends on various factors such as the research objectives, population size, desired level of precision, and statistical analysis techniques used. It is important to determine a sample size that is representative of the population being studied in order to obtain reliable and valid results. However, the abstracts provided do not mention a specific number of participants for any survey research. Therefore, the appropriate sample size for a survey research cannot be determined solely based on the information provided in the abstracts.

How many student participants were used in virtual reality phobia?5 answersA total of 481 student participants were used in virtual reality phobia studies.

What is the ideal number of participants in a focus group to validate data?5 answersThe ideal number of participants in a focus group to validate data can vary depending on the research project and its specific requirements. However, it is generally recommended that a focus group discussion should comprise between six and ten participants, with an average of eight. This range allows for a diversity of perspectives and ensures that there is enough interaction and discussion among participants to generate rich and varied data. The goal of a focus group is not necessarily to produce consensus, but to stimulate thinking and obtain a range of ideas, opinions, and explanations of experiences. It is important to carefully consider the number of focus groups to conduct, as it will directly influence the volume of data generated and the complexity of the data analysis. Ultimately, the number of participants should be balanced with the resources available and the information necessary to adequately address the research question.

See what other people are reading

How to design a system to obtain user feedbacks and improve an application/software?

To design a system for obtaining user feedback and enhancing an application/software, a user-centered approach is crucial. Incorporating GUI operations for evaluationand creating feedback systems that foster creativityare effective strategies. Utilizing feedback loops between designers and users, including quantitative data, is essential. Implementing a system that provides immediate feedback signals to users during physical activities can also enhance user experience. By allowing evaluators to directly edit web pages and provide feedback, identifying issues that traditional questionnaires may miss becomes possible, leading to more efficient improvement plans. Moreover, involving users in the feedback process through prototypes and evaluations can result in valuable insights for creating a more user-centered application.Success of a vehicle: performance or aesthetics?

The success of a vehicle is influenced by both performance and aesthetics. Aesthetics play a crucial role in a vehicle's desirability and commercial success, impacting brand perception and consumer response. However, achieving superior aesthetics while considering factors like sustainability and cost is a challenge, as seen in the development of mold in color material to eliminate the energy-intensive painting process. On the other hand, performance factors such as safety, handling, and aerodynamics are essential engineering measures that contribute to the overall success of a vehicle. Studies on in-vehicle electronic navigation maps also highlight the importance of aesthetics in usability, showing a connection between perceived aesthetics and usability. Therefore, a balance between performance and aesthetics is crucial for the success of a vehicle.How word of mouth impact on web traffic gain?

Word-of-mouth plays a significant role in driving web traffic gain. Research indicates that on social networking sites like Twitter, users discover web content through word-of-mouth by following URLs shared by friends, leading to wider propagation trees of information. Additionally, positive word-of-mouth can be influenced by consumers' need for uniqueness, where those avoiding similarity may engage less in positive WOM. Furthermore, the value of online reviews is affected by temporal contiguity cues, with positive reviews gaining more value when these cues are present, ultimately impacting consumer choices and product diffusion. Overall, word-of-mouth, influenced by various factors like social connections and review attributes, plays a crucial role in shaping web traffic gain by influencing user behavior and content dissemination.Is ASP.NET the most modern .NET web-framework?

ASP.NET is a modern .NET web framework, but not the only one. The .NET ecosystem has evolved over the years, with the original .NET Framework transitioning into newer frameworks like .NET Core and the latest unified .NET version, which includes ASP.NET Core 6. Various modern web frameworks like Angular, React, Vue, Svelte, and Blazor have emerged, each with unique features and performance characteristics for web application development. Security is a crucial aspect for modern web applications, and frameworks like ASP.NET Core provide built-in security features to protect against common vulnerabilities like SQL injections and cross-site scripting. When developing ASP.NET applications, developers can choose between languages like C# and VB, both of which are powerful and commonly used for web development.How does the implementation of low-code development platforms impact the need for adaptive IT governance frameworks?

The implementation of Low-Code Development Platforms (LCDPs) has a significant impact on the need for adaptive IT governance frameworks. LCDPs enable rapid application development by allowing non-professional developers to create applications, addressing the shortage of software developers and bridging the gap between business requirements and implementation. Organizations adopting LCDPs face challenges such as ensuring strategic conformance with applications in terms of interoperability, scalability, security, and vendor lock-in, which can be managed through Enterprise Architecture frameworks like the Adaptive Integrated Digital Architecture Framework (AIDAF). Additionally, research emphasizes the importance of considering usability factors in low-code tools to enhance user experience and accelerate process automation, highlighting the need for adaptive IT governance frameworks to support these initiatives.Will ai replace developers?

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in software development, particularly through tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, shows promise in enhancing developer productivity and aiding in tasks like program generation and pipeline development. While AI tools can significantly expedite certain programming tasks, they are currently seen as complementary to developers rather than outright replacements. Developers are expected to adapt their skills to leverage AI tools effectively within their workflows. Studies have shown that AI can assist developers in tasks like discovering new operators and improving iterative composition, highlighting the benefits of combining AI with low-code programming for enhanced productivity and efficiency. Therefore, rather than replacing developers, AI is poised to augment their capabilities and streamline certain aspects of the development process.What are some common usability testing methods for virtual environment interfaces?

Usability testing methods for virtual environment interfaces are diverse and tailored to address the unique challenges and opportunities presented by these immersive systems. A systematic mapping study identified interviews, heuristic evaluation, surveys, usability experiments, and expert evaluation as main techniques for usability evaluation in virtual environments. These methods are often used in combination to provide a comprehensive understanding of user experience and interface usability. Heuristic evaluation, a qualitative method, is widely recognized for its effectiveness in usability testing, alongside other methods like cognitive walkthrough and collaborative testing, which offer a deeper insight into the user's interaction with the interface. In the specific context of virtual reality systems used for physical therapy, usability analysis employs 37 heuristics focused on virtual immersion environments, complemented by playability tests and post-test interviews. This approach aims to design systems that mitigate the negative effects associated with virtual reality use, such as physical discomfort, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy. The development of virtual reality devices and applications also necessitates the observation of verbal and nonverbal behaviors during usability testing, requiring ergonomists to use specialized equipment for data recording and monitoring. Usability engineering methods adapted from GUI development, such as user task analysis and formative usability evaluation, have been successfully applied to virtual environment (VE) development. These methods support focused design, measurement, management, and assessment techniques, offering insights from the usability engineering of various VEs. A comparative study measured user performance and preferences between immersive stereoscopic environments and traditional CAD interfaces, highlighting the benefits of natural interfaces like wand interfaces for interaction within virtual environments. An innovative approach to VR usability evaluation involves automated analysis of actual usage recordings to identify usability issues without predefined tasks or fixed test settings, demonstrating the capability to detect a range of usability problems. Studies comparing object selection techniques in virtual environments have provided insights into task performance, reaction time, and accuracy, informing the application of bare-hand interaction in VR. Lastly, the usability of pointing in virtual environments, an essential feature of interaction, has been examined through the lens of Fitts's law, considering factors like target distance, width, environment density, and occlusion.What increases the user interaction within a mobile application?

User interaction within a mobile application can be enhanced through various means. One significant factor is the utilization of mobile devices to improve user experience by separating the display from the controller side, as demonstrated in a system architecture based on a Bluetooth peer-to-peer model. Additionally, the adoption of standardization in user interface and interaction development, facilitated by Application Programming Interface (API) standards, plays a crucial role in connecting software to silicon and accelerating media, ultimately contributing to improved user interaction and experience. Furthermore, the integration of multimodal adaptation for both input and output modality interaction can significantly enhance user interaction within a mobile application, catering to user needs and preferences. These approaches collectively contribute to increasing user interaction and improving the overall user experience in mobile applications.What are the best practices for designing interactive and intuitive e-learning interfaces?

The best practices for designing interactive and intuitive e-learning interfaces involve emphasizing effective design elements such as interface design, content design, and interaction design. User-centered design (UCD) methods, including questionnaires, interviews, high-fidelity prototyping, and usability testing, are crucial for developing e-learning systems with excellent usability. Attention-aware and unobtrusive interfaces can maintain the natural beauty and recreational characteristics of public places while providing valuable information to visitors. Human-centered design approaches, such as the ISO 9241-210:2010 methodology and Google Design Sprint, are essential for creating interfaces that are easy to use, easy to learn, and satisfying for users in the e-learning environment. Intuitive interaction in e-learning interfaces is based on past experiences with similar products, and principles and tools have been developed to assist designers in making interfaces more intuitive.What are the current status and trends of Open data research?

The current status and trends in open data research highlight a multifaceted exploration into the generation of sustainable value, the tension between transparency and datification, and the legal and ethical considerations of data collection and usage. Open government information systems (IS) are being theorized using Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS), revealing a non-linear and unavoidable tension between transparency and the datification effects of open data, particularly in the context of education and public services in Australia. This tension underscores the complexity of managing open data initiatives, which are driven by the promise of generating unprecedented value from underutilized resources. Research supports the notion that open data can foster sustainable value through mechanisms that enhance transparency, decision-making, and market efficiency. Legal and ethical considerations are also paramount, as the increasing practice of accessing commercial websites for research data raises questions about appropriateness and legality. This necessitates a sensitive approach to obtaining consent and promoting open and acceptable research practices. The discourse extends to the realm of net neutrality and data neutrality, suggesting a broader debate on the control and accessibility of online data, which is central to information systems research and the global economy. Innovative methods are being developed to infer demand from available data, such as sales rankings in online retail, demonstrating the practical applications and challenges of working with open data. The conversation around open data is further enriched by advancements in conversational search and information retrieval systems, which aim to enhance human-machine interactions through mixed-initiative interactions and context-enhanced question generation. The exploration of open innovation (OI) behaviors and the motivations behind individual participation in OI activities provide insights into the design and viability of OI platforms. Meanwhile, the concept of digitally connected enterprises emphasizes the importance of open and scalable information supply chains for collaboration and innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Although one context provided does not contain relevant information to directly contribute to the discussion on open data research trends, the collective insights from the other contexts illustrate a dynamic field of study focused on leveraging open data for societal benefit, enhancing transparency, and navigating the complex legal and ethical landscape of data usage.What kind of evaluation consist 3-4 evaluators?

Heuristic evaluation (HE) typically involves 3-5 evaluators assessing the usability of a system based on usability guidelines. This method, introduced by Nielsen and Molich, has become popular in human-computer interaction and user experience fields. On the other hand, program evaluation, as discussed in another paper, is essential for assessing program effectiveness and improvement, often utilizing Kirkpatrick's four-level model. This model, widely used for over six decades, covers aspects like determining program needs, setting objectives, and evaluating the program. In the realm of evaluation roles, an evaluator can take on various roles such as educator, consultant, facilitator, and counselor to enhance the evaluation process's influence on an organization. These diverse evaluation approaches and models cater to different evaluation needs and objectives in various fields.