Is Invitro meat acceptable to consumers?
Best insight from top research papers
In-vitro meat, also known as cultured meat or cell-based meat, has varying levels of acceptance among consumers. Some studies suggest that consumers have concerns about the perceived revulsion, lack of naturalness, taste, uncertainty about environmental benefits, and safety concerns associated with this technology . However, other studies indicate that there is a substantial market for cultured meat in many countries, with consumers identifying animal- and environment-related benefits . Consumer acceptance of in-vitro meat also depends on cultural factors and perceptions of food . For example, in China, emotional resistance and concerns about safety and unnaturalness are barriers to regular consumption, but a significant percentage of respondents are willing to accept it as an alternative to conventional meat . Similarly, in Brazil, while a majority of respondents are willing to try cell-based meat, there is a preference for lower prices and some resistance to labeling it as "meat" . Overall, consumer acceptance of in-vitro meat varies depending on factors such as cultural background, perceptions of food, and specific concerns related to the technology.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
18 Citations | The paper states that 46.6% of the respondents found "cell-based meat" to be promising and acceptable. Therefore, it can be inferred that a significant portion of Brazilian consumers find in vitro meat acceptable. |
128 Citations | The paper provides evidence of a substantial market for cultured meat, suggesting that there is consumer acceptance of in vitro meat. |
20 Jun 2018 11 Citations | The paper states that consumers tend to highly reject in-vitro meat technology, with differences in acceptance based on the different names used to describe it. |
44 Citations | The paper discusses Chinese consumers' attitudes towards artificial meat, but it does not specifically mention "in vitro meat" or provide information on its acceptability to consumers. |
Related Questions
How do consumer view high sodium processed meat?4 answersConsumers view high sodium processed meat with increasing concern due to health risks associated with excessive salt intake. While salt is essential for meat quality, its negative impact on cardiovascular health has led to demands for reduced sodium levels in processed meats. Consumers express interest in healthier reformulations of processed meats, focusing on reducing salt and fat content, and enriching products with healthy ingredients. Strategies to improve the healthiness of processed meat include using better quality meat, less salt, fat, preservatives, and additives. Although complete salt removal is challenging, technologies like salt substitutes and processing methods can help reduce sodium content while maintaining product quality. The consumer shift towards naturalness and wellness in meat products highlights the need for the meat processing sector to adapt to changing preferences.
What are the biological hazards associated with the consumption of meat products?4 answersBiological hazards associated with the consumption of meat products include bacteria, parasites, viruses, and fungi. These pathogens can contaminate meat during processing or preparation operations, posing a risk to meat consumers. Common bacterial pathogens found in meat include Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, and Staphylococcus aureus. Parasites such as Taenia saginata and Taenia solium can also be present in meat products. Viruses like Hepatitis A virus, Hepatitis E virus, Rotavirus, Norovirus, and Sapovirus have been associated with meat consumption. These biological hazards can cause a variety of diseases, including gastrointestinal ailments, and can have severe consequences for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women. Controlling these hazards requires intervention at various stages of meat production, processing, transportation, and food preparation.
What are the disadvantages of the marketing restrictions on unhealthy food products?4 answersRestricting the marketing of unhealthy food products to children has some disadvantages. One disadvantage is that children's overall exposure to unhealthy food advertising may not be significantly reduced by these regulations, as children's viewership rates are high outside of designated programming. Another disadvantage is that obesity rates vary dramatically from country to country, suggesting that deeply ingrained dietary traditions may play a larger role in obesity than food marketing practices. Additionally, restrictive marketing regulations may not produce the changes in eating and activity habits that are needed to solve the obesity problem. Finally, there is a contrast between the structuralist discourse that supports marketing restrictions and the individualist discourse that places responsibility on consumers, favoring individual choices over government interventions.
What are the ethical concerns related to the consumption of lab-grown meat?5 answersEthical concerns related to the consumption of lab-grown meat include questions about the intervention in nature and the acceptability of genetic engineering. These concerns arise from the use of animal cells and the potential use of non-meat cells in the production of lab-grown meat. There are also questions about the religious acceptability of lab-grown meat, such as whether it is kosher or halal. Additionally, the use of new food technologies, including lab-grown meat, raises broader ethical questions about the manipulation of nature and the acceptability of such interventions. These ethical concerns highlight the need for careful consideration and discussion around the production and consumption of lab-grown meat.
What are the food preferences of Filipinos in terms of meat?4 answersFilipinos have different food preferences when it comes to meat. In terms of beef, the ideal color for fresh beef is cherry red. For fresh pork, the ideal color is reddish pink. These color preferences are important because color can affect the safety of the meat when consumed. Additionally, a study found that Filipino adults have a dietary pattern that includes meat and beverages. This pattern was associated with a higher risk of overweight/obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol, and high triglycerides. On the other hand, another dietary pattern that includes fruits, vegetables, and snacks was associated with a lower risk of overweight/obesity, diabetes, high triglycerides, and hypertension. These findings suggest that food preferences for meat among Filipinos can have implications for their overall health and risk of non-communicable diseases.
How are plant-based meat alternatives perceived by consumers?1 answersPlant-based meat alternatives are generally perceived as healthier than traditional meat products by consumers. However, there is a discrepancy between consumer perceptions and the actual nutritional content of these alternatives. Consumers tend to overestimate the protein content of plant-based meat alternatives, especially when they carry a "high in protein" claim. Additionally, consumers believe that plant-based meat alternatives are substantially healthier and decrease disease risk compared to traditional meat, which is not always true. Despite these misconceptions, consumers do recognize the environmental benefits of plant-based meat alternatives and consider them to be more environmentally friendly. Overall, there is a need for a fair and transparent environment to provide accurate information about the healthiness and nutritional content of meat and meat alternatives to conscious consumers.