Is there a difference in prognosis between open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release?
Best insight from top research papers
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) show comparable effectiveness in treating carpal tunnel syndrome, with no significant differences in long-term outcomes. ECTR is associated with a higher risk of transient nerve injury, while OCTR has a higher likelihood of wound and scar complications. Studies comparing the two techniques have shown that apart from postoperative pain, outcomes such as handgrip strength improvement and sick leave days are similar between ECTR and OCTR. Additionally, ECTR may lead to increased direct costs but is linked to an earlier return to work. Therefore, both ECTR and OCTR are considered safe and effective approaches, with similar overall prognoses, making the choice between the two techniques dependent on specific patient factors and surgeon expertise.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
4 Citations | Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) shows no difference in long-term outcomes compared to open release, making both techniques equally effective in alleviating carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. |
| Both open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release methods show similar prognosis in handgrip strength improvement and sick leave days, with endoscopic release resulting in less post-op pain. | |
1 Citations | Both open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release methods show similar prognosis in handgrip strength improvement and sick leave days, with endoscopic release resulting in significantly less post-op pain. |
3 Citations | Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) shows no difference in long-term outcomes compared to open release, making both techniques equally effective in alleviating carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. |
| Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What is cost burden of carpal tunnel release and why these studies are important in the future?4 answersThe cost burden of carpal tunnel release (CTR) is significant, with over 500,000 procedures costing over $2 billion annually in the United States alone. Studies have shown that the preoperative workup and nonsurgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can average $858.74 per patient, with electrodiagnostic testing and office visits being the major cost drivers. Despite the high prevalence of CTS in the Medicare patient population and its associated economic burden, surgical management of CTS, including both endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release, has been shown to yield substantial economic benefits, potentially saving between $780 million and $1.6 billion annually.
The importance of these studies lies in their ability to inform future healthcare policy and clinical practice. By identifying the cost-effectiveness of different surgical techniques and settings, such as the lower costs associated with performing open carpal tunnel release in a clinic setting under local anesthesia, healthcare providers can make informed decisions that optimize value delivery. For instance, endoscopic CTR, despite being more expensive than open CTR, offers benefits that may justify its cost in certain contexts. Moreover, the use of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to characterize procedural costs offers a precise method for identifying and addressing cost drivers.
Furthermore, the shift towards less resource-intensive surgical settings and anesthesia methods, such as the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique, demonstrates potential for significant cost savings and reduced use of healthcare resources. These studies underscore the need for ongoing evaluation of CTS management strategies to ensure they are both cost-effective and aligned with patient outcomes, thereby supporting efforts to improve value in healthcare delivery. The economic and social burdens of CTS, as highlighted by the significant costs borne by specific worker populations, further emphasize the importance of these studies in guiding future health policy and clinical interventions to mitigate the impact of this prevalent condition.
Does thenar atrophy have a worse prognosis after carpal tunnel surgery?5 answersThenar atrophy following carpal tunnel surgery does not necessarily indicate a worse prognosis. Research indicates that patients with thenar atrophy may experience increased grip and pinch strength by the sixth month post-surgery, showing significant improvements in muscle function. Additionally, late neurorrhaphy and hypothenar fat pad flap procedures have been successful in restoring nerve conduction and muscle function after accidental transection of the thenar branch of the median nerve during surgery, leading to improved daily functioning and muscle strength over time. Furthermore, the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome can be estimated by assessing thenar muscle atrophy, which reflects electrodiagnostic results but does not necessarily impact patient-based assessments. Therefore, while thenar atrophy is a concern, appropriate interventions and post-operative care can lead to positive outcomes.
What is the incidence in carpal tunnel syndrome?5 answersThe incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) varies depending on the population studied. In women, the incidence of CTS ranges from 0.7% to 9.2%, while in men it ranges from 0.4% to 2.1%. The incidence of CTS is 3 times higher in women compared to men. Pregnant women have a higher risk of developing CTS, with a 2-3 times higher incidence compared to non-pregnant women. The incidence of CTS after trigger finger (TF) surgery is 1.1 per 1000 person-years. Risk factors for CTS include age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, and chronic renal failure. Middle age, female sex, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, and Raynaud's syndrome are also identified as risk factors for CTS. Distal radius fractures severe enough to require surgical fixation are associated with a higher incidence of CTS.
What is the epidemiology of carpal tunnel syndrome?4 answersCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition characterized by compression of the median nerve at the wrist. The prevalence of CTS ranges from 3.1% to 10.8% depending on the population studied. Risk factors for CTS include age, sex, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and inflammatory conditions. Women are more likely to develop CTS than men, with a female:male ratio of approximately 2:1. Obesity, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism are systemic diseases that have been associated with an increased risk of CTS. The association between CTS and these diseases is partially mediated by raised body mass index (BMI). Occupational factors, such as repetitive hand movements and vibration exposure, also contribute to the development of CTS. Early intervention and occupational therapy can help manage CTS and facilitate a return to work activities.
What are the advantages of minimally invasive surgery over open surgery in terms of patient recovery?4 answersMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers several advantages over open surgery in terms of patient recovery. MIS techniques, such as thoracoscopic spine surgery, have been shown to significantly reduce tissue trauma, resulting in shorter hospital stays and faster postoperative recovery. Compared to traditional open surgery, MIS for colorectal tumor has the benefits of less trauma, more delicate operation, and faster postoperative recovery. In the case of endometrioid endometrial cancer, MIS has been found to have superior outcomes in terms of overall morbidity, blood loss, post-surgical recovery, and postoperative complications. For T4 colorectal cancer, MIS has shown similar oncological outcomes to open surgery, with the potential for reduced invasiveness and enhanced recovery. These advantages of MIS contribute to improved patient outcomes and a faster return to normal activities.
Hi can you look for poor prognostic factors for carpal tunnel syndrome?5 answersPoor prognostic factors for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) include longer symptom duration, a positive Phalen's test, and thenar wasting. Other factors that have been associated with a negative outcome of conservative management for CTS include occupational repetition, lack of vigorous exercise, physical activities with wrist strain, poorer physical health, lower job satisfaction, and obesity. Additionally, certain co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypothyroidism have been identified as risk factors for CTS. It is important to note that the results should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the risks of bias identified.