Search or ask a question

What are the benefits and limitations of using ResearchGate and Altmetrics for impact measurement?

Complement (music)

Best insight from top research papers

ResearchGate and Altmetrics have several benefits and limitations for impact measurement. Altmetrics, such as social media counts, can reflect the public interest and discussion of scholarly works, providing insights into the immediate impact of a publication beyond traditional bibliometrics . They can complement citation metrics and potentially provide a better picture of overall scientific impact, reducing biases associated with focusing solely on citations . However, altmetrics have limitations, including susceptibility to gaming, data sparsity, and difficulties in translating the evidence into specific types of impact . Additionally, altmetrics may mainly reflect public interest rather than societal impact . On the other hand, ResearchGate allows researchers to share their work, collaborate, and receive feedback, which can enhance the visibility and accessibility of their research . However, ResearchGate's limitations include concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the metrics it provides .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review Iman Tahamtan, Lutz Bornmann - Show less +1 more 28 Jan 2020-Profesional De La Informacion 43 Citations	The provided paper does not mention the benefits and limitations of using ResearchGate and Altmetrics for impact measurement.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators Stacy Konkiel 29 Sep 2020 13 Citations	The paper does not mention the benefits and limitations of using ResearchGate and Altmetrics for impact measurement. The paper discusses the strengths and limitations of altmetrics in general, but does not specifically address ResearchGate or provide information on its benefits or limitations.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI The Pros and Cons of the Use of Altmetrics in Research Assessment Mike Thelwall 12 May 2020 29 Citations	The provided paper does not mention ResearchGate or provide information about its benefits and limitations for impact measurement.
Open access•Proceedings Article•DOI Altmetrics and Citation Counts: An Empirical Analysis of the Computer Science Domain Yusra Shakeel, Rand Alchokr, Jacob Krüger, Thomas Leich, Gunter Saake - Show less +4 more 20 Jun 2022 3 Citations	The provided paper does not mention ResearchGate or discuss the benefits and limitations of using ResearchGate and Altmetrics for impact measurement.
Open access•Proceedings Article•DOI Are Altmetrics Useful for Assessing Scientific Impact?: A Survey Yusra Shakeel, Rand Alchokr, Jacob Krüger, Thomas Leich, Gunter Saake - Show less +4 more 19 Oct 2022	The paper does not specifically mention ResearchGate or discuss the benefits and limitations of using ResearchGate and Altmetrics for impact measurement.

My columns

Related Questions

How to measure social impact?5 answersMeasuring social impact involves evaluating the effects of organizational activities on society. This process requires identifying key intended outcomes, considering various stakeholders, and utilizing different research designs and evidence types. Methods like the Social Return on Investment (SROI) approach can help quantify impacts and demonstrate value to investors and funders. Different conventions, such as the "managerial convention" and the "deliberative convention," influence how social impact is measured, reflecting varying perceptions of what constitutes a good evaluation. Challenges in social impact measurement include limited resources, the need for digital tools, and the increasing demand for proof of impact from stakeholders and funders. Developing open-source tools like the proposed social impact analysis tool can aid in quantifying impacts and addressing current measurement challenges.

What is the significance of altmetrics in measuring the impact of academic research?4 answersAltmetrics are web-based quantitative indicators that supplement traditional citation counts in measuring the impact of academic research. They are based on user interactions on the internet and social media platforms, providing real-time metrics that reflect the outreach of scientific research to both academic and non-academic audiences. Altmetrics have been found to be better indicators of research quality than previously thought, although not as strong as raw and field-normalized citation counts. They can complement traditional metrics by representing the immediate impact of a paper and its impact outside of academia, potentially providing a more comprehensive picture of overall scientific impact. Altmetrics, such as Mendeley reader counts and tweet counts, have been shown to be relatively strong indicators of research quality in many fields, particularly in the health and physical sciences. Altmetrics can also be used to measure serendipity in research discovery, as they capture user interactions and reactions to randomly recommended scientific publications.

What are the different ways to measure research and development?5 answersA wide variety of methodologies exist to measure research and development. These include surveys, statistical and econometric estimations, patent analyses, bibliometrics, scientometrics, network analyses, case studies, and historical tracings. Performance measurements of R&D collaboration are also important, and can be divided into categories such as knowledge, efficiency, resources, markets, and relationships. Additionally, the values of researchers play a role in measuring research and development. Academic research values can be conceptualized through theoretical insights and empirical data, leading to a better understanding of the different values researchers have.

Why measuring the impact of scholarly publications is important?2 answersMeasuring the impact of scholarly publications is important because it allows for the assessment of researchers, institutions, and the advancement of science itself. Common metrics such as citations, journal impact factor, and indices like the H-index are used to capture scientists' contributions to their field. These metrics are used to inform faculty hiring and promotion, rank grant funding applications, and compare researchers' productivity. However, these metrics may not capture the socioeconomic impact of health research and can lead scientists to neglect other important areas. Altmetrics, a nontraditional metric, is being used to assess research impact and measure the visibility, impact, and quality of articles. The use of citation counts to evaluate scientific output has become a tool of scientific policy and is applied in editorial procedures, evaluation of research groups, and the concession of grants and academic positions. Despite criticisms, the assessment of scientific research remains a preoccupation due to the competitive nature of cutting-edge research and the restrictions of metric factors.

How can research impact be measured?5 answersResearch impact can be measured through various methods and tools. One approach is to use common metrics such as citations generated by peer-reviewed publications, journal impact factor, and indices that combine publication and citation count. These metrics are often used by academic scientists and administrators to evaluate researchers' productivity and inform faculty hiring and promotion decisions. Another way to measure research impact is through the assessment of research utilization and engagement. This involves evaluating how research is taken up, used, and reused in policy and practice settings, and linking research processes or outputs to wider changes. The Research Contribution Framework is an empirically grounded framework that can be used to assess the impact of research on policy and practice, taking into account contextual factors that influence research impact. Additionally, there is a need to consider the challenges and consequences of incentivizing and rewarding specific articulations of research impact, and to ensure that the current framework does not favor certain academics and research topics over others.

How can research impact to policy making be measured?5 answersResearch impact on policy making can be measured through various methods. One approach is to use social network analysis and qualitative analysis of interviews to understand the social processes that mediate the generation of impact from research. Another method involves text-mining techniques to identify mentions of research outputs in policy documents, which can help researchers and institutions understand the real-world uses of their work. Additionally, conceptual frameworks can be used to examine the influences on research uptake in specific settings and guide attempts to ensure uptake of research findings. It is important to consider both generic determinants of research impact and the specificities of the policy area being studied. Continued multi-sectoral work and prospective approaches are also needed to better understand and measure research uptake in policy making.

See what other people are reading

How does the level of customer satisfaction vary among different fast food establishments?

Customer satisfaction levels vary among different fast-food establishments based on various factors. Research indicates that in Perlis, Malaysia, the quality of service is the most crucial factor influencing customer satisfaction, followed by food quality, price, and restaurant atmosphere. In Da Nang, Vietnam, service quality, price, and physical environment positively impact customer satisfaction, while food quality does not significantly influence it. Additionally, the study in Jabodetabek highlights that service quality significantly affects customer satisfaction, leading to repeat visits, while product quality alone does not directly impact satisfaction. Overall, factors such as service quality, price, and restaurant atmosphere play significant roles in determining customer satisfaction levels across different fast-food establishments.How comfortable are university students with using websites?

University students generally find websites to be a valuable tool for accessing information and enhancing their educational experience. Studies have shown that students appreciate the ease of obtaining information and interacting with their university through websites. However, the usability and accessibility of university websites can sometimes be lacking, leading to frustration among students. Efforts to improve website usability have been made, such as evaluating and proposing necessary steps to enhance the accessibility of university websites in Africa. Additionally, the effectiveness of online educational interventions, like a website aimed at combating fake news, has been demonstrated in improving students' electronic health literacy levels. Overall, while students benefit from using websites, there is a continuous need to enhance usability and accessibility to ensure a comfortable experience for all users.What are the types of mixed methods researches in education?

Mixed-methods research in education encompasses various types that combine qualitative and quantitative approaches. One type involves preceding randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with formative research and evaluation to assess intervention targeting, feasibility, and acceptability. Another type focuses on integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies to understand teachers' lives, work, and effectiveness, emphasizing the synergy between the two approaches. Additionally, there is a growing recognition of the need for mixed-methods studies in educational psychology due to the complex nature of human behavior and the importance of understanding group differences, facilitated by technological advances and sophisticated statistical tools. Furthermore, mixed methods research is gaining popularity in distance education, offering a methodological approach to address research questions and bridge epistemological gaps in the field.Does social media impact the self-esteem of young women and or men?

Social media significantly impacts the self-esteem of young women and men. Studies show that spending more time on social media platforms intensifies body image disorders, leading to negative upward comparisons and self-dissatisfaction. Additionally, social media use has been linked to increased loneliness and lower self-esteem, with men showing higher levels of loneliness and lower self-esteem compared to women. Furthermore, social networks have a negative impact on body satisfaction and body image, influenced by feedback received and time invested, although the #bodypositive trend is associated with higher psychological well-being and protection against body dissatisfaction. Instagram, a popular social network among young adults, has been associated with risks such as emotional loneliness, displacement of daily activities, and feelings of inferiority, highlighting the need for digital well-being awareness.How does the online language learning process differ from traditional classroom-based methods?

The online language learning process differs from traditional classroom-based methods in various ways. Online learning offers increased flexibility in terms of time, place, and learning pace, making it more interactive and conducive to language instruction. Research indicates that online instruction can lead to faster development of basic conversational competence compared to traditional classroom instruction, as it provides more opportunities for productive conversational use of the target language. Additionally, studies show that e-learning methods are preferred over traditional teaching methods by various user groups, including students, researchers, instructors, and staff, due to the outstanding feedback received. Furthermore, in the context of English language teaching, online learners tend to perform better than traditional classroom learners, although the difference may not be significantly remarkable.What is the best guide to describe narrative studies?

The best guide to describe narrative studies is the book "Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research," which offers a comprehensive understanding of narratives, how to conduct narrative studies, and apply findings to practice. This book provides insights into oral, written, and multimodal narratives, along with research methods for data analysis and reporting in narrative research. Additionally, narrative reviews, a common form of narrative research, offer a subjective examination and critique of literature, allowing for a nuanced description and interpretation of complex topics. By exploring different narrative review types such as state-of-the-art, meta-ethnographic, critical, and theory integration reviews, researchers can deepen their understanding of various methodologies for narrative studies.What is the current public opinion on animal experimentation?

The public opinion on animal experimentation varies across different regions. In Western countries, approximately half of the population supports animal testing for biomedical research purposes, while the other half opposes it. In Spain, a survey revealed that a majority (73.1%) accepted animal research, but certain factors like negative media reports, gender, and non-scientific background influenced a more negative opinion. In Japan, a significant portion of the public (55-62%) acknowledges the necessity of animal experiments for medical advancements, but emotional language can sway opinions towards viewing animal experiments as cruel acts. Across 28 European countries, experimentation on mice is generally accepted, but opinions are divided on using dogs and monkeys, with changing trends observed between 2005 and 2010. These findings highlight the complex and diverse nature of public perceptions regarding animal experimentation.Are consumers scared of additional fees?

Consumers exhibit varying reactions to additional fees based on different contexts. Research suggests that higher fees can lead to lower prices for most customers, benefiting those who do not exploit customer-friendly policies. Furthermore, studies indicate that consumers may not always fully consider or process all price information, potentially underestimating total costs, which can influence their purchasing behavior. In the realm of online services, consumer attitudes towards fee-based services are influenced by perceived value and past expectations of free services, indicating a mixed willingness to pay for online services. Additionally, in the mobile app sector, consumers show less concern about privacy violations when using subscription-based financial services compared to purchase-based models, attributing higher consumer-serving motives to subscription fee-charging developers.What are the primary factors that contribute to the success of a music festival?

The success of a music festival hinges on several key factors. Firstly, the festival program, festival area, accessibility, information, employees and volunteers, souvenirs, convenience, food, and security are crucial aspects in planning and organizing a successful event. Additionally, incorporating elements that enhance the overall guest experience, such as offering activities that create a positive experience, can significantly impact attendee loyalty, word-of-mouth intentions, and sustainability behaviors, ultimately contributing to the festival's success. Moreover, factors like cultural exploration, socialization, trust, brand connection, and the congruence between the sponsoring brand and the festival's characteristics play a mediating role in enhancing the festival's success through sponsorship and branding strategies. Overall, a well-rounded approach that considers both operational and experiential aspects is vital for ensuring the success of a music festival.What is the impact of Korean pop idols' sexualization on adolescent fans' attitudes and behaviors?

The impact of Korean pop idols' sexualization on adolescent fans' attitudes and behaviors is multifaceted. The easy access to information about K-pop idols through technology intensifies adolescent fanaticism, leading to behavioral changes. This fanaticism can manifest in various ways, such as fans imitating their idols' behaviors, including engaging in virtual world roleplaying games with elements of sexual deviance. Moreover, the influence of idols like BLACKPINK extends to fans' makeup behavior, where imitation fosters identity formation, confidence, and social connections. Overall, the sexualization of K-pop idols can significantly impact adolescent fans' attitudes and behaviors, shaping their self-perception, social interactions, and online activities.The impact of social media on grade 10 students?

The impact of social media on grade 10 students varies based on different studies. Research by Siemenssuggests that social media addiction alone does not significantly affect academic performance. In contrast, Castillasfound that social media exposure can have a positive effect on academic performance, especially when combined with effective study habits. Pallavidelves into the challenges faced by students using social media and aims to improve their overall experience. Perera and Harshanathhighlight the risks of excessive social media usage, including impacts on studies and health. Overall, while social media addiction can pose challenges, proper guidance, improved study habits, and a balanced approach to social media use can help mitigate negative impacts and even enhance academic performance among grade 10 students.