scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What are the different types of attenuation techniques used in dpa attacks? 


Best insight from top research papers

Differential Power Analysis (DPA) attacks utilize various attenuation techniques to break the security of cryptographic systems. These techniques exploit differences between multiples and primary reflections, focusing on velocity disparities and the periodic nature of multiples versus the non-periodic primaries . Additionally, DPA involves statistical analysis of power consumption to reveal secret keys, with attackers collecting power traces and comparing them to hypothetical traces to identify the key used . Recent advancements in DPA include models and types of attacks, along with proposed efficient attack techniques and countermeasures to enhance security against such attacks . Furthermore, DPA with a phase-based waveform matching technique has been proposed to adjust for timing deviations and defeat countermeasures, demonstrating advantages over conventional attacks in systems like the Data Encryption Standard (DES) software .

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
Not addressed in the paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
J. Wardell, P. Whiting 
3 Citations
Not addressed in the paper.
The paper discusses Differential Power Analysis (DPA) attacks and countermeasures but does not specifically mention types of attenuation techniques used in DPA attacks.
Not addressed in the paper.

Related Questions

What are the current methods used for detecting and mitigating DDoS attacks?4 answersCurrent methods for detecting and mitigating Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks include various approaches. One method involves utilizing the Gini impurity technique on Software Defined Networks (SDN) controllers in IoT networks to measure network traffic homogeneity, achieving high detection rates of 98% to 100%. Additionally, real-time detectors with low computational overhead are crucial, with statistical methods and existing datasets playing a significant role in constructing new solutions. Pushback mechanisms, involving routers identifying and deleting potentially malicious packets, along with client puzzles to authenticate traffic, offer a hybrid approach to combat DDoS attacks effectively. Machine learning and deep learning techniques, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have also shown promise in quickly identifying and mitigating DDoS anomalies in SDN environments.
What are the advantages of Computing in memory in DPA attacks?5 answersComputing in Memory (CiM) offers advantages in protecting against Differential Power Analysis (DPA) attacks. CiM implementations can enhance security by incorporating techniques like memory encryption and authentication schemes, such as MEAS, which limit the vulnerability to DPA attacks. Additionally, CiM can mitigate DPA risks by enabling operations directly in memory, reducing the exposure of sensitive data to potential attacks. Furthermore, CiM architectures based on emerging nonvolatile memristive technologies can implement countermeasures like hiding and masking to enhance security against power side-channel attacks, making them less susceptible to DPA vulnerabilities compared to traditional SRAM-based CiM systems. These features collectively contribute to the resilience of CiM systems against DPA threats, making them a promising solution for secure computing in the presence of potential security risks.
What are some of the most common types of cyber attacks?4 answersCyber attacks are a growing threat in today's digital world. Some of the most common types of cyber attacks include espionage, sabotage, extortion, show of skills, phishing, malware, ransomware, social engineering, identity theft, denial-of-service, web-based attacks, Denial of Service, Zero Day Manipulations, Cross-Site Scripting, and IoT threats. These attacks can be carried out by various groups such as competitors, nation states, hacktivists, criminals, disgruntled employees, rogue wizzes, and script kiddies. The increase in online activities during the COVID-19 pandemic has also led to a rise in cyber security attacks, with individuals being vulnerable to phishing, malware, ransomware, social engineering, identity theft, and denial-of-service attacks. It is important for organizations and individuals to be aware of these common types of cyber attacks and take appropriate measures to protect themselves and their data.
What are the three types of adversarial attacks?5 answersThere are three types of adversarial attacks: soft-label, hard-label, and transfer attacks. Another type of adversarial attack is the Type I attack, which aims to cheat classifiers by significant changes, such as changing a face but still being recognized as the same person by well-trained neural networks. These Type I attacks increase Type I error, while the existing adversarial attacks increase Type II error. Additionally, there are universal attacks that can fool classification networks into classifying all examples to one targeted class and are transferable between different models.
What are the different types of SQL injection attacks?5 answersSQL injection attacks are a common type of attack targeting web applications. There are several types of SQL injection attacks, including Blind SQL injection, which exploits a gap in the database server by reverse engineering the SQL query from error messages. Another type is command injection, which is extremely prevalent and ranked as the second most common form of attack on the web. Additionally, there are general SQL injection attacks that involve inserting malicious code in the SQL query to alter its meaning. These attacks can lead to unauthorized access to data and potential loss of data integrity.
What are the different types of DoS attacks that can be launched on smart healthcare systems?5 answersDifferent types of Denial of Service (DoS) attacks that can be launched on smart healthcare systems include rapid destruction of the network and taking control of the network gradually. These attacks can pose significant threats to the healthcare industry, especially during critical situations like the COVID-19 pandemic. The comprehensive analysis of these attacks is crucial for implementing robust security solutions in healthcare systems.These attacks can significantly degrade the performance of machine learning-based smart healthcare systems, leading to erroneous treatment and patient misclassification. Adversarial ML algorithms such as HopSkipJump, Fast Gradient Method, Crafting Decision Tree, Carlini & Wagner, and Zeroth Order Optimization can be employed to perform malicious activities like data poisoning and misclassification on smart healthcare systems.Additionally, other attacks that can endanger health monitoring systems include Fingerprint and Timing-based Snooping, Router Attack, Select and Forwarding attack, Sensor attack, and Replay Attack.

See what other people are reading

What are the most common types of cyber security attacks targeting Internet of Things (IoT) devices?
5 answers
The most common types of cyber security attacks targeting Internet of Things (IoT) devices include Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, injection attacks, Man-in-the-middle attacks, information gathering, malware attacks, and irregularities like strange placement on the IoT framework. These attacks pose significant threats to IoT systems due to their vulnerability and the increasing number of connected devices globally. To combat these threats, innovative solutions like Moving Target Defense for IoT (MTDIoT) have been proposed, which dynamically change network configurations to make it challenging for attackers to target specific devices and services. Implementing advanced authentication methods such as one-time password (OTP), ID- and password-based, three-factor/multi-factor, and blockchain can also enhance the security of IoT devices and mitigate potential harms.
What is latency and jitter?
5 answers
Latency refers to the delay in data transmission, crucial in applications like Virtual Reality (VR) and real-time communication. Jitter, on the other hand, is the variation in latency, impacting the smoothness of data delivery. In wireless networks like 5G and 6G, minimizing jitter is vital for time-sensitive applications such as V2X communication and real-time industrial control. Techniques like time-stamping and buffer management help control jitter without requiring complex network-wide synchronization. In the context of superconducting nanowire single photon detectors, fluctuations in latency parameters contribute to intrinsic timing jitter, affecting the detector's response time. Understanding and managing latency and jitter are essential for optimizing system performance and user experience in various technological domains.
What varieties of faults can be detected within the smart grid?
5 answers
Various types of faults that can be detected within the smart grid include power quality (PQ) events like interruptions, surges, and sags, distribution denial of service (DDoS) attacks, fault data injection attacks (FDIA), random attacks, anomalous electric current or faulty current in transmission lines, and fault information attacks that are hidden and destructive, evading traditional fault diagnosis methods. These faults can disrupt the regular operation of the power system, leading to equipment failure and potential damage. Detection and classification of these faults are crucial for maintaining the reliability and efficiency of the smart grid system, with advanced techniques like machine learning, wavelet analysis, and neural networks being employed to enhance fault detection capabilities and automate fault handling processes.
What is quality control in services ?
5 answers
Quality control in services involves methods to ensure consistent and satisfactory service delivery. Various approaches exist in different fields. In the hospitality sector, operators like Hilton employ internal quality support systems and tools for quality management. In wireless communication, a method uses QoS information to control service quality when User Equipment accesses a 5G core network. Another method utilizes Hash arrays to distinguish between sequential and random read-write requests, enhancing service quality and user experience. Network apparatuses can control service quality based on BIER information, enhancing network flexibility and multicast technology. Additionally, a method involves receiving API calls to control quality of service for applications, improving efficiency in APP development. These diverse methods highlight the importance of tailored quality control measures in different service domains.
What is relationship between reliability and energy efficiency?
5 answers
Reliability and energy efficiency are closely intertwined in various systems. In autonomous systems computers, energy efficiency and reliability are crucial for cost-effective and safe missions. Similarly, in pump units, balancing reliability and energy efficiency is essential for optimal operation. Wireless body area networks (WBANs) also highlight the importance of energy-efficient and reliable routing solutions for stability and network lifetime. Moreover, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) face challenges of power consumption and reliability, where efficient power usage is vital to maintain reliability. Overall, the trade-off between reliability and energy efficiency is evident across different systems, emphasizing the need to find a balance to ensure optimal performance while conserving energy and maintaining system dependability.
How does honey pot help securing network and services?
5 answers
Honey pots play a crucial role in enhancing network security by providing an additional layer of defense against unauthorized access and malicious activities. These systems analyze hacker behavior, detect unauthorized clients, and help in identifying network intrusions. By mimicking legitimate targets, honey pots lure attackers into a controlled environment, allowing organizations to study their actions and improve security measures. They are effective in detecting encrypted attacks in IPv6 networks and capturing various types of frauds, surpassing traditional security measures like firewalls and intrusion detection systems. Additionally, honey pots serve as a valuable security monitoring tool, helping to reduce the risk of attacks on computer networks and revealing critical information about potential system vulnerabilities. Overall, honey pots are instrumental in safeguarding networks and services by proactively detecting and deterring potential threats.
What research has been done on 5g throughput data scheduling and link adaptation?
6 answers
Research on 5G throughput data scheduling and link adaptation has explored various innovative approaches to enhance network performance, reliability, and efficiency. Lanlan Li and Tao Ye developed a wireless network traffic prediction model using long short-term memory cyclic neural networks, focusing on throughput prediction for 5G wireless networks, which underscores the importance of accurate traffic forecasting in optimizing network scheduling and resource allocation. Athanasios Kanavos et al. introduced SOVANET, a scheduler for beyond 5G networks that optimizes resource allocation for critical automated driving applications by considering the Radio Access Network (RAN) load, demonstrating the need for differentiated scheduling approaches for critical and non-critical services. Maryam Imran Sheik Mamode and Tulsi Pawan Fowdur investigated three scheduling algorithms (Proportional Fair, Round Robin, and Best CQI) in an uplink 5G system, revealing insights into the trade-offs between throughput, fairness, and resource sharing among users. Praveen S et al. proposed a reinforcement learning-based method for intelligent link adaptation in URLLC, addressing the challenge of outdated CQI feedback due to diverse and fast fading channel conditions. Preeti Samhita Pati et al. focused on a Machine Learning-based Link Adaptation scheme to improve system throughput by selecting the optimal Modulation Coding Scheme (MCS), highlighting the role of advanced algorithms in achieving spectral efficiency. Jihas Khan and Lillykutty Jacob addressed multi-connectivity with packet duplication for URLLC, proposing a solution for efficient radio resource utilization while meeting QoS requirements. Qing He et al. proposed a semi-persistent scheduler based on adaptive short-term traffic prediction, aiming to improve network performance with reduced computational cost. Research on integrating 5G with Time-Sensitive Network (TSN) technology for deterministic data transmission in industrial control scenarios was also conducted, emphasizing the need for scheduling algorithms that can support time-sensitive services. Lastly, a comparative analysis of several link adaptation schemes by Maryam Imran Sheik Mamode and Tulsi Pawan Fowdur demonstrated the effectiveness of dynamic modulation and coding adjustments based on SINR values in enhancing 5G system performance. This body of research collectively advances our understanding of 5G throughput data scheduling and link adaptation, offering diverse methodologies and solutions to meet the evolving demands of 5G networks.
What implications do the findings hold for RPLs security and effectiveness?
4 answers
The research findings highlight significant vulnerabilities in the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) regarding both internal and external routing attacks. RPL's inherent design flaws make it susceptible to attacks that degrade network performance, stability, and security. While RPL offers some security modes, recent studies reveal that even with enhanced security mechanisms like the chained secure mode (CSM), vulnerabilities persist, especially against internal attacks. The impact of these attacks is substantial, leading to degraded Quality of Service (QoS), increased energy consumption, and higher control traffic overhead, particularly in large-scale deployments and under composite attack scenarios. Addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial for enhancing RPL's security and effectiveness in IoT networks, necessitating the development of more robust security solutions to safeguard against a wide range of routing attacks.
How to find out how hidden channels are being used in practice?
5 answers
To identify how hidden channels are utilized in practice, various methods and technologies have been developed. Researchers have explored the use of blockchain technology as a covert communication carrier, offering decentralization and anonymity for covert communication purposes. Detection methods involve monitoring database objects for hidden communication activities and applying trial testing to identify abnormal operations related to hidden channels. Enhancements in network covert channels include the integration of micro-protocols for improved features like reliability and dynamic routing, enriching botnet communications for increased adaptiveness and stealthiness. Additionally, the analysis of performance indicators in telecommunication networks has led to the development of steganographic systems with enhanced covert channel throughput, ensuring high information security levels through efficient data transmission and extraction methods. These diverse approaches collectively contribute to understanding and detecting the practical usage of hidden channels in various contexts.
Describe The Traffic-Aware Scatter Net Scheduling (TAAS) for Multicast Wireless Protocols methodology?
5 answers
The Traffic-Aware Scatter Net Scheduling (TASS) algorithm is a sophisticated scheduling approach designed to minimize data transmission latency in wireless networks. It combines random-access and deterministic scheduling, randomly assigning nodes to time slots while considering current network traffic to reduce latency. Quality of Service Aware Scheduler (QAS) is proposed for diverse traffic mixes, aiming for balanced QoS delivery with moderate fairness among users. In the context of Wireless Sensor Networks, TSCH mode under IEEE 802.15.4e is explored for Industry 4.0 requirements, with various decentralized TSCH schedulers classified into autonomous, distributed, and Reinforcement Learning-based protocols for handling heterogeneous traffic scenarios. These methodologies collectively address latency reduction, QoS optimization, and efficient scheduling for diverse wireless network applications.
What is the main difference between SSPs and RCPs?
4 answers
The main difference between SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) and RCPs (Representative Concentration Pathways) lies in their focus and purpose. SSPs are scenarios that describe potential future socioeconomic developments, including population growth, economic trends, and technological advancements, influencing greenhouse gas emissions and land use. On the other hand, RCPs are pathways that represent different levels of radiative forcing based on greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. While SSPs provide a framework for exploring how different societal choices can lead to varying emissions, RCPs offer a set of scenarios for modeling the resulting climate impacts. In essence, SSPs focus on socioeconomic factors shaping emissions, while RCPs concentrate on the resulting atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and their impact on climate change modeling.