What are the advantages and disadvantage of harvesters with author and Year above 2014?
Best insight from top research papers
Harvesters with a shock-proof function have the advantages of excellent shock-proof performance, simple operation, high harvesting efficiency, and good harvesting length control. They also have a high degree of lawn management, which is beneficial for the later development of the lawn . Harvesters with a ladder and double headers have the advantages of evenly smashing straw, preventing crushed straw from flying, and providing convenience for land cultivation. They also guarantee high efficiency and uniform crushing of straw cutting, and the ladder can be used for climbing safely and conveniently . The harvester with a drum-type separating and cleaning device has the advantages of a simple structure, small size, low gravity center, reduced crop lifting height and conveying processes, and decreased power consumption . However, the disadvantages of these harvesters are not mentioned in the provided abstracts.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not mention any specific advantages or disadvantages of harvesters with authors and years above 2014. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any advantages or disadvantages of harvesters with authors and year above 2014. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any specific advantages or disadvantages of harvesters with authors and years above 2014. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any specific advantages or disadvantages of harvesters with ladders and double headers. | |
| The provided paper does not mention any specific advantages or disadvantages of harvesters with shock-proof function. |
Related Questions
What is harvesting crops?4 answersHarvesting crops refers to the process of gathering mature crops from the fields. It involves using various apparatus and machines to efficiently collect the crops. The methods and technologies used in crop harvesting have evolved over time to improve efficiency and quality. Different inventions and techniques have been developed to optimize the process. For example, Estwick and Keeling have proposed an apparatus that utilizes sensing means and ground motion sensors to determine the location of crops and harvest them. Lee has developed a crop harvesting apparatus that mechanizes the entire process and ensures high-quality crop collection. Desai, Faivre, Zerillo, Prunty, and Hoeg have designed a plant by plant harvester that can analyze single or double rows of crops and capture data related to the crop at the single plant level. Geary has introduced a method of agricultural harvesting that involves assigning grades to different crop zones based on growth parameters and separating and storing crops accordingly. Yi Lee has developed a harvester specifically for crops under the ground, which includes trench blades and a transfer conveyor for efficient collection.
How to harvest cavies?5 answersCavies, which include guinea pigs, capybaras, maras, and rock cavies, can be harvested by collecting blood for analysis, obtaining bone marrow under general anesthesia, or conducting hematologic studies. However, there is a lack of hematologic studies on cavies that fully comply with reference interval generation guidelines.
Does harvest success impact hunter reqruitment?4 answersHarvest success can impact hunter recruitment. Intense selective harvest of large mammals may lead to an evolutionary shrinkage of their weapons. Changes in weapon size over time may reveal underlying changes in harvest pressure or selectivity. Successful harvesting of deer was significant in predicting satisfaction with deer management among different hunting groups. Harvest success was directly related to satisfaction with management for archery deer hunters. Harvest success was associated with perception of balanced harvest, which was related to satisfaction with deer management for rifle deer hunters. These findings suggest that harvest success can influence hunters' satisfaction with management practices, which in turn can impact their recruitment and participation in hunting activities.
What are some of the most environmentally friendly harvesting methods that do not involve burning?5 answersSome environmentally friendly harvesting methods that do not involve burning include magnetic flocculation, flotation, and proportional threshold harvesting. Magnetic flocculation is a promising method for harvesting microalgae, as it offers simple operation, fast separation, and energy saving. Flotation is another method that shows promise for microalgae harvesting, as it offers better characteristics compared to other methods. Proportional threshold harvesting is a framework that can be used to develop sustainable harvesting strategies in ecosystems with environmental fluctuations. These methods contribute to the sustainable utilization of biological resources and help mitigate the negative impacts of harvesting on the environment.
What is a harvester in forestry?3 answersA harvester in forestry refers to a machine used for the felling and bucking of logs in the logging chain. It is operated by highly qualified specialists known as operators. However, the shortage of skilled operators can disrupt the logging chain processes, leading to additional costs for the company. To address this issue, additional models of working with operators and forest machines are necessary. The harvester typically consists of a feed unit with clamp arms and feed means, a chain saw box with a power chain saw, and a delimbing unit with an angle-shaped upper cutter and side cutters. The delimbing unit can be moved relative to the tree to cut off the limbs when the feeding of the tree is stopped. Forest harvesting operations are complex and affected by various factors, including the nature of the trees, the environment, the operator, and the shift. Poor management of harvest operations can lead to setbacks and delays in the forestry supply chain. Therefore, productivity prediction models are developed to estimate productivity considering all these factors.
How do technological limitations in post-harvest handling and storage contribute to losses and hinder innovation in the agriculture sector?5 answersTechnological limitations in post-harvest handling and storage contribute to losses and hinder innovation in the agriculture sector. Conventional post-harvest methods are inadequate in preventing the loss of agricultural produce, leading to significant post-harvest losses. Poor storage practices, such as the pressure to sell crops immediately after harvest, result in price fluctuations and post-harvest losses. In the case of jute bags used for grain storage, their water-loving nature increases moisture content and fungal growth, reducing seed longevity and viability. Pest infection, weight losses due to climatic conditions, and transportation losses also contribute to post-harvest losses of vegetables. These limitations hinder innovation in the agriculture sector by impeding the development of cost-effective interventions to reduce post-harvest losses and limiting the potential for regional storage and warehouse receipt systems. Integrating blockchain technology into the storage structure can help reduce storage losses and support producer-consumer lines.