Is intrapulmonary percussive ventilation beneficial in mechanically ventilated patients?
Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) has shown benefits in various patient categories. Short cycles of high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) superimposed on mechanical ventilation improved lung aeration and gas exchange in tracheostomized patients . However, a retrospective chart review of burn patients with inhalation injury did not support the use of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) plus HFPV over CMV alone in terms of mortality and complications . In a case study of a cystic fibrosis patient, the use of IPV in physiotherapy treatment reduced the need for hospitalization and improved radiologic features . A prospective study on infants with bronchiolitis found no statistically significant effect of IPV treatment on the course of hospitalization when compared to standard treatment . Lastly, a case report demonstrated the benefit of using Mini-Trach II as an interface for IPV in a mechanically ventilated patient . Overall, the evidence suggests that the benefits of IPV in mechanically ventilated patients may vary depending on the specific patient population and context.
Answers from top 5 papers
Papers (5) | Insight |
---|---|
The provided paper does not directly address the question of whether intrapulmonary percussive ventilation is beneficial in mechanically ventilated patients. | |
The provided paper does not specifically mention intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients. | |
The provided paper does not discuss intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients. | |
The provided paper does not address the use of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients. | |
The provided paper does not mention anything about mechanically ventilated patients. The paper is about the use of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis. |