Search or ask a question

What are the different types of wire arc addictive welding?

Electric resistance welding

Submerged arc welding

Laser beam welding

Welding power supply

Best insight from top research papers

There are several types of wire arc additive welding methods mentioned in the abstracts. One method is cable-type welding wire (CWW) arc welding, which uses a CWW composed of seven welding wires to improve deposition rate and welding quality . Another method is solid wire arc welding, which eliminates the need for copper plating on the wire surface, improving feedability and reducing energy consumption during manufacture . A wire for submerged arc welding is also mentioned, which contains specific components to achieve desired properties in the weld metal . Additionally, a welding apparatus with a switching element and a protection circuit is described, which protects the switching element from damage during short-circuits . Lastly, a composite wire for arc welding is mentioned, which consists of various components to obtain thermally and wear-resistant weld metal .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Patent Composite wire for arc welding Zorin Ilya Vasilevich, Sokolov Gennadij Nikolaevich, Dubtsov Yurij Nikolaevich, Lysak Vladimir Ilich, Fastov Sergej Anatolevich - Show less +4 more 16 Jan 2020	The provided paper does not mention the different types of wire arc additive welding. The paper is about a specific composite wire for arc welding.
Patent Hot wire type arc welding system Masanori Mizuno, Yoshiaki Kato, Takaji Mizuno - Show less +2 more 30 Dec 1982 7 Citations	The provided paper does not mention the different types of wire arc additive welding.
Patent Wire for submerged arc welding Ikai Kazuya, Ken Yamashita - Show less +1 more 09 Mar 2017 2 Citations	The provided paper does not mention the different types of wire arc additive welding.
Patent Solid wire for arc welding Yamaoka Yukio, Geun Chul Song - Show less +1 more 14 Apr 2003 9 Citations	The provided paper does not mention the different types of wire arc additive welding. The paper is about a specific type of solid wire for arc welding that does not require copper plating.
Journal Article•DOI Cable-type welding wire arc welding Yong Chen, Chenfu Fang, Zhidong Yang, Jiayou Wang, Guoxiang Xu, Xiaoyan Gu - Show less +5 more 01 Jan 2018-The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 6 Citations	The paper does not provide information about the different types of wire arc addictive welding.

My columns

Related Questions

What are the types of graph?5 answersVarious types of graphs are discussed in the literature. These include fundamental types like complete, cycle, star, wheel, linear, and grid graphs. Additionally, there are specialized graphs such as commuting graphs, non-commuting graphs, conjugate graphs, and conjugacy class graphs for certain groups. Moreover, the concept of graphs extends to more complex data structures beyond trees, encompassing structures like difference lists, doubly-linked lists, skip lists, and leaf-linked trees, which are handled in a new functional language called $\lambda_{GT}$. Furthermore, in the realm of deep learning, there is a focus on Graph Neural Networks, Message-passing Neural Networks, Relational Networks, and Graph Networks, which allow for the projection of graph vertices into a hyperdimensional real space for iterative refinement in learning tasks.

What are the types of smoking?5 answersThe types of smoking include traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), and heated tobacco products (HTPs). Traditional smoking involves the use of conventional cigarettes, which are known to cause various health problems and are linked to multiple diseases. Electronic cigarettes, also known as e-cigarettes, are gaining popularity and are considered to have lower biomarker levels compared to traditional cigarettes but higher than non-smokers. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are another type of smoking that has been found to have a lesser impact on periodontal therapy compared to traditional smoking and e-cigarettes. These different types of smoking have varying effects on health outcomes and biomarker levels, highlighting the importance of understanding the implications of each type.

What are the different types of habits that can turn into addictions?5 answersAddictive habits can include behaviors that offer quick rewards and a spike in dopamine levels, such as gambling, internet poker, and sports betting. Addiction can also involve the development of patterns of wanting and liking, as well as the establishment of habits of using, which are sustained by automatization and pleasure. There is debate over the role of habits in addiction, with some arguing that habits alone cannot account for the development of compulsive drug use and addiction. Additionally, addiction can be formed to various activities or behaviors that allow individuals to escape from life and its problems, including shopping, sexual activities, food, prescribed and illegal drugs, alcohol, and even other people. The development and persistence of addictions can be influenced by genetic differences, physiological alterations induced by drugs or alcohol, and environmental or developmental factors.

What are the different types of metal additive manufacturing?3 answersMetal additive manufacturing encompasses various processes for building 3D metal objects. These processes include laser metal deposition (LMD), selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM or L-PBF), direct metal deposition (DMD), and laser melting.LMD is derived from laser cladding processes and is part of the directed energy deposition process. SLS and SLM use an identical laser beam but differ in the consolidation mechanisms of the powder bed. L-PBF offers design freedom and is advantageous for metal additive manufacturing.Other metal additive manufacturing techniques include direct energy deposition (DED), binder jetting, powder bed fusion (PBF), hot spray coatings, sheet lamination, and material extrusion.These methods utilize different energy sources and have specific needs, applications, and challenges.Additionally, indirect metal methods and direct metal methods are used in the casting of precious metals, with direct metal methods including laser melting, material extrusion, binder jetting, material jetting, and vat photopolymerization.

What are the different types of addiction?4 answersAddiction can be classified into different types based on clinical observations. The four types of addiction identified are traumatic, actual, transitional, and sociopathic. Traumatic and actual types of addiction have a more favorable prognosis, while individual psychotherapy and support in a medical setting are effective for the traumatic type. Treatment in a family setting appears to be suitable for actual and transitional types of addiction. The therapeutic community may prove to be effective in the treatment of persons affected by sociopathic type of addiction. In addition to substance addictions, process addictions such as food, sex, shopping, and gambling problems are also considered as types of addiction.

What can be welded?5 answersWelding can be used to join components and create welded parts, assemblies, and structures. It is a manufacturing process that plays a crucial role in design. Metals such as Monel, nimonic, nickel-based alloys, titanium, zirconium, and molybdenum can be welded using Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding. Reactive metals like titanium, zirconium, and aluminum need to be welded soon after preparation to prevent oxidation. Phosphor bronze can be welded with good bead appearance using TIG welding. Plastics can also be joined by welding. Additionally, a welded metal can have a predetermined component composition and contain carbide particles of specific sizes. The welding system described in one paper allows for multi-mode welding and can weld materials such as carbon, stainless steel, nickel alloys, titanium, copper alloys, aluminum alloys, and magnesium.

See what other people are reading

How do welded imperfections affect the structural integrity of steel constructions?

Welded imperfections significantly impact the structural integrity of steel constructions. Imperfections like defects, residual stresses, and distortions can lead to reduced mechanical properties, increased fatigue susceptibility, and potential failure under loading conditions. Studies emphasize the importance of understanding imperfections' influence on weld joints, as they can cause a decrease in fatigue strength and toughness, especially in high-strength steels. Additionally, initial imperfections from welding processes can affect buckling and ultimate strength, necessitating accurate prediction and assessment methods for structural reliability. The presence of imperfections highlights the need for thorough analysis, post-weld treatments, and defect-free weld joints to ensure the safety and durability of steel constructions.Why T joint weldings are important in aerospace industry?

T-joint weldings are crucial in the aerospace industry due to their significance in producing defect-free welds. Welding dissimilar materials like aluminum and titanium alloys in T-joints can lead to cost reduction and enhanced reliability in aircraft structures. Additionally, the use of welding techniques like friction stir welding (FSW) with aluminum alloys is vital for aerospace applications, as these materials offer high strength and ductility, especially at cryogenic temperatures. Furthermore, friction stir welding technology is emerging as a key method in aerospace manufacturing, replacing traditional welding methods and improving production efficiency. Overall, T-joint weldings play a critical role in ensuring structural integrity, performance, and cost-effectiveness in the aerospace industry, making them indispensable for the advancement of aircraft manufacturing processes.How do these parameters vary across different industries and applications, affecting the LABOR cost of GMAW weldings?

The labor cost of Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) is significantly influenced by various parameters across different industries and applications, as highlighted by the research contexts provided. The complexity and variability of these parameters directly impact the efficiency, quality, and ultimately, the labor costs associated with GMAW processes. Firstly, the selection of process parameters, such as welding current, voltage, and speed, plays a crucial role in determining the bead geometry and, consequently, the mechanical properties of the weldment. Incorrect parameter settings can lead to defects, requiring rework or additional quality control measures, thereby increasing labor costs. Additionally, the use of advanced welding techniques like pulsed current GMAW and dual-pulsed GMAW can affect the thermal behavior of the droplet and the microstructural evolution of the weld, which necessitates skilled labor and sophisticated equipment, further influencing labor costs. The application of novel welding methods, such as consumable double electrode with a single arc GMAW, introduces additional control variables that can enhance welding productivity but require specialized knowledge and training, impacting labor expenses. Moreover, the optimization of shielding gas flow rates and compositions to improve weld quality and reduce gas consumption can also contribute to labor cost variations, as it involves careful monitoring and adjustment of welding parameters. The implementation of robotic GMAW in manufacturing industries introduces the need for integrating sensors and developing mathematical models to predict bead geometry, which requires upfront investment in technology and training, affecting labor costs. Furthermore, the influence of wire feed rate on weld characteristics and the necessity to adjust it based on changes in welding current or pulse parameters highlights the complexity of achieving optimal welding conditions, which can extend welding time and increase labor costs. In summary, the labor cost of GMAW welding is affected by a multitude of factors, including the selection and optimization of welding parameters, the application of advanced welding techniques, the integration of automation, and the necessity for skilled labor to manage these complexities. These factors vary across different industries and applications, leading to significant variations in labor costs.What are the ideal current parametres for gmaw welding of 5mm steel?

The ideal current parameters for Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) of 5mm steel vary depending on several factors including the welding speed, voltage, and specific welding conditions such as the use of pulsed or non-pulsed current. However, synthesizing data from multiple studies provides a comprehensive understanding of the optimal settings for this specific application. For mild steel A36 with a thickness of 5mm, a welding current of 120A with no bevel angle was found to yield the best results in terms of mechanical properties when welded in a fillet joint under 1F position. This finding is supported by another study that identified optimal welding parameters for mild steel, suggesting a current of 150 amps, voltage of 23 volts, and wire feed rate of 4 m/min to improve weld quality and minimize defects. Further analysis through an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based optimization for welding C45 medium carbon steel, which shares similar characteristics with mild steel, recommended a weld current of 160A, voltage of 30V, and a weld speed of 475.75 mm/min. This indicates a slight variation in optimal current settings depending on the specific steel grade and welding conditions. Pulsed GMAW, which is another variant of the GMAW process, emphasizes the importance of pulse parameters on weld quality. While specific current settings are not directly mentioned for 5mm steel, the control of pulse parameters significantly affects the weld's mechanical properties and quality. Considering the diversity in welding conditions and methods (e.g., pulsed vs. non-pulsed GMAW), a range of 120A to 160A can be considered ideal for GMAW welding of 5mm steel, with adjustments based on specific conditions such as the use of pulsed current, welding speed, and voltage. These adjustments should aim to optimize weld quality, mechanical properties, and minimize defects. In conclusion, while there is a range of recommended current settings, the specific application, welding technique, and steel characteristics should guide the final selection of welding parameters.What are the ideal current parametres for gmaw welding of mm steel?

The ideal current parameters for Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) of mild steel vary depending on the specific conditions and goals of the welding process, including the thickness of the steel, desired weld quality, and the welding position. However, insights from several studies provide a range of optimal current settings and related parameters that can guide the selection for effective GMAW of mild steel. For welding mild steel, a current of 150 amps was identified as optimal when considering a combination of voltage and wire feed rate to achieve high-quality welds with minimal defects. This setting aims to balance penetration and bead appearance while minimizing potential welding defects. In another study focusing on mild steel A36 with a thickness of 5 mm in a fillet joint (1F position), the best welding parameters were found to be a current of 120 A, with no bevel angle, underlining the importance of adjusting current settings based on joint configuration and steel grade. Further research into the GMAW of C45 medium carbon steel, which shares some characteristics with mild steel, suggests an optimal weld current of 160 A, alongside a weld voltage of 30 V and a weld speed of 475.75 mm/min, to obtain sound welds. This indicates that for thicker or different grades of steel, adjustments in current may be necessary to achieve optimal results. Moreover, the study of high strength steel welding emphasized that increasing the welding current can significantly affect penetration depth, which is crucial for thicker materials. This suggests that for mild steel of varying thicknesses, the current may need to be adjusted accordingly to ensure adequate penetration without compromising weld quality. In the context of dissimilar welding, which can involve mild steel, an optimal setting was found to be a welding current of 100 A, alongside other parameters like gas flow rate and nozzle to plate distance, highlighting the importance of current in achieving quality dissimilar welds. Lastly, an investigation into improving the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of welds suggested an optimum welding current of 240A for achieving superior weld strength, although this higher current setting is more specific to the goals of maximizing UTS rather than general welding practices. In summary, while the ideal GMAW current parameters for mild steel can vary, a range from 120 A to 160 A is generally recommended for most applications, with adjustments made based on specific project requirements, steel thickness, and desired weld characteristics.What are the ideal current parametres for gmaw welding of 3mm low carbon steel?

The ideal current parameters for GMAW welding of 3mm low carbon steel can be determined by analyzing various studies that have explored the optimization of welding parameters to achieve high-quality welds. According to Jagtap and Raut, an optimum current setting of 150 A is suggested for achieving better strength in welded joints of low-carbon steel. This is corroborated by Lostado Lorza et al., who identified optimal welding parameters for cost and strength considerations, suggesting a range around 140.593 to 150.372 amps, depending on specific design requirements. Furthermore, the study by Amiruddin et al. supports the use of a current setting of 150 amps as part of the optimized parameters for welding mild steel, which aligns with the material characteristics of low carbon steel. Achebo's research further refines this by suggesting a higher current of 240A for achieving an excellent Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS), although this higher current may be more specific to the conditions of their study rather than a general recommendation for all 3mm low carbon steel GMAW welding. Considering the variability in optimal current settings suggested by different studies, it's important to note that the specific application, desired weld quality, and other welding parameters such as voltage, speed, and gas flow rate also play critical roles in determining the ideal current setting. For instance, the interaction of current with voltage and wire feed rate is crucial for optimizing weld quality and minimizing defects. Additionally, the use of different gases and their influence on the welding process must be considered, as highlighted by Romaní et al., who studied the shielding influence of different gases on the welding process. In summary, while an optimal current range of 150 to 240 amps is suggested across various studies for GMAW welding of 3mm low carbon steel, the exact setting within this range should be selected based on specific project requirements, material properties, and other welding parameters for the best results.What are the ideal current parametres for gmaw welding of 5mm S235JR low carbon steel?

The ideal current parameters for GMAW welding of 5mm S235JR low carbon steel can be determined by considering various studies that have explored the effects of welding parameters on the quality and strength of welded joints. According to Lostado Lorza et al., optimal welding parameters for achieving design requirements such as cost, manufacturing speed, strength, and surface finish in butt joints of EN 235JR steel were identified, with current settings ranging from 140.593 amps to 150.372 amps depending on the specific design requirement. This range suggests that for low carbon steel similar to S235JR, a current setting within this range could be considered ideal depending on the specific welding goals. Further supporting this, Zakaria et al. found that for mild steel A36, which has similar properties to S235JR low carbon steel, the best welding parameters for fillet joints included a current setting of 120 A. This falls within the range identified by Lostado Lorza et al., reinforcing the idea that a current setting around 120 A to 150 A could be considered ideal for welding 5mm S235JR low carbon steel. Moreover, the importance of selecting appropriate current settings to ensure weld quality and minimize defects is highlighted across various studies. For instance, Raval et al. emphasized the significance of selecting proper pulse parameters to avoid weld defects, while Hoyos-Arango et al. and Wang et al. discussed the impact of current on the stability and quality of welds. These considerations further underscore the necessity of choosing current parameters carefully to achieve optimal welding outcomes. In conclusion, while the ideal current parameters for GMAW welding of 5mm S235JR low carbon steel may vary slightly depending on specific welding goals and conditions, a current setting in the range of approximately 120 A to 150 A is supported by the literature as a starting point for achieving high-quality welds with minimal defects.What are the ideal current parametres for gmaw welding of 3mm S235JR low carbon steel?

The ideal current parameters for GMAW welding of 3mm S235JR low carbon steel can be determined by considering various research findings that explore the influence of welding parameters on the quality and strength of welds. According to Lostado Lorza et al., optimal welding parameters for achieving design requirements such as cost, manufacturing speed, strength, and surface finish in butt joints of EN 235JR steel were identified, with current settings ranging from 140.593 amps to 150.372 amps depending on the specific design requirement. This suggests that a current setting within this range could be considered ideal for welding 3mm S235JR low carbon steel. Further analysis by Achebo indicates that an optimum welding current of 240A was suggested for improving the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of welds, although this higher current was part of a specific protocol aimed at enhancing strength values. This might suggest that for applications where maximum strength is critical, higher currents may be beneficial, albeit for a different material and thickness. Romaní et al. studied the influence of welding parameters on ingot iron, which, while not directly correlating to S235JR steel, provides insight into the process, suggesting that the welding current needs to be adjusted based on the shielding gas and welding position to ensure quality surface finish and penetration. Amiruddin et al. optimized GMAW process parameters for mild steel, finding an ideal current of 150 amps for achieving desired tensile strength without defects. This aligns closely with the range suggested by Lostado Lorza et al. and supports the notion that a current setting around 150 amps could be considered ideal for similar applications. Considering the variability in optimal current settings based on specific goals (e.g., cost efficiency, manufacturing speed, joint strength, and surface finish), a current parameter in the range of 140 to 150 amps would likely be a good starting point for GMAW welding of 3mm S235JR low carbon steel, with adjustments made based on specific welding conditions and requirements.How welding connected in academic translation?

Welding in academic translation is crucial for ensuring manufacturing accuracy. Automatic translation methods based on advanced technologies like Cyclic Generative Adversarial Networks (CycleGAN) are proposed to enhance the efficiency of translating engineering drawings in welding processes. These methods involve using U-Net and PatchGAN networks for generating and discriminating, respectively, with a focus on feature mapping and noise robustness. Additionally, the utilization of high-dimensional sparse networks and increased resolution in generated graphs aids in improving the precision of welding engineering drawings. Furthermore, the integration of automated welding devices with advanced features like cameras, processing circuitry, and electromechanical subsystems contributes to real-time adjustments during welding based on the physical characteristics of workpieces.How welding connected to academic translation?

Welding is linked to academic translation through innovative methods like automated welding devices and translation welding type ultrasonic welding devices, enhancing manufacturing processes. Academic translation plays a crucial role in improving welding engineering drawings' accuracy and efficiency. For instance, the use of Cyclic Generative Adversarial Networks (CycleGAN) in translating welding engineering drawings automates the process, significantly boosting production efficiency and precision. Additionally, parallel-connection welding robots with advanced control mechanisms streamline welding processes, showcasing the integration of academic translation principles in welding technology. These advancements underscore the vital connection between welding practices and academic translation techniques, driving progress in intelligent manufacturing.What is the modified two-specimen method in metal forming?

The modified two-specimen method in metal forming involves creating tailored metal blanks composed of two pieces with different thicknesses, where at least one piece is modified to include a transition region for achieving a similar thickness along the joint. Subsequently, the two pieces are joined using welding processes like laser welding or friction stir welding. This method allows for the production of complex industrial components by forming intricate shapes through processes like incremental sheet metal forming (ISMF). Additionally, innovative specimen designs like the small Two bar specimen (TBS) are utilized for non-destructive creep testing to determine creep properties and remaining life of high-temperature engineering components with limited material availability. These advancements in specimen design and metal joining techniques enhance the efficiency and accuracy of metal forming processes.