scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What are some common challenges and best practices for implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks? 


Best insight from top research papers

Implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks can pose several challenges. One common challenge is the need for efficient network resource allocation to support diverse quality of service (QoS) requirements and heterogeneous communication protocols . Another challenge is the complexity of the network, which requires careful consideration of the characteristics of time-sensitive networking (TSN) and the limitations of network function virtualization (NFV) . Best practices for addressing these challenges include developing service function chain (SFC) driven queue injection schemes, which model virtual network functions (VNFs) and TSN multi-queue characteristics to transform the problem into a shortest path routing problem . Additionally, considering the QoS requirements of applications and implementing a TSN queue-based topology division mechanism can further simplify the augmented topology and improve algorithm efficiency .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The provided paper does not mention any challenges or best practices for implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks.
The provided paper does not discuss the challenges and best practices for implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks.
The provided paper is about a service function chain (SFC) driven queue injection scheme in a network function virtualization (NFV)-enabled time-sensitive networking (TSN) network. It does not discuss the challenges and best practices for implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks.
The provided paper is about a service function chain (SFC) driven queue injection scheme in a network function virtualization (NFV)-enabled time-sensitive networking (TSN) network. It does not discuss the challenges and best practices for implementing SVI for inter-VLAN routing in large-scale networks.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Erina Takeshita, Naoki Wakamiya 
01 Aug 2015
1 Citations
The provided paper is about adaptive multipath routing for large-scale layered networks. It does not discuss SVI for inter-VLAN routing or any challenges and best practices related to it.

Related Questions

What are the challenges in SNARK implementation on IoT?5 answersImplementing SNARK (Succinct Non-interactive Argument of Knowledge) on IoT faces challenges such as data security concerns, the need for efficient power consumption in IoT devices, and the requirement for secure data transmission over long distances. Additionally, the integration of SNARK in IoT systems requires addressing privacy issues in healthcare servicesand overcoming security challenges in digital supply chains, including technological infrastructure limitations and security concerns. These challenges highlight the complexity of ensuring data integrity, privacy, and security in IoT environments when implementing SNARK technology.
What are the potential drawbacks of using cluster-based routing in large-scale sensor networks?4 answersCluster-based routing in large-scale sensor networks can face drawbacks such as uneven distribution of cluster heads, inappropriate selection of cluster heads, and energy inefficiency. These issues can lead to imbalanced energy consumption among nodes, reducing the overall network lifetime and performance. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed enhancements like the LEACH-OptCluster algorithm, which aims to maximize energy efficiency by balancing energy consumption across network nodes. Additionally, the NP-Hard nature of clustering in wireless sensor networks poses a challenge, prompting the use of optimization algorithms like particle swarm optimization (PSO) and firefly algorithms to improve energy-efficient routing and prolong network lifetime. Novel approaches based on neural networks have also been suggested to optimize power consumption and extend the operational lifespan of WSNs.
What are the challenges in implementing a wireless network?4 answersImplementing a wireless network poses several challenges. One major challenge is the issue of security and privacy. Wireless networks are more vulnerable to cyber attacks, making it crucial to address these concerns. Another challenge is the selection of suitable wireless protocols for different aircraft systems. It may be necessary to use multiple technologies as a single protocol may not be suitable for all systems. Additionally, the channel inside an aircraft can vary, and further measurements may be required to establish a generalized channel model. In the context of Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSNs), challenges include communication resource constraints, real-time rescheduling, and differential Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. Overall, the challenges in implementing a wireless network include security and privacy issues, protocol selection for different systems, channel modeling, and addressing specific requirements in various application domains.
What are the challenges of routing for UAV communications?4 answersRouting for UAV communications faces several challenges. Traditional flooding searching algorithms lead to high communication overheads, while greedy searching algorithms pose low routing efficiency. UAV networks have unique characteristics such as varying levels of dynamism, intermittent links, and fluid topology, which are not fully addressed by existing research in mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) and vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs). Moreover, UAVs in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs) need to communicate with each other and ground stations, requiring the selection of effective paths for reliable and stable data transmission. Additionally, the dynamic network topology, high mobility, and resource constraints of UAVs make data forwarding challenging, necessitating the design of efficient routing protocols. These challenges highlight the need for routing algorithms that can adapt to the unique characteristics of UAV communications and ensure efficient and reliable data transmission.
What are the challenges and issues in routing in MANET?4 answersRouting in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) faces several challenges and issues. The frequent mobility of network nodes and the dynamic topology make MANETs vulnerable to security threats, such as open nodes and disconnected links, leading to degraded network performance. The selection of Multipoint Relays (MPR) through flooding mechanism in the OLSR routing protocol has been widely used in MANETs, but there is still room for improvement in terms of routing and security. Machine learning techniques have been explored to enhance existing routing protocols or develop new ones, with a focus on real-time updating of route lists and node classification for optimization of routing processes. Additionally, the movement of nodes in MANETs makes routing demanding, and various performance measures, maximal performances, and attack analysis have been studied to address these challenges.
What are the main challenges for the implementation of the ปรังญา สางขยะ?5 answersThe main challenges for the implementation of the ปรังญา สางขยะ include regulation, management, program design, lack of dedicated staff, less involvement with community people, inadequate program knowledge dissemination, lack of incentives for work, incoordination with regulatory authorities, lack of latest software for monitoring and evaluation, incoordination between employees, transient position of Sajida bondhu, and low payment scale compared to other organizations. Additionally, challenges such as customization of existing technology, integration of various sensors and navigation software, human behavior, traffic management strategies, ethics, liability, and policies also need to be addressed. Other challenges include selection of high-risk individuals, standardization of nodule classification and measurement, specific training of radiologists, optimization of screening intervals and duration, handling of ancillary findings, psychological impact on screened individuals, and the impact of potential false positive findings. Supply-side challenges include staff, material resources, and organizational issues, while demand-side challenges include recruitment and retention of participants, adaptation of material, and perceived privacy.

See what other people are reading

What are the algorithm of Topological Change Adaptive Ad hoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector (TA-AOMD)?
5 answers
Lack of protocols for addressing traffic delays during delivery, is that necessary for the management?
5 answers
Articles related to Vehicle routing problem ?
5 answers
What is sampling procedure ofcareer choices awaits after graduating he strand at arellano university jose rizal campus?
5 answers
What is sampling procedure ofcareer choices awaits after graduating he strand at arellano university jose rizal campus?
5 answers
How the RL framework help solve service overlay planning problem in manet scenarios?
5 answers
The RL framework plays a crucial role in addressing service overlay planning problems in MANET scenarios by optimizing decision-making processes. NeuroPlan, a deep RL approach, utilizes a graph neural network for state encoding and a two-stage hybrid approach to efficiently solve network planning problems. Additionally, the Flexible Routing Decision (FRD) framework proposes a novel routing decision-making process using multiple metric types to support application-level QoS requirements in MANETs. By leveraging RL methods, such as actor-critic reinforcement learning, these frameworks enhance the efficiency of path discovery and routing decisions while considering dynamic network conditions and diverse QoS requirements in MANET environments. This integration of RL techniques in service overlay planning contributes to cost reduction and improved performance in MANET scenarios.
The larger an ant's antennal scape, the better the communication?
5 answers
Ants with larger antennal scapes exhibit significant relationships with certain vision-linked attributes, suggesting a potential link between antennal scape length and communication efficiency. In contrast, differences in body size, possibly linked to walking speed, can impair communication efficiency during tandem running in ants. Larger size differences between tandem leader and follower ants lead to a considerable drop in success rates, highlighting the negative impact of phenotypic variation on communication processes. This indicates that while antennal scape length may play a role in communication efficiency, other factors such as body size matching during interactions can also significantly influence the effectiveness of communication strategies in ant colonies.
Does AVNN from HRV have any other name?
5 answers
AVNN from HRV, which stands for the average of all the NN intervals, is also known as the mean NN. This alternative name for AVNN is derived from a study that aimed to reduce the number of heartbeats required for HRV estimation to enable real-time monitoring. The research proposed a deep learning-based system, specifically a recurrent neural network, for the inference of AVNN and another HRV feature, IHR (instantaneous heart rate), from a shorter ECG interval of about 1 minute. The results indicated that AVNN and IHR can be accurately inferred from this shorter ECG interval, with a mean error of less than 5% of the computed HRV features, showcasing the feasibility of real-time monitoring using these alternative names for HRV parameters.
Why does one hot not good for tree based algorithm?
5 answers
One-hot encoding is not ideal for tree-based algorithms due to the irregular memory access patterns associated with tree structures, making it challenging to accelerate with conventional digital hardware. Tree-based models, while explainable and effective with limited training data, face difficulties in efficient computation and memory access. In contrast, deep learning models excel in accuracy but lack explainability. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed enhanced tree algorithms like ILOF, which utilize tree structures for efficient outlier detection in large-scale datasets. Additionally, advancements in hot-potato routing algorithms aim to optimize routing times on tree topologies by locally making routing decisions to minimize conflicts and improve efficiency.
How does auto discovery work in Data Distribution Service ?
5 answers
Auto discovery in Data Distribution Service (DDS) involves various mechanisms for locating and establishing communication with target systems. DDS typically utilizes node discovery protocols like the Simple Discovery Protocol (SDP). Additionally, the use of advanced machine learning algorithms implemented by profiler components across different data storage systems enables automatic and periodic identification and categorization of data assets for enriching data quality and enabling data discovery. Furthermore, in the context of collaborative distributed networked control systems, the deployment of DDS for data packet exchange has gained traction, with efforts focused on enhancing memory efficiency and packet transmission through novel approaches like Enhanced Threshold Bloom Filters (ETBF). Overall, auto discovery in DDS leverages protocols, algorithms, and innovative techniques to facilitate efficient data exchange and system interoperability.
What is autonomous system and routing computer network?
5 answers
An autonomous system (AS) in computer networking refers to a collection of networks with the same routing policies, each having administrative control over its inter-domain routing policy. These ASs collaborate to enable end-to-end communication in the Internet, with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) facilitating routing information exchange between different ASs. Autonomous networks can also be designed to operate autonomously, where a controller determines routing paths and instructs data packet processors to route packets through switches based on the determined paths. Moreover, advancements in network management involve employing Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to automate operations, enhance decision accuracy, and enable autonomous driving networks. These technologies aim to simplify network deployment, improve adaptability to dynamic demands, and reduce manual errors in network operations.