Meta analyses of surgical technique types for implant placement in patients with periodontitis?
The management of periodontally compromised patients through implant placement involves various surgical techniques, each with its own set of outcomes and efficacy levels. A systematic review by Sarafidou et al. highlighted the high survival rates of implants in periodontally compromised teeth, suggesting that both tooth preservation and extraction followed by implant placement are viable options, with bone regeneration techniques improving long-term prognosis . Wijesundara et al. evaluated the effect of surgical treatments on peri-implantitis, finding significant reductions in probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) after surgical intervention, although no significant variation was observed among different surgical methods . Araujo-Corchado and Pardal-Peláez discussed the precision of implant placement, indicating that guided surgery techniques, both static and dynamic, offer more accurate implant positioning compared to freehand placement, which could be beneficial for patients with periodontitis to ensure optimal implant placement . Turkyilmaz et al. compared flapless and traditional flap approaches for implant placement, finding similar survival rates but slightly better marginal bone levels (MBLs) with the flap approach, suggesting a nuanced choice of technique based on patient-specific periodontal conditions . Chen et al. compared different surgical methods for peri-implantitis, finding augmentative therapy (AT) superior in improving radiographic bone fill (RBF) and clinical attachment level (CAL) compared to open flap debridement (OFD), which could influence the choice of surgical technique in periodontally compromised patients . Sousa et al. and Veitz-Keenan et al. both reported higher biological complications and lower success rates of implants in patients with treated periodontitis, emphasizing the need for careful surgical planning and technique selection in this patient group . Saade et al. proposed a technique to improve esthetic outcomes through periodontal flaps with subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) for root coverage or periodontal procedures prior to implant placement, suggesting a pre-implantation surgical intervention to enhance outcomes . Lanza et al. and Thakral et al. described case studies where implant placement timing and technique were critical for achieving successful outcomes in periodontally compromised patients, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment planning and the potential for immediate implant placement with proper management . In summary, the choice of surgical technique for implant placement in patients with periodontitis should be tailored to individual patient needs, considering the precision of implant placement, the potential for bone and soft tissue regeneration, and the specific challenges posed by the patient's periodontal status. The evidence suggests a range of surgical options, from guided surgery to flapless versus traditional flap approaches, and augmentative therapies, each with its own advantages and limitations in the context of periodontitis.
Answers from top 8 papers
Papers (8) | Insight |
---|---|
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Augmentative therapy (AT) showed superior outcomes in radiographic bone fill and clinical attachment level compared to open flap debridement (OFD) for peri-implantitis in patients. | |
87 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Not addressed in the paper. | |
Not addressed in the paper. |